If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
What constitutes a good portrait?
Okay, first of a series of questions relating to my dissertation. I am
polling photographic newsgroups in search of varying opinions, and anything said may be quoted. Q1: What constitutes a good portrait? Excluding basic technical considerations, i.e. longer focal lengths, wider apertures etc., what particular elements do you look for in taking and viewing people photographs? Do you have particular reasons for this opinion, or is it based purely on aesthetics? Please be as specific as possible. -- Here lies the late Martin Francis He couldn't tell you the technical merits of Leitz and Zeiss But he did take some photographs once. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
What constitutes a good portrait?
Technical merit must be there although following the rules is certainly
not a necessity. Beyond that, the point is to capture some semblance of the subject's personality. If you're doing it for money, then the photograph should flatter the subject. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
What constitutes a good portrait?
There is an excellent discussion of this question in the posthumously
published Dorothy Sayers novel, "Thrones and Dominations". Some character comments that in making a painted portrait, the painter has the advantage of the sum of many moments blended together to catch the character of the person whose portrait is being made. The painter can imbue the painting with personal, subjective impressions of the individual. By contrast, a photographic portrait selects one fleeting moment of the range of expressions possible to the subject and is unable to blend multiple observations into the image. The true art in photographic portraiture is, then, at least in my opinion, in finding a way to represent the subject as a particular personality and character. It is said of a Karsh portrait of Winston Churchill that Karsh walked over to Churchill, grabbed the cigar out of his mouth and took the picture as Churchill remained scowling. The famous bulldog personality shone through the image as a result. Along this line of thought, sometimes a prop is appropriate. There is a picture of Ansel Adams with his 8x10 camera as he stands on a truck roof to get a shot. This illustrates a good way to have the portrait integrate the human with his work. Some of the finest portraiture in the history of photography was done by a photographer with an absolute minimum of equipment and no artificial lighting apparatus. Julia Margaret Cameron managed great pictures even though she made her own glass slides, used a window in a barn for light control and had a rudimentary camera given to her by her daughter when she was about 50 years old. From this I conclude that while modern treatises on the use of artificial lighting for various effects in portraiture are excellent sources for ideas, still nothing beats the simple guideline that you have to know your subject. Francis A. Miniter Martin Francis wrote: Okay, first of a series of questions relating to my dissertation. I am polling photographic newsgroups in search of varying opinions, and anything said may be quoted. Q1: What constitutes a good portrait? Excluding basic technical considerations, i.e. longer focal lengths, wider apertures etc., what particular elements do you look for in taking and viewing people photographs? Do you have particular reasons for this opinion, or is it based purely on aesthetics? Please be as specific as possible. -- Here lies the late Martin Francis He couldn't tell you the technical merits of Leitz and Zeiss But he did take some photographs once. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
What constitutes a good portrait?
Okay, first of a series of questions relating to my dissertation. I am polling photographic newsgroups in search of varying opinions, and anything said may be quoted. Q1: What constitutes a good portrait? Excluding basic technical considerations, i.e. longer focal lengths, wider apertures etc., what particular elements do you look for in taking and viewing people photographs? Do you have particular reasons for this opinion, or is it based purely on aesthetics? Please be as specific as possible. A good portrait must have expression, (this does not specifically mean bright smile) and impact. both of these concepts have a wide range of interpretation and examples can even be contradictory, IE: A lot of really great portraits can best be described as having no expression, a perfectly relaxed face as seen in most old masters paintings. Impact is also slippery. Impact is the image you remember when you flip through a whole stack of competition entries and you just know this is the one so why bother going through the motions of scoring each one. Impact is when the composition and all the rest of the image design makes the eye find and lock on to the subject at first glance. Impact is the sum total of all those damn rules and impact is dashing that rule. What makes a good portrait is creating an image that captures the essence of a person in a technically proficient way without letting all that stuff get in the way. What makes a good portrait is an image that doesn't make the subject look fat. (note, as in the other two concepts talked about, this one is equally confusing as the thinner the subject the more they will say the image makes them look fat) or at least that's what my clients make me think. You can talk about the concept of photographer as sculpture with light in the sense that old Hollywood photogs carved the faces of their subjects on silver colloid with huge spot lights, or the photographer as a recording engineer, (the recording of music is supposed to be transparent, the listener isn't supposed to be aware of the technical production though quite often it is a significant creative partner) this drivel is echoed to the z-prophoto mailing list at yahoogroups.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
What constitutes a good portrait?
