If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 19:05:17 -0500, Ed Ruf
wrote: On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 00:43:26 +0100, in rec.photo.digital.zlr Jan Böhme wrote: Time has come to upgrade my old Nikon Coolpix 995. It isn't so much the 3 MP as the shutter lag that I'm fed up with. I originally thought of geting a DSLR, but I have decided that I can wait for a couple of new models still of those, and by a zlr while I wait. If shutter lag is your main gripe, you are aware you're not going to get much better with the 8800, right? Well, it isn't only that, come to think about it. I'm also sick and tired of the faded washed-out colours and the constant blatant underexposure at less light than full sunlight that the auto settings provide. Sure, I can manually set just about everything. But a point-and-shoot camera where any pictures in automatic modes have to be given at least a brightness +30; contrast +12 adjustment in Photoshop starts to wear on you after three years. And with that amount of purple fringing, I feel that I at least deserve a much longer zoom than it has as a compensation :-) And the teleconverter is bulky and very difficcult to focus just right. As for the shutter lag, I know that Phil Askey measured a shutter release lag of 0,1 seconds when he reviewed it at dpreview.com, but I'm at a total loss of understanding how he could arrive at thisfigure. My average shutter release lag with the c995, when seemingly fully autofocussed, is between 0,2 and 0,5 seconds - always in the upper part of the interval if I'm using the built-in flash - _way_ too slow to capture a fleeting smile. If the c8800 is similar to this in real life, then of course I won't get what I'm looking for. I sort of surmised that because everybody talks so much about the decreased shutter lags in modern point-and-shoot cameras, this must mean that the figures quoted now are real figures. But if they aren't, or if you only acheive them if you shoot in arcane ways and modes that I never do, then of course I'm done for. Jan Böhme Korrekta personuppgifter är att betrakta som journalistik. Felaktigheter utgör naturligtvis skönlitteratur. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Third-party converters for Coolpix 8800?
Time has come to upgrade my old Nikon Coolpix 995. It isn't so much
the 3 MP as the shutter lag that I'm fed up with. I originally thought of geting a DSLR, but I have decided that I can wait for a couple of new models still of those, and by a zlr while I wait. I'm hesitating between the Panasonic FZ20 and Nikon Coolpix 8800. I do a bit of bird-shooting, and would love to do more on-the-fly, so a long tele zoom and IS is a must. On the other hand I like to shoot people without them being aware of my shooting them, for more natural expressions, particularly in boys from six to sixteen or so. This could of course be done with the tele zoom, but at closer quarters, an LCD display on twistable hinge - or the swivel construction of my old c995 - helps _a lot_. I'm actually leaning towards the 8800 primarily for this reason, although it is almost $500 more expensive - here in Sweden anyway - and has a shorter tele zoom which is slower at the tele end and dosen't seem to be better optically, either. (The other advantages with the c8800 are nice, but not a priority.) If this is silly, then somebody please tell me off - and explain why it is silly. However, a 35 mm equivalent of 380 mm - or even the 438 mm of the FZ20 - isn't all that much for shooting birds, so a teleconverter would be handy. (Indeed, I have Nikon's 3x teleconverter fr my c995, so I know that there are lots of things you can't shoot even with 456 mm for focal range reasons alone) and 38 mm is not wide angle, really, but just on the wide side of normal, so a wide angle converter would come in handy too, come to think about it. Now, both the c8800 and the FZ20 have dedicated teleconverters, but they are quite expensive. I saw in another thread that one could use the considerably cheaper Olympus TLC-17 for FZ20. Are there any cheaper teleconverters around that would work - and give a decent result - on a Coolpix 8800? Jan Böhme Korrekta personuppgifter är att betrakta som journalistik. Felaktigheter utgör naturligtvis skönlitteratur. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Jan Böhme wrote:
Time has come to upgrade my old Nikon Coolpix 995. It isn't so much the 3 MP as the shutter lag that I'm fed up with. I originally thought of geting a DSLR, but I have decided that I can wait for a couple of new models still of those, and by a zlr while I wait. [] I have seen good reports of the 8800 - although the shutter lag does not seem as low as the 8400. We have both the 5700 and FZ20, and the FZ20 is a delight to use and produces excellent results. The lower cost and wider aperture lens were the reasons for choosing the FZ20 (it is primarily for a one-off holiday and could be discarded afterwards). How good is the manual focussing on the 8800? On the FZ20 it's great and easy - the central part of the viewfinder gets magnified to make any adjustments obvious. By the way, your 995 shouldn't be producing under-exposed or washed-out images - sounds like you have the settings wrong. My own policy is /not/ to use converters - they are bulky and inconvenient - but I can see that you might need them. The slightly greater zoom of the FZ20 means that it would get almost as many pixels across the actual subject as the 8800, if both were at maximum zoom (5 * (432/350)^2). I know what you mean about the swivel. I used to use a 990 (like your 995) and found the arrangement very convenient. The swivel LCD on the 5700 is almost as good, though. However, I was going to suggest you consider two cameras - keep your 995 for candids (or upgrade to something wider-angled - the Nikon 8400 has a 24mm FOV which may produce more "involved" shots...), and get the cheaper FZ20 purely for telephoto. They are both light enough that carrying both would probably still be less bother than a DSLR and its peripherals! Cheers, David |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Anti Nikon 8800 Faq | Bobsprit | Digital Photography | 66 | April 4th 05 09:41 AM |
Looking for advice/opinion replacing Nikon 5700 with Nikon 8800, Please! | All Things Mopar | Digital Photography | 17 | February 12th 05 05:32 PM |
D70 vs Nikon 8800 | Bobsprit | Digital Photography | 46 | January 9th 05 06:15 PM |
User review of the Nikon 8800 | Bobsprit | Digital Photography | 8 | November 26th 04 05:32 PM |
PARTY PARTY PARTY PARTY PARTY | Randy Birch | Film & Labs | 1 | December 31st 03 09:52 PM |