If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a system, the practical and the philosophical
PeterN wrote:
On 1/29/2013 12:29 PM, Floyd L. Davidson wrote: PeterN wrote: On 1/29/2013 11:49 AM, Floyd L. Davidson wrote: Wow. I had not looked at specs for the D600, and that is fascinating! The D800 and D4 are very different, with 2 to 9 steps that are 1/3, 1/2, 2/3, and 1 EV apart. As I noted previously, the D7000 has 2 EV steps for bracketing, so it and the D600 are the only Nikon that I know of that have increments larger than 1 EV. But the size of the increment is not all that important by itself, and the actual functionality also depends on the number of shots that are in a bracketed set. The size of the increment can be quite important, especially if shooting for HDR. It allows one to take fewer shots to achieve the same result, with less chance of camera motion. But as I said, and have shown, the size of the increment is not all that important by itself. You certainly are not going to claim, we might hope, that the D4 is not more functional than the D600! You must really be bored. Why owuld you even mention something that I didn't say or imply. Your statement did in fact imply rather strongly that the D600, with increments of 1, 2, and 3 EV is more useful for HDR than the D4 that does not have increments of 2 or 3 EV. That is false, because the D600 cannot shoot +/- 4 EV bracketing automatically, and the D4 can. What you stated is simply ignorant. As pointed out the increment size *and* the number of steps are each only of significance when both are known. The increment size is *not* more significant for HDR than the number of steps (nor is the number of steps more important). It is the combination that determines the available functionality. The claim that with fewer shots there is less chance of camera motion is specious. If one shoots 3 shots that must register perfectly, or 9, either way the camera necessarily must be mounted on a rock solid support. If the camera will move with 9 shots, it will also move with 3. This isn't done hand holding the camera... -- Floyd L. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a system, the practical and the philosophical
On 1/29/2013 7:43 PM, Floyd L. Davidson wrote:
PeterN wrote: On 1/29/2013 12:29 PM, Floyd L. Davidson wrote: PeterN wrote: On 1/29/2013 11:49 AM, Floyd L. Davidson wrote: Wow. I had not looked at specs for the D600, and that is fascinating! The D800 and D4 are very different, with 2 to 9 steps that are 1/3, 1/2, 2/3, and 1 EV apart. As I noted previously, the D7000 has 2 EV steps for bracketing, so it and the D600 are the only Nikon that I know of that have increments larger than 1 EV. But the size of the increment is not all that important by itself, and the actual functionality also depends on the number of shots that are in a bracketed set. The size of the increment can be quite important, especially if shooting for HDR. It allows one to take fewer shots to achieve the same result, with less chance of camera motion. But as I said, and have shown, the size of the increment is not all that important by itself. You certainly are not going to claim, we might hope, that the D4 is not more functional than the D600! You must really be bored. Why owuld you even mention something that I didn't say or imply. Your statement did in fact imply rather strongly that the D600, with increments of 1, 2, and 3 EV is more useful for HDR than the D4 that does not have increments of 2 or 3 EV. That is false, because the D600 cannot shoot +/- 4 EV bracketing automatically, and the D4 can. What you stated is simply ignorant. As pointed out the increment size *and* the number of steps are each only of significance when both are known. The increment size is *not* more significant for HDR than the number of steps (nor is the number of steps more important). It is the combination that determines the available functionality. The claim that with fewer shots there is less chance of camera motion is specious. If one shoots 3 shots that must register perfectly, or 9, either way the camera necessarily must be mounted on a rock solid support. If the camera will move with 9 shots, it will also move with 3. This isn't done hand holding the camera... typically, you are displaying your arrogance, coupled with ignorance. The ideal HDR spread is 4 stops.2 under one on and 2 over. As I stated above If that can be achieved with 3 images, there is less chance of ghosting due to camera movement. While the D600 can accomplish this with three shots, the D800 and the D4 require five shots. As to the D600 being better than the D4, again you are accusing me of saying something I never said. Typically you then take off and bluster about why I am wrong. BTW is is done hand holding, sometimes there is no choice. Besides, even if the camera is mounted on the most rigid tripod, it could still be subject to movement. Yes toady's software can handle a certain amount of ghosting, but for a better image, I prefer to get it as close to right in camera. -- PeterN |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a system, the practical and the philosophical
PeterN wrote:
