If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Color temparture and calibration w/ ColorVision SpyderPRO
I've noticed that there are quite a few people in this forum who use
(and seem to be happy with) the ColorVision Spyder. I've got the pro version, and I've got quite a few problems with it. Perhaps I don't fully understand color calibration and color temperature. I have a notebook computer with a flatpanel display. (Stop screaming, I know I shouldn't be using it for color-critial work in the first place. But in the field it's all I have and I might as well try to get the best possible performance out of it.) The color temperature of this display can NOT be preset. It seems to be set to a fixed 9300K and color representation is far too cool. (I generally prefer to work at 6500K color temperature.) Now it is my understanding that a monitor presets its color temperature (9300K, 6500K, 5500K, etc.) by varying the amounts of Red, Green and Blue to arrive at the desired balance. In other words the same thing a color calibration profile does. So why can't my Spyder and the accompanying software (the most recent OptiCal) achieve proper calibration for a 6500K target when the monitor is preset to 9300K? Surely it's not the lack of tonal range in the video card. Yet after the Spyder completes calibration my colors are still way too blue. I've tried various calibration targets in the software, but any deviation from 'native' makes it worse. What am I missing here? I'd appreciate if someone can enlighten me. Thanks! Regards, Frank --- A: People who can't be bothered to quote properly! Q: What is the most annoying thing in E-mail? ============================================ Email: Homepage: http://www.vanwensveen.nl ============================================ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Frank van Wensveen" wrote in message ...
I've noticed that there are quite a few people in this forum who use (and seem to be happy with) the ColorVision Spyder. I've got the pro version, and I've got quite a few problems with it. Perhaps I don't fully understand color calibration and color temperature. I have a notebook computer with a flatpanel display. (Stop screaming, I know I shouldn't be using it for color-critial work in the first place. But in the field it's all I have and I might as well try to get the best possible performance out of it.) The color temperature of this display can NOT be preset. It seems to be set to a fixed 9300K and color representation is far too cool. (I generally prefer to work at 6500K color temperature.) Now it is my understanding that a monitor presets its color temperature (9300K, 6500K, 5500K, etc.) by varying the amounts of Red, Green and Blue to arrive at the desired balance. In other words the same thing a color calibration profile does. So why can't my Spyder and the accompanying software (the most recent OptiCal) achieve proper calibration for a 6500K target when the monitor is preset to 9300K? Surely it's not the lack of tonal range in the video card. Yet after the Spyder completes calibration my colors are still way too blue. I've tried various calibration targets in the software, but any deviation from 'native' makes it worse. What am I missing here? I'd appreciate if someone can enlighten me. Thanks! White point is not just a combination of RGB. There's also brightness and contrast levels that make the difference between accurate white, and something other than white (e.g. gray). Color calibration devices assume the monitor has a preset for 6500K and is set properly. If your laptop is halfway decent it'll have a port for an external monitor. Attach one, set it to 6500K and see if you can get acceptable results. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 03:13:26 -0800, "Moistened Bink"
wrote: White point is not just a combination of RGB. There's also brightness and contrast levels that make the difference between accurate white, and something other than white (e.g. gray). If you vary all RGB colors you will vary brightness, and contrast is the possible amount of variation. Right? So I still don't understand why this can't be achieved in a color profile... Color calibration devices assume the monitor has a preset for 6500K and is set properly. If your laptop is halfway decent it'll have a port for an external monitor. Attach one, set it to 6500K and see if you can get acceptable results. I get acceptable results with my other monitors so I don't expect that will be a problem. It's the notebook's flatpanel that I need to calibrate, since I don't want to lug an extra monitor around for field work... Regards, Frank --- A: People who can't be bothered to quote properly! Q: What is the most annoying thing in E-mail? ============================================ Email: Homepage: http://www.vanwensveen.nl ============================================ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
You should be able to calibrate your LCD for what it is: I have a two year
old Dell that I use regularly in this fashion. You can often make significant adjustments to your screen through the video driver. However the apparent brightness of the screen may be significantly affected, which is one reason why the color temp is so high to begin with. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Frank van Wensveen" wrote in message news
On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 03:13:26 -0800, "Moistened Bink" wrote: White point is not just a combination of RGB. There's also brightness and contrast levels that make the difference between accurate white, and something other than white (e.g. gray). If you vary all RGB colors you will vary brightness, and contrast is the possible amount of variation. Right? No. The purpose of RGB gain is to adjust saturation and tone, not brightness. You'll notice if you set RGB to 100%, there is still the same (or nearly the same) range of possible white points depending on brightness and contrast levels. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Do I really need monitor calibration if.... | Dave R knows who | Digital Photography | 20 | February 18th 05 02:10 AM |
Colorvision PrintFix & borderless printing | Alan Justice | Digital Photography | 1 | February 5th 05 08:44 PM |
Monitor calibration (mac) | John McWilliams | Digital Photography | 9 | December 6th 04 05:18 PM |
Monitor Calibration Tools | Rita Ä Berkowitz | Digital Photography | 12 | December 1st 04 09:58 PM |
color calibration of microscopic images | Beatrice | Digital Photography | 2 | August 30th 04 05:22 PM |