OT but still photography

"Julian Barkway" wrote:
"David J. Littleboy" spake thusly to the assembled
multitudes, agog with barely concealed anticipation:
But jjs is right: Fuji 645s are expensive.

You'll look at the slides from it, and they'll look sharp. You'll pull
out
your best loupe, and they'll still look sharp. You'll put one under a 60x
microscope, and it'll still be sharp.

And then you'll by a Nikon 8000 or 9000, since that's the only way you
can
get the detail off the slides.

a) Assuming you want to scan the shots in the first place and

I do: don't have space for a darkroom, and wouldn't want to do color
chemistry even if I did. And photography is about making one's own prints.

b) assuming one of the more recent flatbeds doesn't actually meet your
requirements...

Tried that. Not even close.

David J. Littleboy
Tokyo, Japan