If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Opinions on Spotmeters
Hi, I'm looking for a used spotmeter. I'd like some opinions on different
brands. I'm considering Pentax: digital and analog, Minolta spotmeterF, Gossen, Sekonic and Soligor. The Soligors seem to be the least expensive. There's usually a reason. Are the Soligors junk? I don't want to start a war here. I'd just like some honest opinions to help me make an informed decision. As always, Thanks for your help. mj |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Opinions on Spotmeters
In article k.net, "Mike
Jenkins" wrote: Hi, I'm looking for a used spotmeter. [...] Just my two-bits worth: used is a bad idea. It's too bad that used light-meters don't have the same depreciation a lot of other consumer electronic instruments do so that you could buy them a dime-to-the-dollar, but new and uninformed buyers keep the prices up. A new light meter should have a warantee. If a new light meter is going to fail, it's usually within the first several hours of use and then you can replace it via warantee. Otherwise, you may be getting a bad one, or a good one that's well on it's way to MTBF. IMHO it's not worth the disappointments. (The bad thing about casual use of new equipment is that 'house of use' thing; a lot of people don't reach that goal until the warantee is up. _Use_ the light meter. A lot.) However, if you accept the risk of a flawed meter, or lower your expectations, then you may luck out. Your chances are better than the lottery, but not different. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Opinions on Spotmeters
I used Minolta Spotmeter F for over 12 years. So far so good.
"jjs" ¦b¶l¥ó ¤¤¼¶¼g... In article k.net, "Mike Jenkins" wrote: Hi, I'm looking for a used spotmeter. [...] Just my two-bits worth: used is a bad idea. It's too bad that used light-meters don't have the same depreciation a lot of other consumer electronic instruments do so that you could buy them a dime-to-the-dollar, but new and uninformed buyers keep the prices up. A new light meter should have a warantee. If a new light meter is going to fail, it's usually within the first several hours of use and then you can replace it via warantee. Otherwise, you may be getting a bad one, or a good one that's well on it's way to MTBF. IMHO it's not worth the disappointments. (The bad thing about casual use of new equipment is that 'house of use' thing; a lot of people don't reach that goal until the warantee is up. _Use_ the light meter. A lot.) However, if you accept the risk of a flawed meter, or lower your expectations, then you may luck out. Your chances are better than the lottery, but not different. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Opinions on Spotmeters
In article , "Camera"
wrote: I used Minolta Spotmeter F for over 12 years. So far so good. Anyone who understands the metrics of failure knows that your case is 1) subjectve (requires tests to discern accuracy) 2) lacks hours of use metrics and 3) none-the-less is just one sample. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Opinions on Spotmeters
"Mike Jenkins" wrote in message
hlink.net... Hi, I'm looking for a used spotmeter. I'd like some opinions on different brands. I'm considering Pentax: digital and analog, Minolta spotmeterF, Gossen, Sekonic and Soligor. The Soligors seem to be the least expensive. There's usually a reason. Are the Soligors junk? I don't want to start a war here. I'd just like some honest opinions to help me make an informed decision. As always, Thanks for your help. mj I have a Soligor spot meter that I have owned for 22 years. Still works perfectly (with a new battery). I think they cost a little less when new than the Pentax and they have not been made them for quite a while, which probably accounts for their lower value today (since the average age is bound to be higher than a used meter still in production). Richard Ritter (formally of Zone VI Studios) still repairs them. Zone VI Studios (Fred Picker) sold slightly modified versions of both the Pentax and Soligor spot meters, so the Soligors are not junk. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Opinions on Spotmeters
Mike Jenkins wrote:
Hi, I'm looking for a used spotmeter. I'd like some opinions on different brands. I'm considering Pentax: digital and analog, Minolta spotmeterF, Gossen, Sekonic and Soligor. I use a Gossen Spotmaster (may be called differently in the US). It is a very accurate, and very complete meter (many modes). But it is big (but then, which one isn't?) and it consumes batteries (9V block) by the truck load. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Opinions on Spotmeters
