If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Schneider 210mm Angulon.
John, just remembered this page: http://www.lensn2shutter.com/shutters.html#link5 has a
good list of the major shutters and thread diameters. erie |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Schneider 210mm Angulon.
They might be worth a little effort, depends on if you have a 159mm or thereabouts for the
8x10. Most likely the should screw right into a Betax/Alphax shutter, likely a #3 what diameter and approx. pitch are the threads? erie John J wrote: Jean-David Beyer wrote: I usually do not take lenses apart. Jean-David: I've two elements here of a Wollensak, Series IIIa, Ex WA, F/12.5 8x10. (Reading directly around the lens.) No shutter. Does anyone have specs for the 'tween the lens mounting? I do have several shutters ~#3 to use. Just never felt the need to go there. I've no idea if this is worth a thing. What ya all think? Dog? Saint? I use a Goerz ~180mm for 8x10 when I manage to shoot 8x10) and am fairly happy with it. Is the Wollensak worth a darn to mount up? jj |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Schneider 210mm Angulon.
(sorry for top-posting, but it works better for Erie.)
Yes, it does fit a #3. Found a broken one and it screwed right in. Whether the spacing is right or not - I'll find out! j erie patsellis wrote: They might be worth a little effort, depends on if you have a 159mm or thereabouts for the 8x10. Most likely the should screw right into a Betax/Alphax shutter, likely a #3 what diameter and approx. pitch are the threads? erie John J wrote: Jean-David Beyer wrote: I usually do not take lenses apart. Jean-David: I've two elements here of a Wollensak, Series IIIa, Ex WA, F/12.5 8x10. (Reading directly around the lens.) No shutter. Does anyone have specs for the 'tween the lens mounting? I do have several shutters ~#3 to use. Just never felt the need to go there. I've no idea if this is worth a thing. What ya all think? Dog? Saint? I use a Goerz ~180mm for 8x10 when I manage to shoot 8x10) and am fairly happy with it. Is the Wollensak worth a darn to mount up? jj |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Schneider 210mm Angulon.
I just hate scrolling all the way down on a 1600x1200 screen to see a reply...
erie John J wrote: (sorry for top-posting, but it works better for Erie.) Yes, it does fit a #3. Found a broken one and it screwed right in. Whether the spacing is right or not - I'll find out! j erie patsellis wrote: They might be worth a little effort, depends on if you have a 159mm or thereabouts for the 8x10. Most likely the should screw right into a Betax/Alphax shutter, likely a #3 what diameter and approx. pitch are the threads? erie John J wrote: Jean-David Beyer wrote: I usually do not take lenses apart. Jean-David: I've two elements here of a Wollensak, Series IIIa, Ex WA, F/12.5 8x10. (Reading directly around the lens.) No shutter. Does anyone have specs for the 'tween the lens mounting? I do have several shutters ~#3 to use. Just never felt the need to go there. I've no idea if this is worth a thing. What ya all think? Dog? Saint? I use a Goerz ~180mm for 8x10 when I manage to shoot 8x10) and am fairly happy with it. Is the Wollensak worth a darn to mount up? jj |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Schneider 210mm Angulon.
erie patsellis wrote:
I just hate scrolling all the way down on a 1600x1200 screen to see a reply... That can be easily resolved when someone who is responding deletes all the message to which (s)he is responding except for the relevant part(s). -- .~. Jean-David Beyer Registered Linux User 85642. /V\ PGP-Key: 9A2FC99A Registered Machine 241939. /( )\ Shrewsbury, New Jersey http://counter.li.org ^^-^^ 16:25:01 up 4 days, 9:41, 3 users, load average: 4.72, 4.38, 4.30 |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Schneider 210mm Angulon.
