If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Now all I need is a 4x5 digital back.
Chroma camera
https://www.dpreview.com/news/363112...4-field-camera Apologies for no TinyURL. That's a decision made by Firefox. :-( -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Now all I need is a 4x5 digital back.
In article , Eric Stevens
wrote: Chroma camera https://www.dpreview.com/news/363112...ight-affordabl e-easy-to-use-5x4-field-camera film, not digital. Apologies for no TinyURL. That's a decision made by Firefox. :-( there's never a need for that on usenet, nor is the decision up to firefox. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Now all I need is a 4x5 digital back.
On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:14:29 -0500, nospam
wrote: In article , Eric Stevens wrote: Chroma camera https://www.dpreview.com/news/363112...ight-affordabl e-easy-to-use-5x4-field-camera film, not digital. Read the subject line. Apologies for no TinyURL. That's a decision made by Firefox. :-( there's never a need for that on usenet, nor is the decision up to firefox. It is on this occasion. It's been removed from my tool bar on security grounds. -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Now all I need is a 4x5 digital back.
In article , Eric Stevens
wrote: https://www.dpreview.com/news/363112...tweight-afford able-easy-to-use-5x4-field-camera film, not digital. Read the subject line. read the name of the newsgroup. Apologies for no TinyURL. That's a decision made by Firefox. :-( there's never a need for that on usenet, nor is the decision up to firefox. It is on this occasion. It's been removed from my tool bar on security grounds. tinyurl doesn't need a toolbar item, and as i said, there's no need for url shorterners on usenet. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Now all I need is a 4x5 digital back.
rOn Fri, 23 Feb 2018 18:00:25 -0500, nospam
wrote: In article , Eric Stevens wrote: https://www.dpreview.com/news/363112...tweight-afford able-easy-to-use-5x4-field-camera film, not digital. Read the subject line. read the name of the newsgroup. You f***ing idiot! Why do you think I put the words "digital back" into the heading? Don't you know what a digital back is? Just look at this one, for example (one of many). https://fotodioxpro.com/products/hbh-4x5-pro or this one http://www.digital-photography.org/D..._field_pro.htm Apologies for no TinyURL. That's a decision made by Firefox. :-( there's never a need for that on usenet, nor is the decision up to firefox. It is on this occasion. It's been removed from my tool bar on security grounds. tinyurl doesn't need a toolbar item, and as i said, there's no need for url shorterners on usenet. -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Now all I need is a 4x5 digital back.
In article , Eric Stevens
wrote: https://www.dpreview.com/news/363112...ightweight-aff ordable-easy-to-use-5x4-field-camera film, not digital. Read the subject line. read the name of the newsgroup. You f***ing idiot! Why do you think I put the words "digital back" into the heading? Don't you know what a digital back is? i do, but don't expect to find one that's any good a price you can afford. Just look at this one, for example (one of many). https://fotodioxpro.com/products/hbh-4x5-pro junk. laughably so. why bother using a 4x5 camera if you're only going to mount an slr on the back? or this one http://www.digital-photography.org/D...al/dicomed_fie ld_pro.htm that article is almost 20 years old, but at least they used a mac, except that particular mac is long discontinued, so even if you can find the back, it won't do you any good. here's a bunch of backs, using that 'new high-speed usb 2' technology: http://www.betterlight.com/products4X5.html the cheaper ones have less resolution than modern slrs and their top of the line model is about what a medium format camera can do. and then there's that perfectly still subject problem. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Now all I need is a 4x5 digital back.
On 2018-02-23 17:58, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:14:29 -0500, nospam wrote: In article , Eric Stevens wrote: Chroma camera https://www.dpreview.com/news/363112...ight-affordabl e-easy-to-use-5x4-field-camera film, not digital. Read the subject line. Apologies for no TinyURL. That's a decision made by Firefox. :-( there's never a need for that on usenet, nor is the decision up to firefox. It is on this occasion. It's been removed from my tool bar on security grounds. 1) You can just type "tinyurl" in the url bar and a link to it will appear quickly. 2) You can put a bookbar shortcut in the bookmarks toolbar. Not sure what the security issue could be as long as you edit the bookmarks yourself. (Unless Firefox has some peculiar fault). -- “When it is all said and done, there are approximately 94 million full-time workers in private industry paying taxes to support 102 million non-workers and 21 million government workers. In what world does this represent a strong job market?” ..Jim Quinn |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Now all I need is a 4x5 digital back.
On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 18:31:47 -0500, Alan Browne
wrote: On 2018-02-23 17:58, Eric Stevens wrote: On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 16:14:29 -0500, nospam wrote: In article , Eric Stevens wrote: Chroma camera https://www.dpreview.com/news/363112...ight-affordabl e-easy-to-use-5x4-field-camera film, not digital. Read the subject line. Apologies for no TinyURL. That's a decision made by Firefox. :-( there's never a need for that on usenet, nor is the decision up to firefox. It is on this occasion. It's been removed from my tool bar on security grounds. 1) You can just type "tinyurl" in the url bar and a link to it will appear quickly. 2) You can put a bookbar shortcut in the bookmarks toolbar. Agreed, but not as convenient as having it on the tool bar. I used to be able to click on the tool bar and within a second or so I had it in in the cliboard. Not sure what the security issue could be as long as you edit the bookmarks yourself. (Unless Firefox has some peculiar fault). Something to do with lack of https. -- Regards, Eric Stevens |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Now all I need is a 4x5 digital back.
On 2018-02-23 23:17, Eric Stevens wrote:
On Fri, 23 Feb 2018 18:31:47 -0500, Alan Browne wrote: Not sure what the security issue could be as long as you edit the bookmarks yourself. (Unless Firefox has some peculiar fault). Something to do with lack of https. tinurl comes up https here. -- “When it is all said and done, there are approximately 94 million full-time workers in private industry paying taxes to support 102 million non-workers and 21 million government workers. In what world does this represent a strong job market?” ..Jim Quinn |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Now all I need is a 4x5 digital back.
On 23/02/2018 21:14, nospam wrote:
In article , Eric Stevens wrote: Chroma camera https://www.dpreview.com/news/363112...ight-affordabl e-easy-to-use-5x4-field-camera film, not digital. Apologies for no TinyURL. That's a decision made by Firefox. :-( there's never a need for that on usenet, There is if you use Thunderbird ;-) -- Cheers, Rob |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
digital back for sf1 | biffster | Digital Photography | 4 | April 28th 08 01:53 AM |
Digital back for F3? | Aaron Blacksmith | Digital SLR Cameras | 14 | May 13th 05 05:03 PM |
digital back on MF vs digital 35mm? | ColdCanuck | Digital Photography | 12 | January 15th 05 12:00 AM |
digital back on MF vs digital 35mm? | ColdCanuck | Digital Photography | 0 | January 14th 05 05:59 AM |
Digital back! | Mojtaba | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 8 | August 19th 04 11:17 PM |