![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
1. Nikon is better than Canon
2. Canon is better than Nikon 3. One is not better than the other but they are different. Most of the features are the same but are presented a little different. Each depending on the model has some advantage over the other. The results may be a little different (sharpness, color etc) on model model in some circumstances sometimes but the actual quality is quite comparable. One is really not better but may be preferred. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Bert Hyman
wrote: In measekite wrote: !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" html head /head body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000" What? Several of us regulars have told him to stop posting in HTML, but he's apparently severely retarded. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , measekite
wrote: !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" html head /head body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000" font face="sans-serif"1. Nikon is better than Canonbr br 2. Canon is better than Nikonbr br 3. One is not better than the other but they are different. Most of the features are the same but are presented a little different. Each depending on the model has some advantage over the other. The results may be a little different (sharpness, color etc) on model model in some circumstances sometimes but the actual quality is quite comparable. One is really not better but may be preferred.br /font /body /html Is posting in HTML better than plain text? Depends on whether or not you're retarded. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 17:34:14 GMT 'measekite' wrote this on rec.photo.digital: !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN" html head /head body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000" font face="sans-serif"1. Nikon is better than Canonbr br 2. Canon is better than Nikonbr br 3. One is not better than the other but they are different. Most of the features are the same but are presented a little different. Each depending on the model has some advantage over the other. The results may be a little different (sharpness, color etc) on model model in some circumstances sometimes but the actual quality is quite comparable. One is really not better but may be preferred.br /font /body /html Would you like to post in English please. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
for a really fair opinion on the Canon/Nikon debate,
ask Rita - she posts here frequently(!) now back to the serious stuff... which is better - posting in HTML, or posting in XML ? :-) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Troll.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Mr. Strat wrote: In article , measekite wrote: <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> <font face="sans-serif">1.&nbsp; Nikon is better than Canon<br> <br> 2.&nbsp; Canon is better than Nikon<br> <br> 3.&nbsp; One is not better than the other but they are different.&nbsp; Most of the features are the same but are presented a little different.&nbsp; Each depending on the model has some advantage over the other.&nbsp; The results may be a little different (sharpness, color etc) on model model in some circumstances sometimes but the actual quality is quite comparable.&nbsp; One is really not better but may be preferred.<br> </font> </body> </html> Is posting in HTML better than plain text? Yes Except for the snip retarded. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() canon.user wrote: On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 17:34:14 GMT 'measekite' wrote this on rec.photo.digital: <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> <font face="sans-serif">1.&nbsp; Nikon is better than Canon<br> <br> 2.&nbsp; Canon is better than Nikon<br> <br> 3.&nbsp; One is not better than the other but they are different.&nbsp; Most of the features are the same but are presented a little different.&nbsp; Each depending on the model has some advantage over the other.&nbsp; The results may be a little different (sharpness, color etc) on model model in some circumstances sometimes but the actual quality is quite comparable.&nbsp; One is really not better but may be preferred.<br> </font> </body> </html> Would you like to post in English please. It is quite apparent you do not know how to read |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|