If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
ULF equipment question
I made quite a score yesterday, an 11x14 field camera (no idea on the
make, all ID plates are gone), 1 film holder, an ancient Voigtlander & Sohns lens and a 9" lens extension board. All for 150$. The film holder is marked "Eclipse Holder". It is natural wood with reddish dark slides. There do not appear to be flaps that open up to slide the film in, as on a modern holder, but looks like film is loaded from the large opening that the slide covers. There is a sticky substance on the septum I assume was for holding the film flat. Am I on the right track here? When the lens is focused on infinity it measures about 14" from flange to GG. Serial # is 26706. It has a slot for waterhouse stops, but the stops are missing. The glass is quite clean and does not appear to have any seperation between the elements. The aprature is about 2" so im guessing in the neighboorhood of f7 or so. The whole operation was mounted to a metal rack and set up for 1:1 macro when I got it, so Im not sure if the lens will cover 11x14 at infinity. Any ideas on preformance? Is it possible and/or practical to make stops? TIA Brook |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
ULF equipment question
On 1/28/2004 8:30 AM brook spake thus:
I made quite a score yesterday, an 11x14 field camera (no idea on the make, all ID plates are gone), 1 film holder, an ancient Voigtlander & Sohns lens and a 9" lens extension board. All for 150$. Is it possible and/or practical to make stops? Regarding that last: is it possible we Americans have degenerated to the point where people have to wonder if we can still make *holes* in things? -- It's stupid, moronic and too fcuking obvious, as obvious as counting your fingers, so TELL ME SOMETHING I DON'T KNOW or just shut the fcuk up. - "jjs" in extremis on rec.photo.darkroom |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
ULF equipment question
brook wrote:
I made quite a score yesterday, an 11x14 field camera (no idea on the make, all ID plates are gone), 1 film holder, an ancient Voigtlander & Sohns lens and a 9" lens extension board. All for 150$. The film holder is marked "Eclipse Holder". It is natural wood with reddish dark slides. There do not appear to be flaps that open up to slide the film in, as on a modern holder, but looks like film is loaded from the large opening that the slide covers. There is a sticky substance on the septum I assume was for holding the film flat. Am I on the right track here? Since the holder lacks flaps and this outfit is likely quite old, there is a good chance that it is a glass plate holder rather then a film holder. The sticky substance might be someone's effort to convert it to a film holder. If the ground glass hasn't been adjusted, there is a risk of a focus error -- you should check that the film and ground glass are in the same plane. When the lens is focused on infinity it measures about 14" from flange to GG. Serial # is 26706. It has a slot for waterhouse stops, but the stops are missing. The glass is quite clean and does not appear to have any seperation between the elements. The aprature is about 2" so im guessing in the neighboorhood of f7 or so. The whole operation was mounted to a metal rack and set up for 1:1 macro when I got it, so Im not sure if the lens will cover 11x14 at infinity. Any ideas on preformance? Is it possible and/or practical to make stops? Performance is unlikely to be today's state-of-the-art, but then you are unlikely to be enlarging 11x14 negs so extreme sharpness isn't needed. Many of the older lenses didn't have wide coverage and 14 inches is less than the diagonal of 11x14, but there is no way to tell without testing or having a better id of the lens. Why not try making waterhouse stops from black poster board or the like. Later you can try brass -- look for something like flat shim stock. You could either paint the brass or use a chemical blackening solution. --Michael |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
ULF equipment question
Brook:
Go for it!!! You can make chromes like this: http://www.hemenway.com/USS-Salem-Schneider360.jpg Jim - http://www.hemenway.com Michael Briggs wrote: brook wrote: I made quite a score yesterday, an 11x14 field camera (no idea on the make, all ID plates are gone), 1 film holder, an ancient Voigtlander & Sohns lens and a 9" lens extension board. All for 150$. The film holder is marked "Eclipse Holder". It is natural wood with reddish dark slides. There do not appear to be flaps that open up to slide the film in, as on a modern holder, but looks like film is loaded from the large opening that the slide covers. There is a sticky substance on the septum I assume was for holding the film flat. Am I on the right track here? Since the holder lacks flaps and this outfit is likely quite old, there is a good chance that it is a glass plate holder rather then a film holder. The sticky substance might be someone's effort to convert it to a film holder. If the ground glass hasn't been adjusted, there is a risk of a focus error -- you should check that the film and ground glass are in the same plane. When the lens is focused on infinity it measures about 14" from flange to GG. Serial # is 26706. It has a slot for waterhouse stops, but the stops are missing. The glass is quite clean and does not appear to have any seperation