If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Difference in 100 vs. 200 ISO.
Alan Browne wrote:
Søren Reinke wrote: Most film chip's are ISO 100 rated from the factory everything else is pure amplification. not quite. Each fab method results in a sensitivity that lies somewhere in the region of 50 - 200, most sensors lie somewhere in the 100 - 200 range. It doesn't "land" on a nice round number. I should add that it is not "pure amplification" as that does not exist in the real world. There is analog amplification at the A/D level, and then for the higher ISO's (800 or 1600 and up) digital amplification. Further, there is an ISO variance between various camera models of down/upwards of 2/3 of a stop. Cheers, Alan -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Difference in 100 vs. 200 ISO.
Greg "_" wrote:
I would look at the noise level, does it equate to an equal value for a film exposure? If not then perhaps film is the best choice for a given output size. I find 200 asa rather smooth but problematic in terms of opening shadow areas Why so? (opening shaddow areas) (or are you referring to slide film?) -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI] gallery & rulz: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- e-meil: Remove FreeLunch. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Difference in 100 vs. 200 ISO.
In article ,
Alan Browne wrote: Greg "_" wrote: I would look at the noise level, does it equate to an equal value for a film exposure? If not then perhaps film is the best choice for a given output size. I find 200 asa rather smooth but problematic in terms of opening shadow areas Why so? (opening shaddow areas) (or are you referring to slide film?) Well does it not stand to reason the noise level at a given ISO should be on par? I know I want equivalent exposures to match each other in terms of the noise (At the very least- and if they don't I would use the best tool for the job). -- "As democracy is perfected, the office represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. We move toward a lofty ideal. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron." - H. L. Mencken, in the Baltimore Sun, July 26, 1920. Reality-Is finding that perfect picture and never looking back. www.gregblankphoto.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is there a difference? | Cheesehead | Large Format Photography Equipment | 0 | January 10th 06 02:30 AM |
Difference between 5D and 7D? | shipping | Digital SLR Cameras | 4 | December 25th 05 01:20 PM |
What's The Difference? |
secheese | Digital Photography | 20 | November 7th 04 02:27 AM |
What is the difference between PB-E2 and PB-E1 for an EOS 3 | Swirl The World | 35mm Photo Equipment | 0 | November 5th 04 07:59 AM |
f1.8 or f2.0, much difference ? | DHB | Digital Photography | 14 | September 5th 04 09:15 AM |