did anyone try this: cheap point-n-shoot on the back of a large format beast?

chibitul wrote in news:chibitul-
:

Did anyone try to use a large format camera to get an image (with all
the advantages of large format cameras: tilt, shift, etc) and then use
a
small digicam instead of film to snap the picture? I imagine if you
make
some sort of fixture to attach the digicam to the back of the large
format camera, and focus on the glass plate, you should be able to snap
*that* image. I never used a large format camera and I do not intend to
venture into this field unless I can do it digitally. I am not into
high
resolution stuff, I read some of Ansel Adams books and I am impressed
with what you can do with large format when you can tilt/shift the lens
and the negative as you want. Just wondering if I can "piggy-back" a
cheap point-n-shoot on the back of a large format beast?



Of course you can. Several here have given you reasons why it is
not so interesting. I will give you two more.

1. Restitution (e.g. fixing non parallel lines in architecture)
you can do better in your photo editor.

2. The small camera already has a large depth of field, so tilting
of the lens is not neccessary to get all parts in focus.


/Roland

chibitul wrote in news:chibitul-
:

Did anyone try to use a large format camera to get an image (with all
the advantages of large format cameras: tilt, shift, etc) and then use
a
small digicam instead of film to snap the picture? I imagine if you
make
some sort of fixture to attach the digicam to the back of the large
format camera, and focus on the glass plate, you should be able to snap
*that* image. I never used a large format camera and I do not intend to
venture into this field unless I can do it digitally. I am not into
high
resolution stuff, I read some of Ansel Adams books and I am impressed
with what you can do with large format when you can tilt/shift the lens
and the negative as you want. Just wondering if I can "piggy-back" a
cheap point-n-shoot on the back of a large format beast?



Of course you can. Several here have given you reasons why it is
not so interesting. I will give you two more.

1. Restitution (e.g. fixing non parallel lines in architecture)
you can do better in your photo editor.

2. The small camera already has a large depth of field, so tilting
of the lens is not neccessary to get all parts in focus.


/Roland

Roland Karlsson wrote:

1. Restitution (e.g. fixing non parallel lines in architecture)
you can do better in your photo editor.

Not without significant quality loss. Shift lenses are not useless on
smaller cameras; indeed, I wish more of them were made.

--
Jeremy |

Roland Karlsson wrote:

1. Restitution (e.g. fixing non parallel lines in architecture)
you can do better in your photo editor.

Not without significant quality loss. Shift lenses are not useless on
smaller cameras; indeed, I wish more of them were made.

--
Jeremy |

In article ,
Leonard Evens wrote:

Ultimately most physicist believe there
will be a final theory which explains everything, perhaps some variant
of string theory. When you start talking about light from distant
galaxies, I think it gets more complicated than just using geometric optics.


Maybe even stuff that hasn't happened yet :-)

Well, when things have happened can be pretty complicated because of
relativity theory. But who knows?

I like string theory, something nags at me I can't quite put into words
though.
--
To win one hundred victories in one hundred battles is not the
measure of skill. To subdue the enemy without fighting is the
measure of skill. Sun Tzu

In article ,
Leonard Evens wrote:

Ultimately most physicist believe there
will be a final theory which explains everything, perhaps some variant
of string theory. When you start talking about light from distant
galaxies, I think it gets more complicated than just using geometric optics.


Maybe even stuff that hasn't happened yet :-)

Well, when things have happened can be pretty complicated because of
relativity theory. But who knows?

I like string theory, something nags at me I can't quite put into words
though.
--
To win one hundred victories in one hundred battles is not the
measure of skill. To subdue the enemy without fighting is the
measure of skill. Sun Tzu

Jeremy Nixon wrote in news:10h2jjjjft4qh67
@corp.supernews.com:

1. Restitution (e.g. fixing non parallel lines in architecture)
you can do better in your photo editor.

Not without significant quality loss.

Not all that significant IMHO. Shifting and tilting lenses also
introduces problems. Lenses are not optimised to be used thus.

Shift lenses are not useless on
smaller cameras; indeed, I wish more of them were made.

It is a matter of opinion of course. Personally I find it a
a waste in complexity and cost to use on a small camera.
Shift and tilt lenses are bigger and has less resolution
as they must have a larger image circle and also lots of
mechanics. Not optimal in any way.

Sounds cost effective, and even quality effective, to do
it in software.

But if you want a $200 200 gram camera body with a
$1000 500 gram shift and tilt lens, thats your choice


/Roland

Jeremy Nixon wrote in news:10h2jjjjft4qh67
@corp.supernews.com:

1. Restitution (e.g. fixing non parallel lines in architecture)
you can do better in your photo editor.

Not without significant quality loss.

Not all that significant IMHO. Shifting and tilting lenses also
introduces problems. Lenses are not optimised to be used thus.

Shift lenses are not useless on
smaller cameras; indeed, I wish more of them were made.

It is a matter of opinion of course. Personally I find it a
a waste in complexity and cost to use on a small camera.
Shift and tilt lenses are bigger and has less resolution
as they must have a larger image circle and also lots of
mechanics. Not optimal in any way.

Sounds cost effective, and even quality effective, to do
it in software.

But if you want a $200 200 gram camera body with a
$1000 500 gram shift and tilt lens, thats your choice


/Roland

Roland Karlsson wrote:

Crownfield wrote in :

http://www.calumetphoto.com/ctl?PAGE...cat.CatTree&ac
.cat.CatTree.prodIndex.param=09;Digital+Imaging;03 0;Digital+Image+Capture;005;Studio+View+Cameras;67 ;Cambo


All I got was - "your session has timed out".

when I retried the link, I got that and the message

If this browser session has been idle for some time then your session
has timed out. If you were logged in and had a shopping cart you may
login again now to reopen your cart. You may also be seeing this message
if your browser is set to refuse cookies. If you opened a page via a
bookmark, you may safely disregard this message.

at calumet, use the tree, and try selecting

Digital Imaging
Digital Image Capture
Studio View Cameras and finally
Cambo


if you have a problem, google for

cambo camera s2


/Roland

Roland Karlsson wrote:

Crownfield wrote in :

http://www.calumetphoto.com/ctl?PAGE...cat.CatTree&ac
.cat.CatTree.prodIndex.param=09;Digital+Imaging;03 0;Digital+Image+Capture;005;Studio+View+Cameras;67 ;Cambo


All I got was - "your session has timed out".

when I retried the link, I got that and the message

If this browser session has been idle for some time then your session
has timed out. If you were logged in and had a shopping cart you may
login again now to reopen your cart. You may also be seeing this message
if your browser is set to refuse cookies. If you opened a page via a
bookmark, you may safely disregard this message.

at calumet, use the tree, and try selecting

Digital Imaging
Digital Image Capture
Studio View Cameras and finally
Cambo


if you have a problem, google for

cambo camera s2


/Roland