A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Photo Equipment » Medium Format Photography Equipment
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Going back to film...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 27th 10, 05:15 AM posted to rec.photo.equipment.medium-format
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 428
Default Going back to film...

After shooting mostly digital for years (and getting burnt out on my
photography) I am shifting gears and going back to shooting 120 film.
While obviously shooting digital is easier and cheaper, I'm just not
getting the results from my landscape photography like I used to. What
made me realize I want to start shooting film again was when I got some
proofs back from an old Ikoflex TLR I was given and had repaired. They
had a smooth tonal, 3D look I haven't seen in years!

It wasn't even a top shelf model (had the 3 element novar lens) but
when I saw the 5X5 proofs, I remember why I loved shooting medium format
film. I'm sure not gonna argue about why these images convinced me to
clean up my darkroom and go back to analog photography (including not
scan and print but optically printing again too) but there is something
magical about the look of an image from this medium to me. To be fair, I
was never happy with the results from 35mm film either..

I also found it interesting the local camera store told me film sales
has picked up and some of the working pro's have gone back to film for
some of their projects. I'm sure this is the point where some of the die
hard digital guys will explain that "You just don't what your doing as
digital is far superiour".. To those people, I could care less if you or
some web site has all sorts of data to "prove it".. I know what I see
and am going back to shooting 120 film :-)

Stephanie
  #2  
Old February 27th 10, 08:43 AM posted to rec.photo.equipment.medium-format
Richard Knoppow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 751
Default Going back to film...


wrote in message
...
After shooting mostly digital for years (and getting burnt
out on my photography) I am shifting gears and going back
to shooting 120 film. While obviously shooting digital is
easier and cheaper, I'm just not getting the results from
my landscape photography like I used to. What made me
realize I want to start shooting film again was when I got
some proofs back from an old Ikoflex TLR I was given and
had repaired. They had a smooth tonal, 3D look I haven't
seen in years!

It wasn't even a top shelf model (had the 3 element novar
lens) but when I saw the 5X5 proofs, I remember why I
loved shooting medium format film. I'm sure not gonna
argue about why these images convinced me to clean up my
darkroom and go back to analog photography (including not
scan and print but optically printing again too) but there
is something magical about the look of an image from this
medium to me. To be fair, I was never happy with the
results from 35mm film either..

I also found it interesting the local camera store told
me film sales has picked up and some of the working pro's
have gone back to film for some of their projects. I'm
sure this is the point where some of the die hard digital
guys will explain that "You just don't what your doing as
digital is far superiour".. To those people, I could care
less if you or some web site has all sorts of data to
"prove it".. I know what I see and am going back to
shooting 120 film :-)

Stephanie


Welcome to the club Stephanie. While I certainly
recognize that digital, or perhaps electronic is a better
name, photography has a number of advantages, especially for
commercial photographers, I still like working with film and
printing on paper. There is still a fair variety of
materials available. Ilford, in particular, seems to have
undertaken to make sure there is an adequate supply of
traditional photographic materials and chemistry of good
quality. I still like Kodak products a lot but they seem
bound and determined to destroy what little market they have
left.
This group, the medium format group, and the darkroom
group seem to still have a bit of life in them.
The Ikoflex was a very respectible camera, well made and
with good lenses. I shoot mostly Rolleiflex's in this format
but my favorite is a Rollicord IV.


--
--
Richard Knoppow
Los Angeles, CA, USA



  #4  
Old February 27th 10, 04:05 PM posted to rec.photo.equipment.medium-format
Alan Browne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12,640
Default Going back to film...

On 10-02-26 23:15 , wrote:
After shooting mostly digital for years (and getting burnt out on my
photography) I am shifting gears and going back to shooting 120 film.
While obviously shooting digital is easier and cheaper, I'm just not
getting the results from my landscape photography like I used to. What
made me realize I want to start shooting film again was when I got some
proofs back from an old Ikoflex TLR I was given and had repaired. They
had a smooth tonal, 3D look I haven't seen in years!

It wasn't even a top shelf model (had the 3 element novar lens) but when
I saw the 5X5 proofs, I remember why I loved shooting medium format
film. I'm sure not gonna argue about why these images convinced me to
clean up my darkroom and go back to analog photography (including not
scan and print but optically printing again too) but there is something
magical about the look of an image from this medium to me. To be fair, I
was never happy with the results from 35mm film either..

I also found it interesting the local camera store told me film sales
has picked up and some of the working pro's have gone back to film for
some of their projects. I'm sure this is the point where some of the die
hard digital guys will explain that "You just don't what your doing as
digital is far superiour".. To those people, I could care less if you or
some web site has all sorts of data to "prove it".. I know what I see
and am going back to shooting 120 film :-)


Good for you. My 'blad does not get the use it deserves and a lot of
film is sleeping in the freezer.

By the way, the term "analog" isn't very good. Just say film. It's not
an analog, it's an image.

(For that matter what makes a digital camera work is the very analog
sensor and bucket brigade emptying of same).

You can also use a digital camera to preview a scene before committing
it to film. On my digital I can even preview in B&W...

