If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Wildlife photogs need to go beyond camera lenses
I've seen quite a few shots of animals recently where the photogs
coudn't get too close, for various reasons. What struck me was that although the shots were sharp, they were obviously heavily cropped because noise was evident in them. Noise in pro DSLRs is "attractive" in a film-like way, but the cropping still reduces the overall quality of the image. If a photog is using a 600mm lens with a converter to get 1200mm, and it's still not enough to avoid heavy cropping, maybe it's time to get away from long refractive telephotos and into reflex systems that would allow much greater focal lengths while maintaining a reasonable focal ratio? The only drawback of course would be the inability to stop-down and the attendent short depth of field. But, there are lens systems out there that can provide focal lengths in the 2500mm range with f6.3 focal ratios. No autofocus though. -Rich |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
In message ,
Rich wrote: I've seen quite a few shots of animals recently where the photogs coudn't get too close, for various reasons. What struck me was that although the shots were sharp, they were obviously heavily cropped because noise was evident in them. Noise in pro DSLRs is "attractive" in a film-like way, but the cropping still reduces the overall quality of the image. If a photog is using a 600mm lens with a converter to get 1200mm, and it's still not enough to avoid heavy cropping, maybe it's time to get away from long refractive telephotos and into reflex systems that would allow much greater focal lengths while maintaining a reasonable focal ratio? The only drawback of course would be the inability to stop-down and the attendent short depth of field. But, there are lens systems out there that can provide focal lengths in the 2500mm range with f6.3 focal ratios. No autofocus though. Might work for a bird on a wire, or in the sky, but the bokeh would be a mess for an animal in the brush or in a tree. -- John P Sheehy |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Ed Ruf wrote:
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 22:12:52 -0400, in rec.photo.digital.slr-systems Rich The only drawback of course would be the inability to stop-down and the attendent short depth of field. But, there are lens systems out there that can provide focal lengths in the 2500mm range with f6.3 focal ratios. No autofocus though. And the brokeh looks like what? Ugly beyond words? I own one mirror lens and it's such a PITA to use and produces such UGLY bokeh, the only thing it can even be used for is maybe a bird or something in water or in the sky. -- Stacey |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Stacey" wrote in message ... Ed Ruf wrote: On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 22:12:52 -0400, in rec.photo.digital.slr-systems Rich The only drawback of course would be the inability to stop-down and the attendent short depth of field. But, there are lens systems out there that can provide focal lengths in the 2500mm range with f6.3 focal ratios. No autofocus though. And the brokeh looks like what? Ugly beyond words? I own one mirror lens and it's such a PITA to use and produces such UGLY bokeh, the only thing it can even be used for is maybe a bird or something in water or in the sky. Some folks like it, some folks don't. http://mendosus.com/jpg/gumnuts.jpg Some folks don't care either way. This example is a particularly *aggressive* one. -- Jeff R. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Rich wrote: If a photog is using a 600mm lens with a converter to get 1200mm, and it's still not enough to avoid heavy cropping, maybe it's time to get away from long refractive telephotos and into reflex systems that would allow much greater focal lengths while maintaining a reasonable focal ratio? Or to resort to digiscoping. More of a hassle, but much better images when you get it right. http://www.shortcourses.com/how/digi...igiscoping.htm Jan B=F6hme |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 23:27:54 -0400, Ed Ruf
wrote: On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 22:12:52 -0400, in rec.photo.digital.slr-systems Rich wrote: I've seen quite a few shots of animals recently where the photogs coudn't get too close, for various reasons. What struck me was that although the shots were sharp, they were obviously heavily cropped because noise was evident in them. Noise in pro DSLRs is "attractive" in a film-like way, but the cropping still reduces the overall quality of the image. If a photog is using a 600mm lens with a converter to get 1200mm, and it's still not enough to avoid heavy cropping, maybe it's time to get away from long refractive telephotos and into reflex systems that would allow much greater focal lengths while maintaining a reasonable focal ratio? The only drawback of course would be the inability to stop-down and the attendent short depth of field. But, there are lens systems out there that can provide focal lengths in the 2500mm range with f6.3 focal ratios. No autofocus though. And the brokeh looks like what? Maybe we could learn to like the christmas tree-like defocussed circle of light? If the idea is to capture the animal (or whatever) in the best detail possible, and not to make artistic pictures, it wouldn't matter about the background. -Rich |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 18:09:19 +1000, "Jeff R"
