If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
Ripe Apples
In article , Eric Stevens
wrote: I didn't need to do that, doesn't you're monitor take up space too. You see one of the advantages of an all in one design is that yuo don;t need that box yuo call a destop, we even went for that design in our PC lab when we brought about 30 dell 9030. First of all I can't buy an all in one with the same spec as what I have got. in about a month, you will be able to buy an all-in-one that blows away whatever you have. Second you can't replace the screen with another of different spec while retaining your existing hardware. so what? the screen doesn't normally fail and the retina display is *much* better than what you have. |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Ripe Apples
On 11/13/2017 7:27 PM, nospam wrote:
In article , Eric Stevens wrote: I didn't need to do that, doesn't you're monitor take up space too. You see one of the advantages of an all in one design is that yuo don;t need that box yuo call a destop, we even went for that design in our PC lab when we brought about 30 dell 9030. First of all I can't buy an all in one with the same spec as what I have got. in about a month, you will be able to buy an all-in-one that blows away whatever you have. Second you can't replace the screen with another of different spec while retaining your existing hardware. so what? the screen doesn't normally fail and the retina display is *much* better than what you have. Do you really need a screen of that density, when your images are going to be seen on screens with much lower density? -- PeterN |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Ripe Apples
In article , PeterN
wrote: Second you can't replace the screen with another of different spec while retaining your existing hardware. so what? the screen doesn't normally fail and the retina display is *much* better than what you have. Do you really need a screen of that density, when your images are going to be seen on screens with much lower density? yes. |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Ripe Apples
On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 19:27:23 -0500, nospam
wrote: In article , Eric Stevens wrote: I didn't need to do that, doesn't you're monitor take up space too. You see one of the advantages of an all in one design is that yuo don;t need that box yuo call a destop, we even went for that design in our PC lab when we brought about 30 dell 9030. First of all I can't buy an all in one with the same spec as what I have got. in about a month, you will be able to buy an all-in-one that blows away whatever you have. That's always the case. Second you can't replace the screen with another of different spec while retaining your existing hardware. so what? the screen doesn't normally fail and the retina display is *much* better than what you have. Is it a matte display or only semi-gloss? -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Ripe Apples
In article , Eric Stevens
wrote: I didn't need to do that, doesn't you're monitor take up space too. You see one of the advantages of an all in one design is that yuo don;t need that box yuo call a destop, we even went for that design in our PC lab when we brought about 30 dell 9030. First of all I can't buy an all in one with the same spec as what I have got. in about a month, you will be able to buy an all-in-one that blows away whatever you have. That's always the case. no it isn't. the imac pro comes out next month and will raise the bar. again. Second you can't replace the screen with another of different spec while retaining your existing hardware. so what? the screen doesn't normally fail and the retina display is *much* better than what you have. Is it a matte display or only semi-gloss? it's a 10 bpc retina wide gamut display that is considered to be the best in the biz by pretty much everyone. it really is *that* good. you won't notice any glossiness or lack thereof unless it's off, which is not how a display of any sort is intended to be used. |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Ripe Apples
On Mon, 13 Nov 2017 22:52:06 -0500, nospam
wrote: Is it a matte display or only semi-gloss? it's a 10 bpc retina wide gamut display that is considered to be the best in the biz by pretty much everyone. it really is *that* good. you won't notice any glossiness or lack thereof unless it's off, which is not how a display of any sort is intended to be used. I suppose that in the future you will claim to have answered my question. -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Ripe Apples
In article , Eric Stevens
wrote: Is it a matte display or only semi-gloss? it's a 10 bpc retina wide gamut display that is considered to be the best in the biz by pretty much everyone. it really is *that* good. you won't notice any glossiness or lack thereof unless it's off, which is not how a display of any sort is intended to be used. I suppose that in the future you will claim to have answered my question. or the present. it's stupid to get a superb high resolution display and then blur it with a matte coating. you *won't* notice the finish of the display while using it. you're looking for excuses. |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Ripe Apples
On 11/13/2017 9:50 PM, nospam wrote:
In article , PeterN wrote: Second you can't replace the screen with another of different spec while retaining your existing hardware. so what? the screen doesn't normally fail and the retina display is *much* better than what you have. Do you really need a screen of that density, when your images are going to be seen on screens with much lower density? yes. Why. What is the benefit, except for the user liking it. -- PeterN |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Ripe Apples
In article , PeterN
wrote: Second you can't replace the screen with another of different spec while retaining your existing hardware. so what? the screen doesn't normally fail and the retina display is *much* better than what you have. Do you really need a screen of that density, when your images are going to be seen on screens with much lower density? yes. Why. What is the benefit, except for the user liking it. image quality. what is the benefit of your 36mp camera, versus a more affordable 24 mp? |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Ripe Apples
On 11/14/2017 6:56 AM, nospam wrote:
In article , Eric Stevens wrote: Is it a matte display or only semi-gloss? it's a 10 bpc retina wide gamut display that is considered to be the best in the biz by pretty much everyone. it really is *that* good. you won't notice any glossiness or lack thereof unless it's off, which is not how a display of any sort is intended to be used. I suppose that in the future you will claim to have answered my question. or the present. it's stupid to get a superb high resolution display and then blur it with a matte coating. you *won't* notice the finish of the display while using it. you're looking for excuses. And when using a gloss monitor, although the highlights and mid range colors are great, it is very difficult to see gradations of color in the shadow to dark areas. Most people may not care, but I do. I know the gloss on Apple branded monitors is not as high as it used to be, but I prefer to work on a matte surfaced monitor. Similarly, if I am submitting a print for a print competition, because of the configuration of the light boxes they are usually viewed under, I will print on a glossy surface, and underexpose by about a half stop. OTOH if the print is going to be hanging on a wall, I will usually use a matte paper. IOW I print for the conditions under which the image will be viewed. -- PeterN |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ripe Apples | Davoud | Digital Photography | 3 | November 9th 17 05:29 AM |
Apples, oranges, new crop of P&S's | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 1 | December 16th 07 07:04 AM |