between the elements. The aprature is about 2" so im guessing in the neighboorhood of f7 or so. The whole operation was mounted to a metal rack and set up for 1:1 macro when I got it, so Im not sure if the lens will cover 11x14 at infinity. Any ideas on preformance? Is it possible and/or practical to make stops? Performance is unlikely to be today's state-of-the-art, but then you are unlikely to be enlarging 11x14 negs so extreme sharpness isn't needed. Many of the older lenses didn't have wide coverage and 14 inches is less than the diagonal of 11x14, but there is no way to tell without testing or having a better id of the lens. Why not try making waterhouse stops from black poster board or the like. Later you can try brass -- look for something like flat shim stock. You could either paint the brass or use a chemical blackening solution. --Michael -- Jim - http://www.hemenway.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
ULF equipment question
Michael Briggs wrote in message
Since the holder lacks flaps and this outfit is likely quite old, there is a good chance that it is a glass plate holder rather then a film holder. The sticky substance might be someone's effort to convert it to a film holder. If the ground glass hasn't been adjusted, there is a risk of a focus error -- you should check that the film and ground glass are in the same plane. From all I have found out this is the case. I am weighing my options. One thing I am consideing is finding a modern 11x14 back that can accept modern holders, the other is to shim out the GG on the existing back to allow for modern holders. Performance is unlikely to be today's state-of-the-art, but then you are unlikely to be enlarging 11x14 negs so extreme sharpness isn't needed. Many of the older lenses didn't have wide coverage and 14 inches is less than the diagonal of 11x14, but there is no way to tell without testing or having a better id of the lens. I think I will mount this on my 5x7 and see how the image looks. I have been wanting to try a bit more of a pictorolist look, so It may be a candidate. Why not try making waterhouse stops from black poster board or the like. Later you can try brass -- look for something like flat shim stock. You could either paint the brass or use a chemical blackening solution. --Michael I will do this. To determin focal legenth, I measure from the film plane to where? Perhaps the middle of the barrel? I have to guess this was fairly symetrical. Thanks for the ideas Brook |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
ULF equipment question
Jim Hemenway wrote in message ...
Brook: Go for it!!! You can make chromes like this: http://www.hemenway.com/USS-Salem-Schneider360.jpg Jim - http://www.hemenway.com Wow, I never thought about 11x14 chromes. Where do you get your film? Brook |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
ULF equipment question
"brook" wrote
Wow, I never thought about 11x14 chromes. Where do you get your film? I was under the impression an 11x14 Deardorf loaded with Ektachrome was the standard for taking Playboy centerfolds. I am sure most of the centerfolds grew up to become battleships, though. -- Nicholas O. Lindan, Cleveland, Ohio Consulting Engineer: Electronics; Informatics; Photonics. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
ULF equipment question
----- Original Message -----
From: "brook" Newsgroups: rec.photo.equipment.large-format Sent: Friday, January 30, 2004 8:51 AM Subject: ULF equipment question (snip) I will do this. To determin focal legenth, I measure from the film plane to where? Perhaps the middle of the barrel? I have to guess this was fairly symetrical. Thanks for the ideas Focus the lens at infinity (either use a very distant object or autocollimate - google the archives for more info on this). Note the extended position of the lens (measure the front standard extension from the rear say). Now focus the lens at 1:1 magnification (use a ruler as subject and use a ruler to compare image size, or two floppy disks, or two sheets of paper etc). Use front movement to get image size about right and rear standard to fine focus. Iterate until you have sharp 1:1. The focal length should be the difference between the two lens positions. i.e. subtract rear to front standard distance at infinity from rear to front standard distance at 1:1 |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
ULF equipment question
Mostly on ebay. It isn't made anymore but most sellers have kept it
frozen or at least refrigerated, so it's okay for now... as long as I keep it frozen. Jim - http://www.hemenway.com brook wrote: Jim Hemenway wrote in message ... Brook: Go for it!!! You can make chromes like this: http://www.hemenway.com/USS-Salem-Schneider360.jpg Jim - http://www.hemenway.com Wow, I never thought about 11x14 chromes. Where do you get your film? Brook |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
E6 Developing at Home - Is Jobo the right equipment? | Mehawitchi | In The Darkroom | 8 | April 13th 04 07:20 PM |
Fuji S2 and Metz 44 Mz-2 Flash | elchief | In The Darkroom | 3 | April 7th 04 10:20 AM |
Bellows question | T R | In The Darkroom | 4 | March 10th 04 04:48 PM |
Opinions on Jobo LPL C 7700 Color Enlarger & Other Equipment | Andrew McCall | In The Darkroom | 1 | February 23rd 04 08:34 AM |
MF resolution question | Faisal Bhua | Film & Labs | 42 | December 17th 03 02:14 PM |