Linear pano - halfway home!

On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:57:33 -0700, Annika1980 wrote:

Here's what I have so far. It is kind of sloppy in spots, especially
the sidewalk and the roof. I think I'll re-shoot it with a lot more
images.

http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/100193296/original

Too bad. All one has to do is to look at the way the shingles line up to
tell what you've done.

ray wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jul 2008 20:57:33 -0700, Annika1980 wrote:

Here's what I have so far. It is kind of sloppy in spots, especially
the sidewalk and the roof. I think I'll re-shoot it with a lot more
images.

http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/100193296/original

Too bad. All one has to do is to look at the way the shingles line up to
tell what you've done.

Wrong lens, wrong sky.

--
john mcwilliams

Rita Berkowitz wrote:
ray wrote:

Here's what I have so far. It is kind of sloppy in spots, especially
the sidewalk and the roof. I think I'll re-shoot it with a lot more
images.

http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/100193296/original

Too bad. All one has to do is to look at the way the shingles line up
to tell what you've done.

That's ****en awful! He used the wrong lens. This should have been
shot at
300mm.



Rita



I think that he is a brave man to be hanging about outside an elementary
school with a camera.

Cal

Rita Berkowitz wrote:
Cal I Fornicate wrote:

Too bad. All one has to do is to look at the way the shingles line
up to tell what you've done.

That's ****en awful! He used the wrong lens. This should have been
shot at
300mm.

I think that he is a brave man to be hanging about outside an
elementary school with a camera.

Good point, but that's second nature for him. We've had this discussion
before and I'll refrain from commenting on it any further since I'm sure
he's 'thinking of the children' in that special way.

Perversions are down the hall. This is Arguments.

--
lsmft

Rita Berkowitz wrote:
ray wrote:

Here's what I have so far. It is kind of sloppy in spots, especially
the sidewalk and the roof. I think I'll re-shoot it with a lot more
images.

http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/100193296/original

Too bad. All one has to do is to look at the way the shingles line up
to tell what you've done.

That's ****en awful! He used the wrong lens. This should have been
shot at
300mm.



Rita

Shhhh Rita. Tell him these sort of secrets and next thing you'll see him
out with the cell phone doing it all over again.

Cal I Fornicate wrote:
Rita Berkowitz wrote:
ray wrote:

Here's what I have so far. It is kind of sloppy in spots, especially
the sidewalk and the roof. I think I'll re-shoot it with a lot more
images.

http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/100193296/original

Too bad. All one has to do is to look at the way the shingles line up
to tell what you've done.

That's ****en awful! He used the wrong lens. This should have been
shot at
300mm.



Rita



I think that he is a brave man to be hanging about outside an elementary
school with a camera.

Cal

Well he is known to dabble in a bit of pornography you know?

"Nice Mice" wrote in message
...
Rita Berkowitz wrote:
ray wrote:

Here's what I have so far. It is kind of sloppy in spots, especially
the sidewalk and the roof. I think I'll re-shoot it with a lot more
images.

http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/100193296/original

Too bad. All one has to do is to look at the way the shingles line up
to tell what you've done.

That's ****en awful! He used the wrong lens. This should have been shot
at
300mm.



Rita

Shhhh Rita. Tell him these sort of secrets and next thing you'll see him
out with the cell phone doing it all over again.

Cell phone??? Good one Doogle..................