A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Depth of field - two of them?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61  
Old January 20th 19, 02:57 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Commander Kinsey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 548
Default Depth of field - two of them?

On Sun, 20 Jan 2019 14:31:19 -0000, David B. "David wrote:

On 19/01/2019 19:43, Commander Kinsey wrote:

Yes, unlike a lot of people, my filters remove replies to people I don't
like.


Now, completely off topic ....

Did *YOU* make this video?

https://www.facebook.com/SweetBabieF...4302204639493/

If not, you could probably make one much like it! ;-)


Indeed, my cats are also that stupid, in particular they really cannot grasp Newton's third law of motion (equal and opposite reactions). As in why the hell did the box I just leapt off fly in the other direction and knock everything over, scare the hell out of my sister, and cause her to leap in the air, scare me, and make me knock something else over? I really don't understand how any animal without a basic grasp of its surroundings can survive, perhaps quick reactions.
  #62  
Old January 20th 19, 03:17 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
David B.[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 117
Default Depth of field - two of them?

On 20/01/2019 14:57, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jan 2019 14:31:19 -0000, David B. "David
wrote:

On 19/01/2019 19:43, Commander Kinsey wrote:

Yes, unlike a lot of people, my filters remove replies to people I don't
like.


Now, completely off topic ....

Did *YOU* make this video?

https://www.facebook.com/SweetBabieF...4302204639493/

If not, you could probably make one much like it! ;-)


Indeed, my cats are also that stupid, in particular they really cannot
grasp Newton's third law of motion (equal and opposite reactions).* As
in why the hell did the box I just leapt off fly in the other direction
and knock everything over, scare the hell out of my sister, and cause
her to leap in the air, scare me, and make me knock something else
over?* I really don't understand how any animal without a basic grasp of
its surroundings can survive, perhaps quick reactions.


Indeed!

I've always been fascinated by the clips showing a cat 'meeting' a
cucumber! ;-)

--
David B.
  #63  
Old January 20th 19, 03:51 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Commander Kinsey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 548
Default Depth of field - two of them?

On Sun, 20 Jan 2019 15:17:42 -0000, David B. "David wrote:

On 20/01/2019 14:57, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jan 2019 14:31:19 -0000, David B. "David
wrote:

On 19/01/2019 19:43, Commander Kinsey wrote:

Yes, unlike a lot of people, my filters remove replies to people I don't
like.

Now, completely off topic ....

Did *YOU* make this video?

https://www.facebook.com/SweetBabieF...4302204639493/

If not, you could probably make one much like it! ;-)


Indeed, my cats are also that stupid, in particular they really cannot
grasp Newton's third law of motion (equal and opposite reactions). As
in why the hell did the box I just leapt off fly in the other direction
and knock everything over, scare the hell out of my sister, and cause
her to leap in the air, scare me, and make me knock something else
over? I really don't understand how any animal without a basic grasp of
its surroundings can survive, perhaps quick reactions.


Indeed!

I've always been fascinated by the clips showing a cat 'meeting' a
cucumber! ;-)


So have I, so I tried it. Evidently my cats aren't quite that stupid. They just ignored it completely. Not sure why a cucumber should scare a cat any more than any other object. All I can find on google is it's either something "sneaking up on them", so why not anything else like a book placed next to them?, or it looks like a snake (but pet cats have never seen a snake so that doesn't make sense either.).
  #64  
Old January 20th 19, 03:57 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Commander Kinsey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 548
Default Depth of field - two of them?

On Sun, 20 Jan 2019 15:51:52 -0000, Commander Kinsey wrote:

On Sun, 20 Jan 2019 15:17:42 -0000, David B. "David wrote:

On 20/01/2019 14:57, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sun, 20 Jan 2019 14:31:19 -0000, David B. "David
wrote:

On 19/01/2019 19:43, Commander Kinsey wrote:

Yes, unlike a lot of people, my filters remove replies to people I don't
like.

Now, completely off topic ....

Did *YOU* make this video?

https://www.facebook.com/SweetBabieF...4302204639493/

If not, you could probably make one much like it! ;-)

Indeed, my cats are also that stupid, in particular they really cannot
grasp Newton's third law of motion (equal and opposite reactions). As
in why the hell did the box I just leapt off fly in the other direction
and knock everything over, scare the hell out of my sister, and cause
her to leap in the air, scare me, and make me knock something else
over? I really don't understand how any animal without a basic grasp of
its surroundings can survive, perhaps quick reactions.


Indeed!

I've always been fascinated by the clips showing a cat 'meeting' a
cucumber! ;-)


So have I, so I tried it. Evidently my cats aren't quite that stupid. They just ignored it completely. Not sure why a cucumber should scare a cat any more than any other object. All I can find on google is it's either something "sneaking up on them", so why not anything else like a book placed next to them?, or it looks like a snake (but pet cats have never seen a snake so that doesn't make sense either.).


Looks like 2/3rds of cats are scared of them: https://youtu.be/agi4geKb8v8
Strangely all 7 of mine I tested it on were not scared - perhaps it's the way they're brought up?
  #65  
Old January 20th 19, 07:20 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
PeterN[_7_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,161
Default Depth of field - two of them?

On 1/19/2019 6:22 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 22:10:53 -0000,Â* wrote:



snip

...but if you care to go ahead, who am I to stop you


I can only comment on what I've seen between David and Diesel.Â* Diesel
appears to be an utter arsehole.


I don't read either of them.

--
PeterN
  #66  
Old January 20th 19, 07:43 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
David B.[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 117
Default Depth of field - two of them?

On 20/01/2019 19:20, PeterN wrote:
On 1/19/2019 6:22 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 22:10:53 -0000,Â* wrote:



snip

...but if you care to go ahead, who am I to stop you


I can only comment on what I've seen between David and Diesel.Â* Diesel
appears to be an utter arsehole.


I don't read either of them.


You should read *ME*! (I'm the GOOD guy!)

THIS is for you, Peter ..... https://goo.gl/SUkH8j

It's about CATS! :-D

--
David B.
  #67  
Old January 20th 19, 07:57 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
nospam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24,165
Default Depth of field - two of them?

In article , PeterN
wrote:

I can only comment on what I've seen between David and Diesel.* Diesel
appears to be an utter arsehole.


I don't read either of them.


then you can't comment at all.
  #68  
Old January 20th 19, 07:57 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
nospam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24,165
Default Depth of field - two of them?

In article , David B.
wrote:

I can only comment on what I've seen between David and Diesel.* Diesel
appears to be an utter arsehole.


I don't read either of them.


You should read *ME*! (I'm the GOOD guy!)


'read' is the wrong word, and no.

THIS is for you, Peter ..... https://


do not click his links.
  #69  
Old January 20th 19, 08:05 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Troll Finder
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default TROLL post

'nospam' is a *TROLL*

98% of what he posts is *WRONG*!
  #70  
Old January 20th 19, 08:07 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
nospam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24,165
Default TROLL post

In article , Troll Finder
wrote:

'nospam' is a *TROLL*

98% of what he posts is *WRONG*!


oh look, david b under a new nym.

now who is the troll...
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Depth of Field Ray Paseur[_3_] Digital SLR Cameras 13 January 24th 08 08:43 PM
P & S and depth-of-field Jeff Layman Digital Photography 16 November 9th 07 05:54 PM
Depth Of Field Matalog Digital Photography 17 January 19th 06 03:22 PM
Depth of field Armando Digital Photography 20 November 19th 05 09:01 PM
Depth of field rda Digital Photography 12 January 1st 05 06:29 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.