If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Palace of Fine Arts
http://img250.imageshack.us/img250/9812/p1030674qy8.jpg
-- Best regards, John Navas Panasonic DMC-FZ8 (and several others) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Palace of Fine Arts
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 08:44:23 GMT, John Navas wrote:
http://img250.imageshack.us/img250/9812/p1030674qy8.jpg Finally. It's about time that you came to your senses and dumped that POS P&S camera and got a decent D-SLR and L-glass. You must have at least used an f/1.4 prime lens to get that much detail in the buildings' shadows at night. I suspect your camera has a full-frame CMOS sensor too considering the low noise levels. You must've had to use pretty high ISOs to get that image. Nice example. Now if only P&S cameras could do that well. :-) |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Palace of Fine Arts
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 09:13:38 +0000, DustinR. wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 08:44:23 GMT, John Navas wrote: http://img250.imageshack.us/img250/9812/p1030674qy8.jpg Finally. It's about time that you came to your senses and dumped that POS P&S camera and got a decent D-SLR and L-glass. You must have at least used an f/1.4 prime lens to get that much detail in the buildings' shadows at night. I suspect your camera has a full-frame CMOS sensor too considering the low noise levels. You must've had to use pretty high ISOs to get that image. Nice example. Now if only P&S cameras could do that well. :-) Ha,ha,ha. P&S lesson 101! Six second exposure sure would have cramped your hand... Should have used a tripod! Douglas -- If you don't defend your rights... You end up without any! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Palace of Fine Arts
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 08:44:23 GMT, John Navas wrote:
http://img250.imageshack.us/img250/9812/p1030674qy8.jpg The silence is deafening. :-) Where oh where are all the DSLR advocates? See, this is why I don't post mine, it's just too easy to shut them up. There goes all the fun. :-) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Palace of Fine Arts
In article ,
DustinR. wrote: On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 08:44:23 GMT, John Navas wrote: http://img250.imageshack.us/img250/9812/p1030674qy8.jpg Finally. It's about time that you came to your senses and dumped that POS P&S camera and got a decent D-SLR and L-glass. You must have at least used an f/1.4 prime lens to get that much detail in the buildings' shadows at night. I suspect your camera has a full-frame CMOS sensor too considering the low noise levels. You must've had to use pretty high ISOs to get that image. Nice example. Now if only P&S cameras could do that well. :-) http://www.pixelmemory.us/Photos/SF%...g%2024%202002/ Taken back in 2002 on the SF Bay Photo Group's second meeting - when I had a P&S |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Palace of Fine Arts
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 21:26:17 -0800, Kevin McMurtrie
wrote in : In article , DustinR. wrote: On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 08:44:23 GMT, John Navas wrote: http://img250.imageshack.us/img250/9812/p1030674qy8.jpg Finally. It's about time that you came to your senses and dumped that POS P&S camera and got a decent D-SLR and L-glass. You must have at least used an f/1.4 prime lens to get that much detail in the buildings' shadows at night. I suspect your camera has a full-frame CMOS sensor too considering the low noise levels. You must've had to use pretty high ISOs to get that image. Nice example. Now if only P&S cameras could do that well. :-) http://www.pixelmemory.us/Photos/SF%...g%2024%202002/ Taken back in 2002 on the SF Bay Photo Group's second meeting - when I had a P&S You really think http://www.pixelmemory.us/Photos/SF%20Bay%20Photo/Aug%2024%202002/011.JPG measures up to my image? p.s. You apparently missed the sarcasm and leaped to conclusions -- my image was taken with my FZ8. -- Best regards, John Navas Panasonic DMC-FZ8 (and several others) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Palace of Fine Arts
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 01:19:41 GMT, John Navas wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 21:26:17 -0800, Kevin McMurtrie wrote in : In article , DustinR. wrote: On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 08:44:23 GMT, John Navas wrote: http://img250.imageshack.us/img250/9812/p1030674qy8.jpg Finally. It's about time that you came to your senses and dumped that POS P&S camera and got a decent D-SLR and L-glass. You must have at least used an f/1.4 prime lens to get that much detail in the buildings' shadows at night. I suspect your camera has a full-frame CMOS sensor too considering the low noise levels. You must've had to use pretty high ISOs to get that image. Nice example. Now if only P&S cameras could do that well. :-) http://www.pixelmemory.us/Photos/SF%...g%2024%202002/ Taken back in 2002 on the SF Bay Photo Group's second meeting - when I had a P&S You really think http://www.pixelmemory.us/Photos/SF%20Bay%20Photo/Aug%2024%202002/011.JPG measures up to my image? p.s. You apparently missed the sarcasm and leaped to conclusions -- my image was taken with my FZ8. Awww shucks, now you went and spoiled all the fun. :-) I've got some remarkable P&S aurora photos and constellation photos. One that I'm particularly fond of. A rainbow hued moonset on a remote island-dotted, mirror-still, lake that takes your breath away. You have no idea how difficult it was to under-expose that one just right to get it to look like a moonset and not just another sunset. That is the biggest challenge of the thousands of moonlit photos that I've taken with my P&S cameras, capturing too much light rather than too little. If I shared any of those at full resolution the suicide rates in the DSLR camps would drastically rise. I refrain from posting those so as not to completely challenge their mental-health (what's left of it). Interesting in that the deafening silence from the DSLR proponents persists. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Palace of Fine Arts
OK - I'll be the first of the DSLR guys to comment - Nice shot.
