If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Skylight filters and B&W
First off, I shoot florals and landscapes 95% of the time on color reversal film
and I usually keep 1A/1B filters semi-permanently attached to my lenses (generally only coming off to attach a CPL). Lately I've been shooting some monochrome (mainly Neopan 400 and 1600) outdoor shots, mainly street scenes, and I've dedicated a body to this but share lenses. Am I shooting myself in the foot at all leaving the skylight filters on while mounted to the b&w body? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Skylight filters and B&W
"David Van Cleef" wrote in message ... First off, I shoot florals and landscapes 95% of the time on color reversal film and I usually keep 1A/1B filters semi-permanently attached to my lenses (generally only coming off to attach a CPL). Lately I've been shooting some monochrome (mainly Neopan 400 and 1600) outdoor shots, mainly street scenes, and I've dedicated a body to this but share lenses. Am I shooting myself in the foot at all leaving the skylight filters on while mounted to the b&w body? Most modern, multicoated lenses already absorb most or all UV rays, so you probably don't need a UV filter for the purpose of eliminating UV. I use them on all my lenses for protection from dirt, smudging, pollutants in the air and some degree of physical protection against damage to the front element. Your decision on whether to employ filters for protection may be different from mine. I use filters for several reasons: 1: I'm one of those guys that can't seem to keep from smudging my front elements. 2: I'm somewhat of a cleanliness nut when it comes to front elements. I'd rather replace an occasional filter rather than wear the coatings off the front elements from too-frequent cleanings. I have lenses that have not been cleaned in 30 years, with sparkling, pristine front elements. 3: I use legacy gear, and I cannot easily replace lenses by acquiring replacements of such good quality on the used market, so for me an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. 4: Well-made filters have a negligible effect on image degradation. Shooting hand-held or failure to mount appropriate lens shades will have a much more pronounced effect in the recorded image than with the addition of a good filter. 5: Even though my lenses are all multi-coated, I presume that the addition of the UV can serve only to help eliminate any UV rays that might not be fully absorbed by the lens elements. What have I to lose? Photographers that don't intend to keep using their equipment for long time frames probably don't view lens protection as a high-priority matter. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: 55 mm Skylight & circular polarizer filters | Mike Schnierle | General Equipment For Sale | 0 | March 2nd 06 03:12 PM |
FS: 55 mm Skylight & circular polarizer filters | Mike Schnierle | 35mm Equipment for Sale | 0 | March 2nd 06 03:12 PM |
UV or skylight filters for digital | Graham Archer | Digital Photography | 71 | October 28th 04 04:50 PM |
1a or 2a skylight filters and digital cameras | Fred B. | Digital Photography | 17 | August 20th 04 04:09 PM |
WTB: 95mm filters (skylight & 85) | Yemi | 35mm Equipment for Sale | 0 | July 10th 03 03:48 AM |