Which do you beleive

**measekite** · #1 April 12th 08, 06:34 PM posted to rec.photo.digital

1.  Nikon is better than Canon

2.  Canon is better than Nikon

3.  One is not better than the other but they are different.  Most of the features are the same but are presented a little different.  Each depending on the model has some advantage over the other.  The results may be a little different (sharpness, color etc) on model model in some circumstances sometimes but the actual quality is quite comparable.  One is really not better but may be preferred.

**Bert Hyman** · #2 April 12th 08, 06:45 PM posted to rec.photo.digital

In measekite
wrote:

!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"
html
head
/head
body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"

What?

--
Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN

**Mr. Strat** · #3 April 12th 08, 07:03 PM posted to rec.photo.digital

In article , Bert Hyman
wrote:

In measekite
wrote:

!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"
html
head
/head
body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"

What?

Several of us regulars have told him to stop posting in HTML, but he's
apparently severely retarded.

**Mr. Strat** · #4 April 12th 08, 07:03 PM posted to rec.photo.digital

In article , measekite
wrote:

!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"
html
head
/head
body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"
font face="sans-serif"1.  Nikon is better than Canonbr
br
2.  Canon is better than Nikonbr
br
3.  One is not better than the other but they are different.  Most
of
the features are the same but are presented a little different.  Each
depending on the model has some advantage over the other.  The results
may be a little different (sharpness, color etc) on model model in some
circumstances sometimes but the actual quality is quite comparable. 
One is really not better but may be preferred.br
/font
/body
/html

Is posting in HTML better than plain text?

Depends on whether or not you're retarded.

**canon.user[_2_]** · #5 April 12th 08, 07:08 PM posted to rec.photo.digital

On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 17:34:14 GMT 'measekite'
wrote this on rec.photo.digital:

!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"
html
head
/head
body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"
font face="sans-serif"1.  Nikon is better than Canonbr
br
2.  Canon is better than Nikonbr
br
3.  One is not better than the other but they are different.  Most of
the features are the same but are presented a little different.  Each
depending on the model has some advantage over the other.  The results
may be a little different (sharpness, color etc) on model model in some
circumstances sometimes but the actual quality is quite comparable. 
One is really not better but may be preferred.br
/font
/body
/html

Would you like to post in English please.

**[email protected]** · #6 April 12th 08, 07:23 PM posted to rec.photo.digital

for a really fair opinion on the Canon/Nikon debate,
ask Rita - she posts here frequently(!)

now back to the serious stuff... which is better -
posting in HTML, or posting in XML ?

:-)

**G. Paleologopoulos** · #7 April 12th 08, 09:25 PM posted to rec.photo.digital

Troll.

**measekite** · #8 April 12th 08, 10:12 PM posted to rec.photo.digital

Mr. Strat wrote:

In article , Bert Hyman wrote:

In measekite wrote:

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">

What?

Several of us regulars have told him to stop posting in HTML, but he's apparently severely retarded.

Are you a regular because you take exlax or just eating a lot of prunes

**measekite** · #9 April 12th 08, 10:13 PM posted to rec.photo.digital

Mr. Strat wrote:

In article , measekite wrote:

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> 1.&nbsp; Nikon is better than Canon 2.&nbsp; Canon is better than Nikon 3.&nbsp; One is not better than the other but they are different.&nbsp; Most of the features are the same but are presented a little different.&nbsp; Each depending on the model has some advantage over the other.&nbsp; The results may be a little different (sharpness, color etc) on model model in some circumstances sometimes but the actual quality is quite comparable.&nbsp; One is really not better but may be preferred. </body> </html>

Is posting in HTML better than plain text?

Yes

Except for the

snip

retarded.

**measekite** · #10 April 12th 08, 10:14 PM posted to rec.photo.digital

canon.user wrote:

On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 17:34:14 GMT 'measekite' wrote this on rec.photo.digital:

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> 1.&nbsp; Nikon is better than Canon 2.&nbsp; Canon is better than Nikon 3.&nbsp; One is not better than the other but they are different.&nbsp; Most of the features are the same but are presented a little different.&nbsp; Each depending on the model has some advantage over the other.&nbsp; The results may be a little different (sharpness, color etc) on model model in some circumstances sometimes but the actual quality is quite comparable.&nbsp; One is really not better but may be preferred. </body> </html>

Would you like to post in English please.

It is quite apparent you do not know how to read

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode