If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
Film Lover's Lament
On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 23:13:31 GMT, no_name
wrote: Actually, I think it has more to do with micro-fiche can be read with absolutely no electricity. No kidding? So they're viewed by candle light? rafe b www.terrapinphoto.com |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
Film Lover's Lament
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 11:48:24 +1200, Colin D
wrote: That was until somebody realized that valves were immune to radiation and magnetic pulses, whereas solid state ... That's a crock. Electrons (or ions) in motion (ie., as in "valves") are *most definitely* affected by magnetic fields. rafe b www.terrapinphoto.com |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
Film Lover's Lament
rafe b wrote: On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 11:48:24 +1200, Colin D wrote: That was until somebody realized that valves were immune to radiation and magnetic pulses, whereas solid state ... That's a crock. Electrons (or ions) in motion (ie., as in "valves") are *most definitely* affected by magnetic fields. rafe b www.terrapinphoto.com You miss the point, Rafe. Solid-state/semi-conductor junctions are *destroyed* by the likes of magnetic pulses from nuclear explosions. Valves are not. Colin D. |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
Film Lover's Lament
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 14:09:40 +1200, Colin D
wrote: You miss the point, Rafe. Solid-state/semi-conductor junctions are *destroyed* by the likes of magnetic pulses from nuclear explosions. Valves are not. Yeah, really. One nuclear bomb can ruin your whole day. rafe b www.terrapinphoto.com |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
Film Lover's Lament
rafe b wrote: On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 14:09:40 +1200, Colin D wrote: You miss the point, Rafe. Solid-state/semi-conductor junctions are *destroyed* by the likes of magnetic pulses from nuclear explosions. Valves are not. Yeah, really. One nuclear bomb can ruin your whole day. rafe b www.terrapinphoto.com Jesus. Something got up your nose, then? Colin D. |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
Film Lover's Lament
"Colin D" wrote in message ... You miss the point, Rafe. Solid-state/semi-conductor junctions are *destroyed* by the likes of magnetic pulses from nuclear explosions. Valves are not. Colin D. For the young, the valves Colin is referring to are usually called vacuum tubes in the US. (I still use a pair of them in my RF amp.) T.W. |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
Film Lover's Lament
"Taswolf" wrote in message ... "Colin D" wrote in message ... You miss the point, Rafe. Solid-state/semi-conductor junctions are *destroyed* by the likes of magnetic pulses from nuclear explosions. Valves are not. Colin D. For the young, the valves Colin is referring to are usually called vacuum tubes in the US. (I still use a pair of them in my RF amp.) T.W. Digitally-archived files are not going to withstand the effects of war or vandals or thieves. And, if the nuclear weapon is strong enough to wipe out the data, it will probably wipe out all human life in the area too, making the whole argument moot. But, assuming that normal storage conditions apply, the use of microfilm (for documents) continues to offer a degree of assurance that the information will remain readable regardless of the impact of changes in the hardware or the image file formats that will change over time. I thought that microfilm was dead, but I've learned that it is a robust solution to the risks associated with media and file format obsolescence. It is a virtual certainty that nobody but a handful of specialists will have the capability of decoding files stored on today's digital media in 500 years. As antiquated as microfilm may be, if it can be saved it can be read. |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
Film Lover's Lament
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 12:43:17 GMT, "Jeremy" wrote:
Digitally-archived files are not going to withstand the effects of war or vandals or thieves. And, if the nuclear weapon is strong enough to wipe out the data, it will probably wipe out all human life in the area too, making the whole argument moot. So who cares? Do you really think your photos are more important than the next global war? Why not put your energy into preventing *that* instead of worrying about whether your precious photos will survive it. Sheesh. rafe b www.terrapinphoto.com |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
Film Lover's Lament
"Colin D" wrote in message ... rafe b wrote: On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 14:09:40 +1200, Colin D wrote: You miss the point, Rafe. Solid-state/semi-conductor junctions are *destroyed* by the likes of magnetic pulses from nuclear explosions. Valves are not. Yeah, really. One nuclear bomb can ruin your whole day. You mean I might not be able to listen to Rush during a nuclear attack? |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
Film Lover's Lament
William Graham wrote: "Colin D" wrote in message ... rafe b wrote: On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 14:09:40 +1200, Colin D wrote: You miss the point, Rafe. Solid-state/semi-conductor junctions are *destroyed* by the likes of magnetic pulses from nuclear explosions. Valves are not. Yeah, really. One nuclear bomb can ruin your whole day. You mean I might not be able to listen to Rush during a nuclear attack? If we are lucky Rush would be standing at ground zero. Scott |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Elementary questions on film handling. | Liopleurodon | In The Darkroom | 22 | December 8th 05 06:37 AM |
"Nature's Best" contest and film vs digital | Bill Hilton | Photographing Nature | 15 | December 7th 05 11:03 PM |
"Nature's Best" contest and film vs digital | Bill Hilton | Digital Photography | 1 | November 28th 05 07:44 PM |
What film? | Art Reitsch | Large Format Photography Equipment | 5 | November 10th 05 12:14 PM |
The first film of the Digital Revolution is here.... | Todd Bailey | Film & Labs | 0 | May 27th 04 08:12 AM |