If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Print degredation
I have some paper B&W prints (20 x 24) made some 30 years ago that are
showing signs of my sloppy processing in that parts of the image are now looking 'sepia like'. The change is not so bad that I feel in need of reprinting but I really do need to stop further degredation. Is simply refixing and a good wash sufficient to maintain status-quo or are more extreme measures needed. Thanks; David |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Print degredation
Is the sepia in the high lights or in the shadows?
"David Vincent-Jones" wrote in message news:WdTpg.787$iW2.431@trnddc03... I have some paper B&W prints (20 x 24) made some 30 years ago that are showing signs of my sloppy processing in that parts of the image are now looking 'sepia like'. The change is not so bad that I feel in need of reprinting but I really do need to stop further degredation. Is simply refixing and a good wash sufficient to maintain status-quo or are more extreme measures needed. Thanks; David |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Print degredation
Lew, thanks for the fast response;
The highlights still, relatively, appear to be OK .. with some reasonable white detail for that reason the general appearance is not so bad. The blacks, of course, don't show the problem to any great extent. This is a paper not RC print. David "Lew" wrote in message t... Is the sepia in the high lights or in the shadows? "David Vincent-Jones" wrote in message news:WdTpg.787$iW2.431@trnddc03... I have some paper B&W prints (20 x 24) made some 30 years ago that are showing signs of my sloppy processing in that parts of the image are now looking 'sepia like'. The change is not so bad that I feel in need of reprinting but I really do need to stop further degredation. Is simply refixing and a good wash sufficient to maintain status-quo or are more extreme measures needed. Thanks; David |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Print degredation
REavid Vincent-Jones wrote:
are now looking 'sepia like'. Is simply refixing and a good wash sufficient to maintain ... For starters I'd take it as a straight forward matter. The sepia is silver sulfide. Thiosulfate will dissolve silver sulfide. So, pre-soak in water then soak in a weak plain hypo, sodium thiosulfate bath. An ounce of the anhydrous or half again as much of the penta in a quart or liter of water may do. Agitate every few minute and allow plenty of time. If nothing is happening I'd pull after an hour. BUT the print may clear in seconds. I don't know, never tried it. Should be safe. Dan |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Print degredation
Thanks ; I will give it a try ...
David wrote in message oups.com... REavid Vincent-Jones wrote: are now looking 'sepia like'. Is simply refixing and a good wash sufficient to maintain ... For starters I'd take it as a straight forward matter. The sepia is silver sulfide. Thiosulfate will dissolve silver sulfide. So, pre-soak in water then soak in a weak plain hypo, sodium thiosulfate bath. An ounce of the anhydrous or half again as much of the penta in a quart or liter of water may do. Agitate every few minute and allow plenty of time. If nothing is happening I'd pull after an hour. BUT the print may clear in seconds. I don't know, never tried it. Should be safe. Dan |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Print degredation
"David Vincent-Jones" wrote in message news:WdTpg.787$iW2.431@trnddc03... I have some paper B&W prints (20 x 24) made some 30 years ago that are showing signs of my sloppy processing in that parts of the image are now looking 'sepia like'. The change is not so bad that I feel in need of reprinting but I really do need to stop further degredation. Is simply refixing and a good wash sufficient to maintain status-quo or are more extreme measures needed. Thanks; David A late answer. Its hard to know exactly what caused this. Yellow or brown stains are often from sulfiding of the silver caused by decomposition of thiosulfate left in the emulsion although it can also be caused by residual silver halide. When its halide it can appear in the clear areas giving the print an overall yellow or brownish color, perhaps a bit blotchy. Atmospheric polutants will affect the image silver causing staining of the image but not the clear areas. Sulfides from mounting or storage material can also cause yellow staining, often concentrated near the edges of the print. Yellow stains can also be caused by the developer but these usually show up during processing. The other cause of degradation is oxidation, usually from gasses in the atmosphere, but oxidants can also come from mounting materials. Silver oxide can be yellow or brown but it is often black or metallic looking. The oxides are very fine and can migrate through the gelatin causing "mirroring" at the surface and a slight border around dark areas. Once either process has occured there is not very that can be done about it. Sulfide stains can sometimes be removed by the use of a Permanganate bleach. For instance: Kodak S-6 Stain Remover Stock Solution A Potassium Permanganate 5.0 grams Water to make 1.0 liter Make sure all the Permanganate particles are fully dissolved Stock Solution B Cold Water 500.0 ml Sodium Chloride 75.0 grams Sulfuric Acid, concentrated 16.0 ml Water to make 1.0 liter Sulfuric acid produces great heat when dissolving. Add the acid to the water slowly with constant stirring. Mix this solution in a heat proof container. To use mix equal amounts of A and B. Mix just before use, the mixed solution does not last. Bleach the negative or print in this solution until the image is fullty bleached, about 3 or 4 minutes should be sufficient. Then clear in a 1% solution of Sodium Bisulfite or metabisulfite. Then rinse well and expose to strong light, preferably sunlight, and redevelop in a low sulfite developer like Dektol or D-72 1:2. Then wash thoroughly. There are other treatments but they have proved to result in non-permanent images. You can try refixing but after a couple of weeks of the original fixing the residual silver halides change into a form wich can no longer be made completely soluble by the fixer. I think it would be easier to reprint. If you do (or after this treatment) tone the print using Kodak Brown Toner. The toner will give substantial protection to the image for both sulfiding and oxidation. This should be routine for any display print (you can also use Gold toner if you want a cold tone print). -- --- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Print degredation