wrote: "Stacey" wrote in message ... Ed Ruf wrote: On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 22:12:52 -0400, in rec.photo.digital.slr-systems Rich The only drawback of course would be the inability to stop-down and the attendent short depth of field. But, there are lens systems out there that can provide focal lengths in the 2500mm range with f6.3 focal ratios. No autofocus though. And the brokeh looks like what? Ugly beyond words? I own one mirror lens and it's such a PITA to use and produces such UGLY bokeh, the only thing it can even be used for is maybe a bird or something in water or in the sky. Some folks like it, some folks don't. http://mendosus.com/jpg/gumnuts.jpg Some folks don't care either way. This example is a particularly *aggressive* one. That, I admit is pretty horrible. It's a good example of why refractive elements still dominate the field. But some pictures (say a lion on the Savannah) won't produce that kind of effect since specular highlights on the high grass likely won't happen, or will be so subdued that they won't produce that kind of effect. -Rich |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On 11 Sep 2005 10:22:43 -0700, "Jan Böhme" wrote:
Rich wrote: If a photog is using a 600mm lens with a converter to get 1200mm, and it's still not enough to avoid heavy cropping, maybe it's time to get away from long refractive telephotos and into reflex systems that would allow much greater focal lengths while maintaining a reasonable focal ratio? Or to resort to digiscoping. More of a hassle, but much better images when you get it right. http://www.shortcourses.com/how/digi...igiscoping.htm Jan Böhme Main problem is speed. I've seen the calculations and when using (for example) and 80mm scope to produce a 2000mm focal length, you're f-ratio becomes 25. Better to invest in a good quality telescope of sufficient aperture and a high quality projection lens (eyepiece) to capture the image. P&S shooters have no choice in this, they have to use an eyepiece to get an image owing to the fact their camera lenses are fixed. Here's a shot I took at 4000mm using a telescope with a 125mm wide front aperture. F-ratio was (4000/125) 32. http://www.pbase.com/andersonrm/image/46946057 Because the lens was an f-8 achromat, and not an apochromat, there is minor residual chromatic aberration, which could be removed in software. The scope itself has a focal length of 1000mm and is about 4 feet long. But I cobbled it together as a hobby project for around $300.00, including it's tripod so it's an inexpensive way of getting focal length. -Rich |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Rich wrote:
On 11 Sep 2005 10:22:43 -0700, "Jan B=F6hme" wrote: digiscoping. Main problem is speed. I've seen the calculations and when using (for example) and 80mm scope to produce a 2000mm focal length, you're f-ratio becomes 25. Not something for dawn or dusk, agreed. But I have a friend who does digiscoping with a Swarovski ATS-80 HD vith a 20x eyepiece, a digiscoping adapter, and a Nikon CP 995. (He used to borrow my Coolpix, that's how I got into it.) He can get decent pics at full zoom, which would have a focal equivalent of just over 3000 mm, and an f-ratio of just under 40, according to your calculations, also when the bird isn't in bright sunlight. P&S shooters have no choice in this, they have to use an eyepiece to get an image owing to the fact their camera lenses are fixed. Here's a shot I took at 4000mm using a telescope with a 125mm wide front aperture. F-ratio was (4000/125) 32. I agree that the extra three stops of ISO sensitivity you get in a DSLR must be very useful when shooting through a telescope, and there are cheap adapters that allow a DSLR to me coupled to a telescope. OTOH, then you can't use the camera lens of the digicam for extra zoom. Given the same scope, you get a lot more of both light and sensitivity, but considerably less equivalent focal length. In theory, it should be possible to hook up a DSLR, lens and all, behind a telescope, just as the P&S shooters do with their digicams. Then, one would take advantage of the three extra stops of sensitivity, without having to compromise on equivalent focal length. But I have never seen it done. And nomal lens diameters of SLR lenses aren't exactly ideal for digiscoping purposes. Jan B=F6hme |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Conversion lenses and compact digital camera | madz | Digital Photography | 1 | February 7th 05 01:56 PM |
For Sale: PRICES HAVE BEEN REDUCED! 6 Nikon lenses + 8x10 papers + some accessories. | Henry Peña | 35mm Equipment for Sale | 0 | April 12th 04 10:47 PM |
For Sale: 7 Nikon lenses + 8x10 papers + some accessories. | Henry Peña | 35mm Equipment for Sale | 2 | April 9th 04 04:17 PM |
FA: less than a day, under £30, Ricoh KR-10 35mm Camera, lenses, flash extras | jon | 35mm Equipment for Sale | 0 | February 25th 04 08:53 PM |
FS: 8 Nikon lenses including 80-200 Nikkor 2.8 zoom and accessories | Henry Peña | General Equipment For Sale | 0 | November 11th 03 06:20 PM |