Olympus Point and Shoot out performs DSLRs

On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:03:11 -0800, -hh wrote:

A trolling sockpuppet gets some of his life wasted on an errant
diversion
Douglas wrote:

[supposedly, the EXIF data of the image in question]

...
Exif Image Width = 2048
Exif Image Height = 1536

Gosh, its pretty trivial to see that the image online is only 720 x 369.

Thus, your claimed EXIF data (that's not from the posted image) fails to
match the posted image by an incredibly wide margin. Golly, gee - how
can this be?

Didn't think you were quite this inept when it came to trying to making
a fake, but seems that I underestimated your stupidity. My apologies.


-hh

Why on earth would I want to resize an original image?
The "on-line" one is like every other image on the Internet, done over
with an image editor and had the EXIF data removed before posting.

You really ought to get a life, this one is making you into a joker.

Douglas



--
If you don't defend your rights... You end up without any!

On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 22:10:08 +0000 (UTC), Douglas
wrote in
:

The "on-line" one is like every other image on the Internet, done over
with an image editor and had the EXIF data removed before posting.

There are actually lots of images on the Internet that contain EXIF
data, many resized, some full resolution.

--
Best regards,
John Navas
Panasonic DMC-FZ8 (and several others)

On Nov 16, 12:27 am, Don Stauffer in Minnesota
wrote:

Why must this group be so competitive? It used to be the "film

another moron with no clue as to the difference
between singuylar and plural...

On Nov 15, 11:51 pm, Harold Hughes - Activity Director
wrote:


If you ever get the first link going make sure you have your sunglasses
on. The whites are pretty bright.

er.... what are they supposed to be? Dark green?

On Nov 15, 11:59 pm, "PCs Rule" wrote:

I would never admit to taking that pic in the first link. To put it mildly,
I think it sucks.


given you never shown the ability to take ANY pics,
that is really no surprise...

On Nov 16, 9:28 pm, wrote:


There's something wonderful about a good Olympus lens, and they have
made quite a few that fall into that category.

I still got a soft spot to get a 21/om2 combo.
one day...

On Nov 16, 5:48 pm, Noons wrote:


Why must this group be so competitive? It used to be the "film

another moron with no clue as to the difference
between singuylar and plural...

"Singuylar?"

Not only does your post make no sense, you can't spell for ****,
either.

On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 17:21:21 -0800 (PST), Annika1980
wrote in
:

On Nov 16, 5:48 pm, Noons wrote:


Why must this group be so competitive? It used to be the "film

another moron with no clue as to the difference
between singuylar and plural...

"Singuylar?"

Not only does your post make no sense, you can't spell for ****,
either.

Your post wasn't any more substantive. How about skipping the
spellcopping and sticking to digital cameras?

--
Best regards,
John Navas
Panasonic DMC-FZ8 (and several others)

On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:51:39 -0800 (PST), Noons
wrote in
:

On Nov 15, 11:59 pm, "PCs Rule" wrote:

I would never admit to taking that pic in the first link. To put it mildly,
I think it sucks.

given you never shown the ability to take ANY pics,
that is really no surprise...

Could you all please take this to kind of thing to alt.insults-gangbang?
[follow-up set] When posting here, please have at least a tiny bit of
relevant content to relieve the monotony of the insults. Thanks!

--
Best regards,
John Navas http:/navasgroup.com

"Usenet is like a herd of performing elephants with diarrhea - massive,
difficult to redirect, awe inspiring, entertaining, and a source of mind
boggling amounts of excrement when you least expect it." --Gene Spafford

On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 11:55:33 GMT, Jake Helms
wrote:

On Thu, 15 Nov 2007 06:32:48 -0500, "Mark B." wrote:

I find it amusing that you feel the need to put down an entire group of
owners with every post. Why are you so insecure?


The DSLR fools can dish it out, but they can't take it, eh?

What it comes down to is this:

Many DSLR owners can ONLY justify their expenditure for a DSLR
by minimizing the usefulness of a P&S.