TROLL post

"David B." "David
Sat, 09 Feb 2019 08:22:53 GMT in
alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 09/02/2019 07:28, Diesel wrote:
"David B." "David
Fri, 08 Feb 2019 10:45:04
GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote:

On 08/02/2019 07:33, Diesel wrote:
In what possible way have you ever shown yourself to be an
honest, good guy as you so often claim... When your own actions
show nothing of the sort on a daily basis, David? How do you
justify your actions?

I used to have regular chats by telephone with Jax.

Jax probably regrets providing you a way to do that.

Probably. I've had no contact for quite some time. :-(

I warned Jax about you. I don't feel the least bit sorry they opted
to learn the hard way. I know you made them more than slightly
uncomfortable, and, that greatly amuses me. Nothing like some semi
anonymous usenet troll getting ****ed over and how by another usenet
troll - all because they thought you and them could work together to
attack me. Except, you turned on them with a quickness. rofl!


I know EXACTLY what you did and the lies you told to have Jax's
ISP account closed down. Jax also shared with me by email the
correspondence with the ISP involved.

You're clearly making things up, again.

Do you deny that you did so?

You are making up a completely bull**** story about my having stalked
jax in any way. I made no effort to learn anything about them. I
considered them to be another pooh sock, truth be told, and I'm not
convinced they aren't one in the same individual. At no time did Jax
ever give the impression I was even a small concern to them. After
all, I made no attempt to reach out to them in real life, YOU DID.

And being the smug asshat I knew them to be, they foolishly answered
your call, trusted you with something or other (haha, stupid move on
their part) and YOU blackmailed them with it. Not me. I still don't
know what the dirt is/was you have/had on them, and more importantly,
I don't care. Anyone stupid enough to trust you with something of a
personal nature they don't want shared deserves to be burned in the
way you'd do them and then some. Further, anyone stupid enough to
take your word at face value over mine without so much as a thought
to checking into things either of us wrote on their own, deserves
nothing but contempt and mockery from me when they discover I WAS
TELLING THE TRUTH the entire time and you were not. **** them, they
deserve what you did to them. They asked for it. I personally hope
you ****ed them over quite nicely. Knowing you as well as I do, you
haven't disappointed me there.

What's most likely happened is Jax confided in you under the mistaken
belief that you'd never expose them or otherwise let them be held
accountable for their choice usenet posts. You silenced jax by
threatening to publish what you had on them where I'd find it. Or,
you flat out threatened to send me via email what you had on them if
they continued posting to usenet. And, since you already knew I am
the sort who holds a grudge and will light your ass up (and how) for
wrongs you've committed towards me, jax probably still worries that
you'll screw up, or maliciously leak the details you have on jax.
Which could cause the anonymous protection jax enjoyed when writing
trash about me to fail. Leaving jax no recourse but to be held
accountable for their posts on usenet. Yea, you've probably scared
the hell out of them with that possible outcome.

It's one thing to play keyboard cowboy and attack me if you don't
think I can learn more about you for a grand response, as your former
friend Jenn learned the hard way, it's quite another when I do learn
who you are and am able to mount a proper response to your unprovoked
attack. That has a remarkable tendency of changing a persons attitude
towards me, sometimes in a very quick manner. It didn't take long
before your former friend Jenn to realize she was in way over her
head. You didn't bother to warn her about that when she was gearing
up to attack me though, you applauded and further encouraged it.

She was good to go too, until I was able to put a few pieces together
and obliterate the anonymous aspect she thought she had over me.
Would she have attacked me had she not thought she was anonymous and
therefore couldn't be brought to task for anything she wrote? I don't
think so. The only reason she made the decision to attack and slime
me was because at the time, she thought she was anonymous enough to
be able to get away with it. Just as you once did, when you tried to
dox me with several publications of a gsv you thought showed my
house.

You can't claim you were just testing to see if you could do it,
despite you having made that exact claim, multiple times. And, it's
because you created multiple threads in multiple newsgroups all
asking the same question. You and I had no serious problems between
us until you made the mistake of trying to publish a google streetmap
view of my house address. yet, you don't think it was okay for me,
two years after the fact, to share your personal address far and wide
as you tried doing to me?

I smell a rather ****ty double standard that you, David Eagle, and
Jenn Porter all have in common. All three of you like to start ****
with people, but, none of the three of you have the balls to finish
what you started. Instead, all three of you ****ant mother****ers cry
foul when I gave each of you large doses of your own medicines. I
don't feel bad about doing that, and, I'd do it all over again for
the same reason, too.

Your friends (former friends) learned the hard way, you're the only
one who still requires additional help on the same subject matter.
It's no wonder you bombed out of flight school then. You're one of
those people who's stubborn and extremely ignorant. And you will
continue to remain both for the remainder of your life, because you
choose to do so.

Why would Jax lie. Jax was terrified once you really went to town.
:-(

Jax lied quite a bit, and, each time, you defended them or tried to
dismiss it. And so long as I only know them by jax they had No
accountability. Drive by besmirching, etc. Thanks to you, based on
what you've hinted at for years now, Jax thought you might give them
up, and, then they might actually have to answer to me for some of
those choice usenet posts and threads. You made up the entire story
you're trying to peddle now about any harm that came to jax via me.
I've never done a single thing to them. Never tried.

And, I didn't respond to their obvious effort to fish me via email
once either. That supposed deal they tried to offer me, was it
because you caused them to be concerned that I was either close to
knowing who they were, or, already knew who they were? And, as a
result, were trying to make nice nice with me, so I wouldn't give
them what they deserved? That sound about right, and more likely to
be true, David?


--
$636.95 -- The number of the Beast at Sam's Wholesale Club.