A major attraction of digital is that you can shoot a lot more, with no
cost, loss or penalty and of course convenience. I have a 45 minute
round trip to drop off E-6 and again to pick it up.

--
gmail originated posts are filtered due to spam.
  #5  
Old February 27th 10, 05:02 PM posted to rec.photo.equipment.medium-format
Lawrence Akutagawa
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 145
Default Going back to film...


wrote in message ...
After shooting mostly digital for years (and getting burnt out on my
photography) I am shifting gears and going back to shooting 120 film.
While obviously shooting digital is easier and cheaper, I'm just not
getting the results from my landscape photography like I used to. What
made me realize I want to start shooting film again was when I got some
proofs back from an old Ikoflex TLR I was given and had repaired. They had
a smooth tonal, 3D look I haven't seen in years!

It wasn't even a top shelf model (had the 3 element novar lens) but when
I saw the 5X5 proofs, I remember why I loved shooting medium format film.
I'm sure not gonna argue about why these images convinced me to clean up
my darkroom and go back to analog photography (including not scan and
print but optically printing again too) but there is something magical
about the look of an image from this medium to me. To be fair, I was never
happy with the results from 35mm film either..

I also found it interesting the local camera store told me film sales has
picked up and some of the working pro's have gone back to film for some of
their projects. I'm sure this is the point where some of the die hard
digital guys will explain that "You just don't what your doing as digital
is far superiour".. To those people, I could care less if you or some web
site has all sorts of data to "prove it".. I know what I see and am going
back to shooting 120 film :-)
.

Stephanie -

Don't forget that stalwart of the silver based medium, Freestyle Sales.
http://www.freestylephoto.biz/


  #6  
Old February 27th 10, 07:27 PM posted to rec.photo.equipment.medium-format
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 428
Default Going back to film...

Alan Browne wrote:

A major attraction of digital is that you can shoot a lot more, with no
cost, loss or penalty and of course convenience.


This is one of the reasons for me to stop shooting digital.

On the analog issue, when you shoot film and optically print it in the
darkroom, that's pretty much an analog process don't ya think? There
isn't much analog about a digital camera other than the light hitting
the sensor. After that point, it's all digital. The image is converted
to digital data before it ever leaves the sensor.

Stephanie
  #8  
Old February 27th 10, 09:05 PM posted to rec.photo.equipment.medium-format
K W Hart
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 142
Default Going back to film...


wrote in message ...
After shooting mostly digital for years (and getting burnt out on my
photography) I am shifting gears and going back to shooting 120 film.
While obviously shooting digital is easier and cheaper, I'm just not
getting the results from my landscape photography like I used to. What
made me realize I want to start shooting film again was when I got some
proofs back from an old Ikoflex TLR I was given and had repaired. They had
a smooth tonal, 3D look I haven't seen in years!


I would argue that digital is not easier and cheaper, especially if you
consider your time to have value, and if you look at how quickly the digital
gear becomes out-dated. Every time I put a "new & improved" roll of film in
my camera, I'm upgrading the image sensor.
I just completed a modeling session with another photographer- actually I
was the gaffer on set, but I was shooting also. In the four hour shoot, he
ran through 4 memory cards; I shot two rolls of 24 exposure 35mm film. I'm
about to go into the darkroom to develope the negs (45min); he is going to
spend the next several hours eliminating the grossly bad shots (flash
misfires, model not ready, etc), then eliminating the shots that are
similar. Tomorrow, I'll spend about six hours printing the negs, he'll spend
twice that amount of time photo-shopping the images- removing stray hairs,
cloning out the light stand legs, etc. I made sure the model looked good and
there was nothing intruding on the set before I shot. In the end, we will
both have about the same number of 'keepers'.

It wasn't even a top shelf model (had the 3 element novar lens) but when
I saw the 5X5 proofs, I remember why I loved shooting medium format film.
I'm sure not gonna argue about why these images convinced me to clean up
my darkroom and go back to analog photography (including not scan and
print but optically printing again too) but there is something magical
about the look of an image from this medium to me. To be fair, I was never
happy with the results from 35mm film either..


I shoot 35mm, 6x6, 6x7, and 4x5". There is an obvious difference in optical
prints from each, but I think that below 16x20", it's difficult for most
people to tell the difference in film format for properly exposed negs. A
tripod can make a world of difference, especially in landscape work.
Many labs these days are scanning negs for printing. If your 5x5 proofs were
printed on a scan-to-print system (generally a minilab less than 10 years
old), make some optical prints and compare them- you may be in for another
pleasant suprize.

I also found it interesting the local camera store told me film sales has
picked up and some of the working pro's have gone back to film for some of
their projects. I'm sure this is the point where some of the die hard
digital guys will explain that "You just don't what your doing as digital
is far superiour".. To those people, I could care less if you or some web
site has all sorts of data to "prove it".. I know what I see and am going
back to shooting 120 film :-)

Stephanie



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
HELP PLEASE - APS REWIND BACK TO ZERO WITH NEW FILM Fred McKenzie APS Photographic Equipment 3 September 4th 04 09:56 PM
6X8 ROLL FILM BACK FOR 4X5 Massimiliano Spoto Fine Art, Framing and Display 0 May 20th 04 05:55 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.