If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Panasonic Lumix Fz8 vs Fz50
I went to a photo shop and take a look at both cameras. I checked the
Lumix brochure, in which the two camera's features are compared side by side. I seem to notice that there are generally very small differences between the two cameras. FZ50 is approx. 50% more expensive, larger size or bulkier,10 MP instead of 7 MP, almost double in its weight, and has a hotshoe flash. My question is whether it is worth to go to spend 50% more, if you only want to need to take just regular good quality still photos. Sample pictures comparing the two cameras seem to show just a tiny bit better quality on the photos for Fz50. But it is so much bulkier and heavier than the Fz8. However, I do like the feel on the Fz50 than the Fz8. I am curious to know if any of the readers here bought the Fz8 and wondering if he/she should have opt for the Fz50 instead. Thanks for info |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Panasonic Lumix Fz8 vs Fz50
On May 21, 12:21 am, wrote:
I am curious to know if any of the readers here bought the Fz8 and wondering if he/she should have opt for the Fz50 instead. Thanks for info I brushed both FZ30 and FZ7 aside, and got LX1. I was concerned with the pocketability of the camera in the first intance. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Panasonic Lumix Fz8 vs Fz50
If the sensors are the same size (I'm certain that they are) the 7 megapixel
will give overall better results than the 10 megapixel, which will have considerably more noise in the image, and will produce generally poorer results hat higher ISO settings. Since a 4" x 6" print only requires 2 megapixels for a good print, the 7 megapixel is more than enough. -- I really hate to eat on an empty stomach. Stan Beck From New Orleans to Brandon MS To reply, remove 101 from address. *** wrote in message oups.com... I went to a photo shop and take a look at both cameras. I checked the Lumix brochure, in which the two camera's features are compared side by side. I seem to notice that there are generally very small differences between the two cameras. FZ50 is approx. 50% more expensive, larger size or bulkier,10 MP instead of 7 MP, almost double in its weight, and has a hotshoe flash. My question is whether it is worth to go to spend 50% more, if you only want to need to take just regular good quality still photos. Sample pictures comparing the two cameras seem to show just a tiny bit better quality on the photos for Fz50. But it is so much bulkier and heavier than the Fz8. However, I do like the feel on the Fz50 than the Fz8. I am curious to know if any of the readers here bought the Fz8 and wondering if he/she should have opt for the Fz50 instead. Thanks for info |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Panasonic Lumix Fz8 vs Fz50
On May 20, 12:22 pm, "Stan Beck"
wrote: If the sensors are the same size (I'm certain that they are) the 7 megapixel will give overall better results than the 10 megapixel, which will have considerably more noise in the image, and will produce generally poorer results hat higher ISO settings. Since a 4" x 6" print only requires 2 megapixels for a good print, the 7 megapixel is more than enough. -- I really hate to eat on an empty stomach. Stan Beck From New Orleans to Brandon MS To reply, remove 101 from address. *** I forgot to mention another difference between the Fz8 and Fz50 - Fz50's sensor is larger than the Fz8's ( 1/1.8" vs 1/2.5") |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Panasonic Lumix Fz8 vs Fz50
wrote in message oups.com... I went to a photo shop and take a look at both cameras. I checked the Lumix brochure, in which the two camera's features are compared side by side. I seem to notice that there are generally very small differences between the two cameras. FZ50 is approx. 50% more expensive, larger size or bulkier,10 MP instead of 7 MP, almost double in its weight, and has a hotshoe flash. My question is whether it is worth to go to spend 50% more, if you only want to need to take just regular good quality still photos. Sample pictures comparing the two cameras seem to show just a tiny bit better quality on the photos for Fz50. But it is so much bulkier and heavier than the Fz8. However, I do like the feel on the Fz50 than the Fz8. I am curious to know if any of the readers here bought the Fz8 and wondering if he/she should have opt for the Fz50 instead. Thanks for info FWIW, I have an FZ30, and it is an unmitigated complete POS. I get much better results from my teeny little Nikon L3. I would pass (by a few miles) any large Panasonic. -- Jeff R. (no kidding - its *horrible*) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Panasonic Lumix Fz8 vs Fz50
Jeff R. wrote:
[] FWIW, I have an FZ30, and it is an unmitigated complete POS. I get much better results from my teeny little Nikon L3. I would pass (by a few miles) any large Panasonic. The Leica optics used on Panasonic cameras should allow them to produce excellent results, bearing in mind the small sensor and therefore using ISO 100 or lower for best quality. Perhaps the automatic higher-ISO-boost is better turned off. David |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Panasonic Lumix Fz8 vs Fz50
On May 21, 10:05 am, "Jeff R." wrote:
wrote in message oups.com... I went to a photo shop and take a look at both cameras. I checked the Lumix brochure, in which the two camera's features are compared side by side. I seem to notice that there are generally very small differences between the two cameras.FZ50is approx. 50% more expensive, larger size or bulkier,10 MP instead of 7 MP, almost double in its weight, and has a hotshoe flash. My question is whether it is worth to go to spend 50% more, if you only want to need to take just regular good quality still photos. Sample pictures comparing the two cameras seem to show just a tiny bit better quality on the photos forFz50. But it is so much bulkier and heavier than theFz8. However, I do like the feel on theFz50than the Fz8. I am curious to know if any of the readers here bought theFz8 and wondering if he/she should have opt for theFz50instead. Thanks for info FWIW, I have an FZ30, and it is an unmitigated complete POS. I get much better results from my teeny little Nikon L3. I would pass (by a few miles) any large Panasonic. -- Jeff R. (no kidding - its *horrible*) I strongly dissagree. I owned an FZ30 for a while before moving to a dSLR. I found it a great camera to use - easily the best P&S I've owned - and got some nice shots with it. It's got a decent lens and good controls that give quick access to most settings. The only major gripe I had with it is the high level of noise from the sensor (or associated major artifacts from the Noise reduction in the camera). However this does not normally affect standard prints really - it's of most concern when trying to shoot in low light (which is this camera is very bad at) or when printing at large sizes. This camera (and the FZ50) offers a lot of great features (including v good optical IS/VR), and a build standard higher than many entry level dSLRs - calling it a POS is just OTT. What were your specific problems with it? (I assume it was noise/noise reduction related). S |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Panasonic Lumix Fz8 vs Fz50