"David Vincent-Jones" wrote in message news:WdTpg.787$iW2.431@trnddc03... I have some paper B&W prints (20 x 24) made some 30 years ago that are showing signs of my sloppy processing in that parts of the image are now looking 'sepia like'. The change is not so bad that I feel in need of reprinting but I really do need to stop further degredation. Is simply refixing and a good wash sufficient to maintain status-quo or are more extreme measures needed. Thanks; David I left out a part. If there is "mirroring" from oxidation you may be able to remove it with a mild silver bleach. The mirroring is from image silver which has been converted to Silver Oxide by some polutant, migrated to the surface, and been reduced back to metallic silver by other polutants. A good bleach for removing this (also works for dichroic fog) is a Rapid fixer, like Kodak Rapid Fixer with Hardener, at film strength, with the addition of 15 grams/liter of Citric Acid. This solution works slowly but will also bleach some of the image silver if not watched carefully. Once bleached the print should be treated in a sulfite wash aid and washed. The treatment will remove the mirroring but not restore the image. Keep in mind that some of the silver making up the image has been lost, there is no way to replace it. This treatment can probably be used in conjuction with the permanganate bleach I described in my first post. This should be done first and the bleach and redevelopment afterward. -- --- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Print degredation
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 00:04:01 GMT, "Richard Knoppow"
wrote: A late answer. Its hard to know exactly what caused this. Yellow or brown stains are often from sulfiding of the silver caused by decomposition of thiosulfate left in the emulsion although it can also be caused by residual silver halide. How about washing in water that is high in sulfur ? Much of my family lives in the Owensboro, KY area and when we go for a visit I have to take bottled water as the sulfur content is high enough to cause my nose to burn. == John S. Douglas Photographer & Webmaster Legacy-photo.com - Xs750.net |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Print degredation
Richard;
Thanks for the very detailed feedback .. both replies.. they gave me some most useful information. As a result of selling a house in which I had been living for more than 30 years I came across a ton of images that had been buried and forgotten .. some processed for commercial purposes in just too much of a hurry .. but a few that I now feel are well worth salvaging and giving greater prominence in my current (digital photographic) life. I have, at any rate, now at least refixed and thoroughly washed the offending images to prevent further degradation but honestly I think your ultimate solution of reprinting is probably the best answer to the problem. Thanks again; David "Richard Knoppow" wrote in message k.net... "David Vincent-Jones" wrote in message news:WdTpg.787$iW2.431@trnddc03... I have some paper B&W prints (20 x 24) made some 30 years ago that are showing signs of my sloppy processing in that parts of the image are now looking 'sepia like'. The change is not so bad that I feel in need of reprinting but I really do need to stop further degredation. Is simply refixing and a good wash sufficient to maintain status-quo or are more extreme measures needed. Thanks; David I left out a part. If there is "mirroring" from oxidation you may be able to remove it with a mild silver bleach. The mirroring is from image silver which has been converted to Silver Oxide by some polutant, migrated to the surface, and been reduced back to metallic silver by other polutants. A good bleach for removing this (also works for dichroic fog) is a Rapid fixer, like Kodak Rapid Fixer with Hardener, at film strength, with the addition of 15 grams/liter of Citric Acid. This solution works slowly but will also bleach some of the image silver if not watched carefully. Once bleached the print should be treated in a sulfite wash aid and washed. The treatment will remove the mirroring but not restore the image. Keep in mind that some of the silver making up the image has been lost, there is no way to replace it. This treatment can probably be used in conjuction with the permanganate bleach I described in my first post. This should be done first and the bleach and redevelopment afterward. -- --- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Print degredation
"John" wrote in message ... On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 00:04:01 GMT, "Richard Knoppow" wrote: A late answer. Its hard to know exactly what caused this. Yellow or brown stains are often from sulfiding of the silver caused by decomposition of thiosulfate left in the emulsion although it can also be caused by residual silver halide. How about washing in water that is high in sulfur ? Much of my family lives in the Owensboro, KY area and when we go for a visit I have to take bottled water as the sulfur content is high enough to cause my nose to burn. == John S. Douglas Photographer & Webmaster Legacy-photo.com - Xs750.net Beyond my knowledge but it certainly sounds possible. Other sulfur compounds will certainly cause image degradation problems. -- --- Richard Knoppow Los Angeles, CA, USA |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New inkjet print mounting technique | llamadave | Digital Photography | 6 | March 20th 06 04:45 AM |
Two ways of looking at how large to print | Scott W | Digital Photography | 12 | April 10th 05 06:36 PM |
Very Long - How to Tweak the PrintFix Scanner - (Followup to another thread) | BobS | Digital Photography | 7 | January 27th 05 09:32 PM |
Focal plane vs. leaf shutters in MF SLRs | KM | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 724 | December 7th 04 09:58 AM |
roll-film back: DOF question | RSD99 | Large Format Photography Equipment | 41 | July 30th 04 03:12 AM |