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 23:58:24 +0000 (UTC), "Martin Francis"
m wrote: Okay, first of a series of questions relating to my dissertation. I am polling photographic newsgroups in search of varying opinions, and anything said may be quoted. Q1: What constitutes a good portrait? Excluding basic technical considerations, i.e. longer focal lengths, wider apertures etc., what particular elements do you look for in taking and viewing people photographs? Do you have particular reasons for this opinion, or is it based purely on aesthetics? Please be as specific as possible. Once you move beyond discussion of technical requirements all Art becomes subjective. I've seen a lot of weird things pronounced as the "IT" that makes great art. Once you move the criteria into the subjective realm, empirical evidence is removed from the discussion, and what remains is opinion. Will opinion is valid, it is not necessarily "fact" or "truth." One word of advice as you continue, remember that just because some famous guy is quoted continually in art history discourse, it does not change the fact that his statement is opinion. Good luck with your quest. -- JC |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
What constitutes a good portrait?
What makes a good portrait is creating an image that captures the essence of
a person in a technically proficient way without letting all that stuff get in the way. There's the words I was looking for. :-) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
What constitutes a good portrait?
In article ,
J C wrote: One word of advice as you continue, remember that just because some famous guy is quoted continually in art history discourse, it does not change the fact that his statement is opinion. Then again those that found and continue to support a given media by thier creative efforts within it tend to define art, even if in a limited span of history. Sometimes their work transends the time frame they have pulled from and the work is continued to be appreciated long after them. Spending some time looking at portraiture in galleries should help someone with limited first hand experience to see body positioning and classic posing techinques,.....lighting etc. -- website: http://members.bellatlantic.net/~gblank |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
What constitutes a good portrait?
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 00:12:02 GMT, "Gregory W. Blank"
wrote: In article , J C wrote: One word of advice as you continue, remember that just because some famous guy is quoted continually in art history discourse, it does not change the fact that his statement is opinion. Then again those that found and continue to support a given media by thier creative efforts within it tend to define art, even if in a limited span of history. Sometimes their work transends the time frame they have pulled from and the work is continued to be appreciated long after them. Spending some time looking at portraiture in galleries should help someone with limited first hand experience to see body positioning and classic posing techinques,.....lighting etc. True studing the images yourself is the way to proceed. My point is that quotes from artists should never be considered as "truths" or "facts." ... because artists SAY some wacky things. -- JC |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
What constitutes a good portrait?
Martin Francis, m à
écrit : Q1: What constitutes a good portrait? The feeling. When an emotion born http://www.monochromatique.com/portrait/ -- + WEb ~ hTML ~ PhOTo + http://www.monochromatique.com Association de Photographes - http://ecpa.eu.org http://fr.groups.yahoo.com/group/canoneos_fr |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Extended warranties - good or bad idea? | ZeeExSixAre | Digital Photography | 30 | July 18th 04 09:12 PM |
Particularly good or bad films for scanning | Andrew Koenig | 35mm Photo Equipment | 10 | June 24th 04 07:43 PM |
From a good source: Nikon plans already to drop compact film cameras | ThomasH | 35mm Photo Equipment | 2 | June 19th 04 06:35 AM |
Best P&S under $300? | Egrfx63 | 35mm Photo Equipment | 16 | June 18th 04 10:18 PM |
looking for a good MF option | Don Wallace | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 3 | April 9th 04 07:48 PM |