A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Photo Equipment » Large Format Photography Equipment
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Sigma Digital SLR Cameras.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old June 27th 04, 01:16 AM
Steven M. Scharf
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sigma Digital SLR Cameras.

"Phil Wheeler" wrote in message
...

Georgette Preddy wrote:


I don't know of anyone who knows anything about digital who shoots
above the lowest ISO setting.


Which simply proves that you know no one who knows anything about
digital. We already have concluded that you are in that category,

Giorgio.

Notice the implicature in GP's statement. Advertisers will often go the
"play dumb" route, with statements like: "we know of no other product as
good as ours."

With the Sigma SLRs you'd better not try to shoot at higher ISOs. It's one
reason that the Sigma SLRs are solidly in the sub-amateur category, EXCEPT,
for landscapes and studio portraits. No one would buy one for any sort of
action photography or low light photographt, where higher ISO settings are
necessary.

GP knows no one who knows anything about digital--including himself.


  #12  
Old July 10th 04, 05:20 PM
Georgette Preddy
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sigma Digital SLR Cameras.

"Peter A. Stavrakoglou" wrote in message t...
"Biff Mullins" wrote in message
m...

Thinking about buying the Sigma DSLR. Either the SD9 or the SD10.
Is the SD10 worth the extra money? What would be the best lens to

start out with.

Oh yeah, does anyone know when that Foveon point and shoot will be

available?

If you need higher ISO settings, the SD10 is the better choice.


Agreed. The SD10 is the lowest noise DLSR out there today by a huge
margin. Its sensor pixels are a whopping 33% larger than the full
frame, $8,000 Canon 1Ds. That really shows in the noise tests where
the 90's-vintage Canon CMOS really gets clobbered by National
Semiconductor's latest design...

http://www.pbase.com/image/31155134/original
  #13  
Old July 11th 04, 02:36 AM
D.R.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Sigma Digital SLR Cameras.


"Georgette Preddy" wrote in message
om...
"Peter A. Stavrakoglou" wrote in message

t...
"Biff Mullins" wrote in message
m...

Thinking about buying the Sigma DSLR. Either the SD9 or the SD10.
Is the SD10 worth the extra money? What would be the best lens to

start out with.

Oh yeah, does anyone know when that Foveon point and shoot will be

available?

If you need higher ISO settings, the SD10 is the better choice.


Agreed. The SD10 is the lowest noise DLSR out there today by a huge
margin. Its sensor pixels are a whopping 33% larger than the full
frame, $8,000 Canon 1Ds. That really shows in the noise tests where
the 90's-vintage Canon CMOS really gets clobbered by National
Semiconductor's latest design...

http://www.pbase.com/image/31155134/original


Too bad the lenses suck. I know, I own two Sigma lenses.

  #14  
Old October 5th 04, 08:15 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

TP wrote:

"Zebedee" wrote:

Before you look for a Sigma DSLR, have a look at the scathing review on
www.dcresource.com about it.



There is nothing scathing about that review. It is a highly
complimentary review that expresses some reservations about the
quality of Sigma lenses. But we knew that anyway.

Some excerpts will show that the review is far from scathing:

---

QUOTED FROM www.dcresource.com:

---

You will, however, find that this 3.4 Megapixel image blows away
anything you've seen before in terms of image quality. I think you'll
agree after viewing the sample photos attached to this review.

---

Included with the SD10 is the excellent Sigma Photo Pro 2.0 software.
This software should serve as an example to other camera
manufacturers, with its great user interface and robust performance.
You'll be spending a lot of time in Photo Pro, since the camera only
saves photos in RAW (X3F) format. At first glance, Photo Pro looks
like just another photo browser (see above photo). But select an image
and you'll find a lot more functionality.

---

In general, I was pleased with the results I saw using the auto
correction feature. If you're not satisfied with how that looks, you
can tweak the settings until the image looks like what you were
expecting.

The manual included with the SD10 is pretty good for a camera manual.
I especially liked the lengthy explanations, and minimal fine print.

---

The first thing you'll notice while looking at the back of the camera
is just how simple everything is. There are just a few buttons and no
dials, making it a welcome change from more complex D-SLRs.

---

If you clicked on those images above, or if you know anything about
the X3 sensor, you won't be surprised to hear my assessment of the
image quality: it's awesome, especially after a trip through that auto
adjustment feature. The sharpness and resolution are truly stunning

---

While the Sigma SD10 would be a nice D-SLR if it used a traditional
CCD or CMOS sensor, it's the SD10's Foveon X3 image sensor which
really makes it stand out from the crowd. Image quality is, in a word,
stunning.

---

Another standout feature of the camera is the Sigma Photo Pro
software, which you'll learn to love. That's because you must
post-process every image, as they're all saved in RAW format.
Thankfully, the Photo Pro software is both capable and responsive. You
can let the camera make automatic adjustments to the image, or you can
tweak it yourself.

---

What I liked:

Stunning image quality
Robust performance
FireWire and USB ports
Uses AA batteries (instead of lithium-ion)
Easy to use
All the benefits of a D-SLR: lenses, flashes, and full manual controls
Excellent Photo Pro software

What I didn't care for:

Poor low light focusing without external flash
Dust seems to be a problem
Some of Sigma's lenses are not so great
All images must be post-processed (this may be a good thing, depending
on your point of view)
Above average noise at high ISOs
Bulky

all the best

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sigma Digital SLR Cameras. Laurence Matson Digital Photography 174 August 1st 04 04:55 PM
Sigma Digital SLR Cameras. Biff Mullins 35mm Photo Equipment 15 July 11th 04 02:36 AM
My Sigma camera and lens collection Giorgio Preddio Digital Photography 65 July 7th 04 10:03 PM
Which is better? digital cameras or older crappy cameras thatuse film? Michael Weinstein, M.D. In The Darkroom 13 January 24th 04 10:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.