I think you will find this interesting reading:
http://www.dpreview.com/articles/compactcamerahighiso/ -- I really hate to eat on an empty stomach. Stan Beck From New Orleans to Brandon MS To reply, remove 101 from address. *** wrote in message ups.com... On May 20, 12:22 pm, "Stan Beck" wrote: If the sensors are the same size (I'm certain that they are) the 7 megapixel will give overall better results than the 10 megapixel, which will have considerably more noise in the image, and will produce generally poorer results hat higher ISO settings. Since a 4" x 6" print only requires 2 megapixels for a good print, the 7 megapixel is more than enough. -- I really hate to eat on an empty stomach. Stan Beck From New Orleans to Brandon MS To reply, remove 101 from address. *** I forgot to mention another difference between the Fz8 and Fz50 - Fz50's sensor is larger than the Fz8's ( 1/1.8" vs 1/2.5") |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Panasonic Lumix Fz8 vs Fz50
I have a Panasonic FZ10, and it's a great little camera, for it's class, and
was better than most of the comparable cameras of that time. But I can't really compare it to my Nikon D200. Naturally, my D200 photos are better. -- I really hate to eat on an empty stomach. Stan Beck From New Orleans to Brandon MS To reply, remove 101 from address. *** wrote in message oups.com... On May 21, 10:05 am, "Jeff R." wrote: wrote in message oups.com... I went to a photo shop and take a look at both cameras. I checked the Lumix brochure, in which the two camera's features are compared side by side. I seem to notice that there are generally very small differences between the two cameras.FZ50is approx. 50% more expensive, larger size or bulkier,10 MP instead of 7 MP, almost double in its weight, and has a hotshoe flash. My question is whether it is worth to go to spend 50% more, if you only want to need to take just regular good quality still photos. Sample pictures comparing the two cameras seem to show just a tiny bit better quality on the photos forFz50. But it is so much bulkier and heavier than theFz8. However, I do like the feel on theFz50than the Fz8. I am curious to know if any of the readers here bought theFz8 and wondering if he/she should have opt for theFz50instead. Thanks for info FWIW, I have an FZ30, and it is an unmitigated complete POS. I get much better results from my teeny little Nikon L3. I would pass (by a few miles) any large Panasonic. -- Jeff R. (no kidding - its *horrible*) I strongly dissagree. I owned an FZ30 for a while before moving to a dSLR. I found it a great camera to use - easily the best P&S I've owned - and got some nice shots with it. It's got a decent lens and good controls that give quick access to most settings. The only major gripe I had with it is the high level of noise from the sensor (or associated major artifacts from the Noise reduction in the camera). However this does not normally affect standard prints really - it's of most concern when trying to shoot in low light (which is this camera is very bad at) or when printing at large sizes. This camera (and the FZ50) offers a lot of great features (including v good optical IS/VR), and a build standard higher than many entry level dSLRs - calling it a POS is just OTT. What were your specific problems with it? (I assume it was noise/noise reduction related). S |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Panasonic Lumix Fz8 vs Fz50
In message , Jeff R.
writes wrote in message roups.com... I went to a photo shop and take a look at both cameras. I checked the Lumix brochure, in which the two camera's features are compared side by side. I seem to notice that there are generally very small differences between the two cameras. FZ50 is approx. 50% more expensive, larger size or bulkier,10 MP instead of 7 MP, almost double in its weight, and has a hotshoe flash. My question is whether it is worth to go to spend 50% more, if you only want to need to take just regular good quality still photos. Sample pictures comparing the two cameras seem to show just a tiny bit better quality on the photos for Fz50. But it is so much bulkier and heavier than the Fz8. However, I do like the feel on the Fz50 than the Fz8. I am curious to know if any of the readers here bought the Fz8 and wondering if he/she should have opt for the Fz50 instead. Thanks for info FWIW, I have an FZ30, and it is an unmitigated complete POS. I get much better results from my teeny little Nikon L3. I would pass (by a few miles) any large Panasonic. -- Jeff R. (no kidding - its *horrible*) I have to differ here. The only two complaints I have with my FZ30 is that the zoom ought to equate to a 28-300mm rather than the 35-420mm that it is. It would be useful to have more wide-angle capability, as the extreme telephoto length never gets used. The other problem is a tendency to purple-fringing on some high-contrast parts of a picture. Overall, it's still among the best prosumer wide-range zoom cameras. -- Chris Morriss |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Need info on Panasonic/Lumix FZ50 | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 2 | May 12th 07 09:41 PM |
Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ50 video problem? | Glenn[_2_] | Digital ZLR Cameras | 8 | March 22nd 07 05:09 PM |
Help - Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ50 and Genrad Strobotac | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 6 | February 2nd 07 08:41 PM |
ISO vz Zoom trade off ( Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ50 ) ? | B Thomas | Digital Photography | 2 | December 12th 06 04:04 PM |
Lumix DMC-FZ50 | luk | Digital Photography | 15 | September 7th 06 04:00 PM |