On 1/29/2013 7:43 PM, Floyd L. Davidson wrote: PeterN wrote: On 1/29/2013 12:29 PM, Floyd L. Davidson wrote: PeterN wrote: On 1/29/2013 11:49 AM, Floyd L. Davidson wrote: Wow. I had not looked at specs for the D600, and that is fascinating! The D800 and D4 are very different, with 2 to 9 steps that are 1/3, 1/2, 2/3, and 1 EV apart. As I noted previously, the D7000 has 2 EV steps for bracketing, so it and the D600 are the only Nikon that I know of that have increments larger than 1 EV. But the size of the increment is not all that important by itself, and the actual functionality also depends on the number of shots that are in a bracketed set. The size of the increment can be quite important, especially if shooting for HDR. It allows one to take fewer shots to achieve the same result, with less chance of camera motion. But as I said, and have shown, the size of the increment is not all that important by itself. You certainly are not going to claim, we might hope, that the D4 is not more functional than the D600! You must really be bored. Why owuld you even mention something that I didn't say or imply. Your statement did in fact imply rather strongly that the D600, with increments of 1, 2, and 3 EV is more useful for HDR than the D4 that does not have increments of 2 or 3 EV. That is false, because the D600 cannot shoot +/- 4 EV bracketing automatically, and the D4 can. What you stated is simply ignorant. As pointed out the increment size *and* the number of steps are each only of significance when both are known. The increment size is *not* more significant for HDR than the number of steps (nor is the number of steps more important). It is the combination that determines the available functionality. The claim that with fewer shots there is less chance of camera motion is specious. If one shoots 3 shots that must register perfectly, or 9, either way the camera necessarily must be mounted on a rock solid support. If the camera will move with 9 shots, it will also move with 3. This isn't done hand holding the camera... typically, you are displaying your arrogance, coupled with ignorance. The ideal HDR spread is 4 stops.2 under one on and 2 over. As I stated above If that can be achieved with 3 images, there is less chance of ghosting due to camera movement. BS. While the D600 can accomplish this with three shots, the D800 and the D4 require five shots. As to the D600 being better than the D4, again you are accusing me of saying something I never said. Typically you then take off and bluster about why I am wrong. That is exactly what you implied to start with, and again just above. BTW is is done hand holding, sometimes there is no choice. If you make the wrong choices, don't blame the equipment. Besides, even if the camera is mounted on the most rigid tripod, it could still be subject to movement. Yes toady's software can handle a certain amount of ghosting, but for a better image, I prefer to get it as close to right in camera. Then you would enjoy using a D800 vs a D600. -- Floyd L. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a system, the practical and the philosophical
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a system, the practical and the philosophical
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a system, the practical and the philosophical
On 1/29/2013 8:34 PM, Floyd L. Davidson wrote:
PeterN wrote: On 1/29/2013 7:43 PM, Floyd L. Davidson wrote: PeterN wrote: On 1/29/2013 12:29 PM, Floyd L. Davidson wrote: PeterN wrote: On 1/29/2013 11:49 AM, Floyd L. Davidson wrote: Wow. I had not looked at specs for the D600, and that is fascinating! The D800 and D4 are very different, with 2 to 9 steps that are 1/3, 1/2, 2/3, and 1 EV apart. As I noted previously, the D7000 has 2 EV steps for bracketing, so it and the D600 are the only Nikon that I know of that have increments larger than 1 EV. But the size of the increment is not all that important by itself, and the actual functionality also depends on the number of shots that are in a bracketed set. The size of the increment can be quite important, especially if shooting for HDR. It allows one to take fewer shots to achieve the same result, with less chance of camera motion. But as I said, and have shown, the size of the increment is not all that important by itself. You certainly are not going to claim, we might hope, that the D4 is not more functional than the D600! You must really be bored. Why owuld you even mention something that I didn't say or imply. Your statement did in fact imply rather strongly that the D600, with increments of 1, 2, and 3 EV is more useful for HDR than the D4 that does not have increments of 2 or 3 EV. That is false, because the D600 cannot shoot +/- 4 EV bracketing automatically, and the D4 can. What you stated is simply ignorant. As pointed out the increment size *and* the number of steps are each only of significance when both are known. The increment size is *not* more significant for HDR than the number of steps (nor is the number of steps more important). It is the combination that determines the available functionality. The claim that with fewer shots there is less chance of camera motion is specious. If one shoots 3 shots that must register perfectly, or 9, either way the camera necessarily must be mounted on a rock solid support. If the camera will move with 9 shots, it will also move with 3. This isn't done hand holding the camera... typically, you are displaying your arrogance, coupled with ignorance. The ideal HDR spread is 4 stops.2 under one on and 2 over. As I stated above If that can be achieved with 3 images, there is less chance of ghosting due to camera movement. BS. Now that was a well thought out response. While the D600 can accomplish this with three shots, the D800 and the D4 require five shots. As to the D600 being better than the D4, again you are accusing me of saying something I never said. Typically you then take off and bluster about why I am wrong. That is exactly what you implied to start with, and again just above. Assuming that there are no other qualifications. Which assumption you seem to be making, not I. BTW is is done hand holding, sometimes there is no choice. If you make the wrong choices, don't blame the equipment. Huh! Besides, even if the camera is mounted on the most rigid tripod, it could still be subject to movement. Yes toady's software can handle a certain amount of ghosting, but for a better image, I prefer to get it as close to right in camera. Then you would enjoy using a D800 vs a D600. You are right. I definitely enjoy using my D800. Didn't even consider the D600. I did consider the D4, but decided to put the difference towards some good glass. -- PeterN |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a system, the practical and the philosophical
wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jan 2013 16:05:54 -0900, (Floyd L. Davidson) wrote: PeterN wrote: Most Canon cameras will allow 2 stop bracketing, in the Nikon line, I think only the D4 has that feature. Most Nikons have only 1 stop bracketing. Nikon cameras have various different bracketing options. The entry level 3000 series does not have bracketing of any kind. The 5000 series has 3 steps of up to 1/2 EV per step. The D7000 also has 3 steps, but they can be up to 2 EV per step too. The high end models, from the D300 to the D800 and the D4 all have 9 steps at up to 1 EV per step. That means the camera can be set to high speed continuous with a maximum of 9 frames, and with Auto Bracketing set to 9 steps 1 EV apart each press of the shutter will bracket from -4 EV to +4 EV. I would assume that various Canon models are just as functional, but I don't know. The Nikon D600 has up to 3 shots, with up to 3 stops increment per shot, but the center shot is as dialed in, so you can have the set exposure plus up to 3 stops below and 3 stops above. Or you can set it to 2 shots with 1 at proper exposure and the other one off. That is the way all Nikon models function, with of course differring numbers of shot and sizes for the steps. The D700 had up to 5 shots, but I don't remember the maximum increment... I used to shoot at 1 stop or less anyway. The D700 has 2-9 shots, with up to 1 EV steps. The D700 is exactly the same as the D800, the D4 and all of the high end Nikons from the D2X onward. The D1 had 2-3 shots with up to 1 EV steps. -- Floyd L. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a system, the practical and the philosophical
wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 07:49:52 -0900, (Floyd L. Davidson) wrote: Because bodies like the D800 and D4 can shoot 9 shot brackets, and in High Speed Continous mode the camera can be set to stop at 9 shots, it is easy to actually bracket at +/- 4 EV with those cameras. And that is a greater spread than the D600 can get shooting three shots with 3 EV steps. I don't think the D800 shoots faster than the D600... and I don't think the D4 is 3 times faster than the D600... you're a little optimistic! Who said anything at all about faster? Was the reference to using "High Speed Continuous" a cause of confusion? That merely provides the fastest rate that the camera will shoot, whatever it happens to be. (The fastest rate possible is better in order to avoid any change is the scene during the time a set of exposures is taken.) The camera can be configured for the maximum number of shots that will be taken with a single press of the shutter button in a continuous mode. Hence, if the bracketing is set to a specific number of shots, regardless of the size of the step per shot, and the camera is in a Continuous mode with a maximum number of exposures that equals the number set in backeting... a full bracketed set is automatically made with a single press of the shutter release button. The point made was that the D4 and D800 can be set to shoot 9 shots with each 1 EV apart. That provides an automatic bracketed range of +4 EV to -4 EV. That cannot be done with the D600. It can be set to 3 shots at most, and with each at most 3 EV apart, providing only +3 EV to -3 EV. Speed has nothing at all to do with that discussion. -- Floyd L. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Choosing a system, the practical and the philosophical
PeterN wrote:
On 1/29/2013 8:52 PM, wrote: On Tue, 29 Jan 2013 07:49:52 -0900, (Floyd L. Davidson) wrote: Because bodies like the D800 and D4 can shoot 9 shot brackets, and in High Speed Continous mode the camera can be set to stop at 9 shots, it is easy to actually bracket at +/- 4 EV with those cameras. And that is a greater spread than the D600 can get shooting three shots with 3 EV steps. I don't think the D800 shoots faster than the D600... and I don't think the D4 is 3 times faster than the D600... you're a little optimistic! It doesn't. Frame rate on the D600 is 5.5. The D800 frame rate is 4. (Assuming that neither has a battery pack.) So what? It doesn't make any difference and was not part of the discussion. -- Floyd L. Davidson http://www.apaflo.com/floyd_davidson Ukpeagvik (Barrow, Alaska) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
iPad practical jokes | C J Campbell[_2_] | Digital SLR Cameras | 5 | April 12th 10 07:20 PM |
Is looking at 100% crop practical? | Rod Williams | Digital SLR Cameras | 11 | September 6th 06 07:35 PM |
Deconvolution software, any practical value? | Rich | Digital Photography | 11 | March 7th 06 03:55 PM |
Practical Holography | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 9 | November 14th 05 11:42 PM |
Question about choosing contax system | Patrick Leung | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 53 | September 7th 04 03:59 PM |