On Nov 18 2007 10:09 PM, DustinR. wrote: On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 01:19:41 GMT, John Navas wrote: On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 21:26:17 -0800, Kevin McMurtrie wrote in : In article , DustinR. wrote: On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 08:44:23 GMT, John Navas wrote: http://img250.imageshack.us/img250/9812/p1030674qy8.jpg Finally. It's about time that you came to your senses and dumped that POS P&S camera and got a decent D-SLR and L-glass. You must have at least used an f/1.4 prime lens to get that much detail in the buildings' shadows at night. I suspect your camera has a full-frame CMOS sensor too considering the low noise levels. You must've had to use pretty high ISOs to get that image. Nice example. Now if only P&S cameras could do that well. :-) http://www.pixelmemory.us/Photos/SF%...g%2024%202002/ Taken back in 2002 on the SF Bay Photo Group's second meeting - when I had a P&S You really think http://www.pixelmemory.us/Photos/SF%20Bay%20Photo/Aug%2024%202002/011.JPG measures up to my image? p.s. You apparently missed the sarcasm and leaped to conclusions -- my image was taken with my FZ8. Awww shucks, now you went and spoiled all the fun. :-) I've got some remarkable P&S aurora photos and constellation photos. One that I'm particularly fond of. A rainbow hued moonset on a remote island-dotted, mirror-still, lake that takes your breath away. You have no idea how difficult it was to under-expose that one just right to get it to look like a moonset and not just another sunset. That is the biggest challenge of the thousands of moonlit photos that I've taken with my P&S cameras, capturing too much light rather than too little. If I shared any of those at full resolution the suicide rates in the DSLR camps would drastically rise. I refrain from posting those so as not to completely challenge their mental-health (what's left of it). Interesting in that the deafening silence from the DSLR proponents persists. --------* : the next generation of web-newsreaders : http://www.recgroups.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Palace of Fine Arts
On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 06:54:30 -0800, "Juan Moore Beer"
wrote in : OK - I'll be the first of the DSLR guys to comment - Nice shot. Thank you. Of course DSLRs take nice shots too. What matters is the photographer, not the tool. -- Best regards, John Navas Panasonic DMC-FZ8 (and several others) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Palace of Fine Arts
In article ,
John Navas wrote: On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 21:26:17 -0800, Kevin McMurtrie wrote in : In article , DustinR. wrote: On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 08:44:23 GMT, John Navas wrote: http://img250.imageshack.us/img250/9812/p1030674qy8.jpg Finally. It's about time that you came to your senses and dumped that POS P&S camera and got a decent D-SLR and L-glass. You must have at least used an f/1.4 prime lens to get that much detail in the buildings' shadows at night. I suspect your camera has a full-frame CMOS sensor too considering the low noise levels. You must've had to use pretty high ISOs to get that image. Nice example. Now if only P&S cameras could do that well. :-) http://www.pixelmemory.us/Photos/SF%...g%2024%202002/ Taken back in 2002 on the SF Bay Photo Group's second meeting - when I had a P&S You really think http://www.pixelmemory.us/Photos/SF%20Bay%20Photo/Aug%2024%202002/011.JPG measures up to my image? p.s. You apparently missed the sarcasm and leaped to conclusions -- my image was taken with my FZ8. I was playing along, actually. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Just See the Photographes of Royal Palace of Ruler of Abu Dhabi | Stella | Digital Photography | 5 | November 19th 06 11:44 PM |
New Master of Fine Arts (MFA) Program in New Media, Low Residency | dr. klaus knoll | Fine Art, Framing and Display | 0 | April 20th 04 11:28 AM |
New Master of Fine Arts (MFA) Program in New Media, Low Residency | dr. klaus knoll | Large Format Equipment For Sale | 0 | April 20th 04 11:28 AM |
New Master of Fine Arts (MFA) Program in New Media, Low Residency | dr. klaus knoll | Medium Format Equipment For Sale | 0 | April 20th 04 11:28 AM |
FA: 1890 Stereoviews of Corn Palace - ends Jan12 04 | ironchefphil | General Equipment For Sale | 0 | January 7th 04 02:23 AM |