"Mike Jenkins" wrote in message hlink.net... Hi, I'm looking for a used spotmeter. I'd like some opinions on different brands. I'm considering Pentax: digital and analog, Minolta spotmeterF, Gossen, Sekonic and Soligor. The Soligors seem to be the least expensive. There's usually a reason. Are the Soligors junk? I don't want to start a war here. I'd just like some honest opinions to help me make an informed decision. As always, Thanks for your help. mj I have a Minolta Spotmeter F, which I am very happy with. It has been reliable and never failed or given a false reading. The Spotmeter F has about the right level of features for me. I did also have a Pentax Digital for a while. This is also very good, and has the advantage that you can attach a Zone scale to the dial readout. In the end I decided I preferred the Minolta for it's LCD readout, memory, and the highlight/shadow features, and it's handling. Not a lot in it though. I have handled a Gossen Spotmaster, and didn't really like it as it seemed too complex. The viewfinder seemed filled with displays. Also it is quite big. Having said that, I only tried it briefly, and you probably get used to it. My feeling was that it was too 'gadgetty' though. John |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Opinions on Spotmeters
"jjs" wrote in message ... In article , "Camera" wrote: I used Minolta Spotmeter F for over 12 years. So far so good. Anyone who understands the metrics of failure knows that your case is 1) subjectve (requires tests to discern accuracy) 2) lacks hours of use metrics and 3) none-the-less is just one sample. Well, here is one more. I have been using one (Minolta Spotmeter F) for about 5 years. It is used on an average of one hour per day. Although it is kept in its case and usually carried in a cloth camera bag (or rigid LF case) it has not had tender care. I love the single AA-cell power. Mine lasts about 6 mo. I check for accuracy when installing a new cell. On the negative side, the flash-meter operation seems to have a mind of its own - sometimes it requires several attempts to obtain an acceptable result. Once obtained though, the camera of choice produces good negatives/chroms. I don't think Soligor meters are junk, but in my experience, in optics, one usually pays for what one gets, and better optics cost more. But is it worth the price? Only you can judge that. Also if a used digital meter works at all, it is probably acceptable for all but the most critical work. My experience with students has been that most problems arising with the use of spot meters (any meter for that matter) is due to operator error, usually brought about by inexperience or poor technique. Both can be solved. Truly, dr bob. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Opinions on Spotmeters
Well, here is one more. I have been using one (Minolta Spotmeter F) for
about 5 years. It is used on an average of one hour per day. Although it is kept in its case and usually carried in a cloth camera bag (or rigid LF case) it has not had tender care. I love the single AA-cell power. Mine lasts about 6 mo. I check for accuracy when installing a new cell. On the negative side, the flash-meter operation seems to have a mind of its own - sometimes it requires several attempts to obtain an acceptable result. Once obtained though, the camera of choice produces good negatives/chroms. I don't think Soligor meters are junk, but in my experience, in optics, one usually pays for what one gets, and better optics cost more. But is it worth the price? Only you can judge that. Also if a used digital meter works at all, it is probably acceptable for all but the most critical work. My experience with students has been that most problems arising with the use of spot meters (any meter for that matter) is due to operator error, usually brought about by inexperience or poor technique. Both can be solved. Truly, dr bob. I am not really sure what optics has to do with spot meters. Admittedly there are some "lenses" in a spotmeter, but the quality required in a meter is not critical. 30 years ago I frequently used a Soligor telephoto lenses on my Canon 35mm body and the quality of lens was fine. Maybe not as good a Canon lens, but close enough. Certainly good enough for spot meter. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Opinions on Spotmeters
"Mike Jenkins" wrote in message
hlink.net... Hi, I'm looking for a used spotmeter. I'd like some opinions on different brands. I'm considering Pentax: digital and analog, Minolta spotmeterF, Gossen, Sekonic and Soligor. The Soligors seem to be the least expensive. There's usually a reason. Are the Soligors junk? I have both the Soligor and a Pentax analogue. They both have their high points, and their own quirks. Neither is junk. I have found from years of field shooting, that a good incident meter, and good overall sense of the light on the subject have replaced minutes of pointing a spot meter around, trying to determine n-1 n-2 etc. Believe it or not, the sunny 16 rule, plus a few modifications for overall shadows to highlights will still work 95% of the time. That is if your lenses and shutters all work properly, or if you have adjusted fo any discrepencies in them. good luck.... |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Olympus C-60 opinions please | unavailable | 35mm Photo Equipment | 0 | June 17th 04 01:04 AM |
152mm f4.5 Ektar opinions | John Hendry | Large Format Photography Equipment | 2 | April 12th 04 09:51 AM |
152mm f4.5 Ektar opinions | doug | Large Format Photography Equipment | 5 | April 9th 04 02:02 AM |
Opinions on Jobo LPL C 7700 Color Enlarger & Other Equipment | Andrew McCall | In The Darkroom | 1 | February 23rd 04 08:34 AM |