No problem. Information is most important. I've been on a network
messaging system of sone kind sice 1976. My skin is thick to whiners and you ain't one of 'em,. Thanks for the info, Erie. You da man! erie patsellis wrote: I just hate scrolling all the way down on a 1600x1200 screen to see a reply... erie John J wrote: (sorry for top-posting, but it works better for Erie.) Yes, it does fit a #3. Found a broken one and it screwed right in. Whether the spacing is right or not - I'll find out! j erie patsellis wrote: They might be worth a little effort, depends on if you have a 159mm or thereabouts for the 8x10. Most likely the should screw right into a Betax/Alphax shutter, likely a #3 what diameter and approx. pitch are the threads? erie John J wrote: Jean-David Beyer wrote: I usually do not take lenses apart. Jean-David: I've two elements here of a Wollensak, Series IIIa, Ex WA, F/12.5 8x10. (Reading directly around the lens.) No shutter. Does anyone have specs for the 'tween the lens mounting? I do have several shutters ~#3 to use. Just never felt the need to go there. I've no idea if this is worth a thing. What ya all think? Dog? Saint? I use a Goerz ~180mm for 8x10 when I manage to shoot 8x10) and am fairly happy with it. Is the Wollensak worth a darn to mount up? jj |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Schneider 210mm Angulon.
In article ,
John J wrote: No problem. Information is most important. I've been on a network messaging system of sone kind sice 1976. My skin is thick to whiners and you ain't one of 'em,. So, you know, if you walk into a restaurant, and everyone is talking quietly, you probably have good enough manners to not start shouting even if that's what you'd do in a loud bar. Good manners for *this* "network messaging system" require that you not top-post, and that you edit quoted material for relevance and respond inline and at the bottom -- not the top. Please exhibit good manners when posting to Usenet henceforth, and remember that what constitutes good manners depends on where you happen to be and what conventions the people who were there before you happened to establish. Thanks! -- Thor Lancelot Simon "Even experienced UNIX users occasionally enter rm *.* at the UNIX prompt only to realize too late that they have removed the wrong segment of the directory structure." - Microsoft WSS whitepaper |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Schneider 210mm Angulon.
Thor Lancelot Simon wrote:
In article , John J wrote: No problem. Information is most important. I've been on a network messaging system of sone kind sice 1976. My skin is thick to whiners and you ain't one of 'em,. So, you know, if you walk into a restaurant, and everyone is talking quietly, you probably have good enough manners to not start shouting even if that's what you'd do in a loud bar. Did I mess up somewhere? Good manners for *this* "network messaging system" require that you not top-post, and that you edit quoted material for relevance and respond inline and at the bottom -- not the top. Just for the record, I top-posted when I saw the author was Erie. I know Erie, and was trying to be accommodating to his top-post. Please exhibit good manners when posting to Usenet henceforth, and remember that what constitutes good manners depends on where you happen to be and what conventions the people who were there before you happened to establish. Frankly, I do not believe I earned such a condescending message. I will look back to find if I did, indeed, mess up somewhere other than the one top-post to Erie. As I wrote first, the good information I've found here for a very long time is very much appreciated, and I hope I have contributed with my admittedly modest LF expertise. best, john |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Schneider 210mm Angulon.
On 3/21/2009 10:57 AM John J spake thus:
Thor Lancelot Simon wrote: In article , John J wrote: No problem. Information is most important. I've been on a network messaging system of sone kind sice 1976. My skin is thick to whiners and you ain't one of 'em,. So, you know, if you walk into a restaurant, and everyone is talking quietly, you probably have good enough manners to not start shouting even if that's what you'd do in a loud bar. Did I mess up somewhere? Good manners for *this* "network messaging system" require that you not top-post, and that you edit quoted material for relevance and respond inline and at the bottom -- not the top. Just for the record, I top-posted when I saw the author was Erie. I know Erie, and was trying to be accommodating to his top-post. Why? You know what he did was wrong. You normally bottom-post yourself: why bend over to accommodate someone breaking protocol? -- Made From Pears: Pretty good chance that the product is at least mostly pears. Made With Pears: Pretty good chance that pears will be detectable in the product. Contains Pears: One pear seed per multiple tons of product. (with apologies to Dorothy L. Sayers) |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Schneider 210mm Angulon.
David Nebenzahl wrote:
Just for the record, I top-posted when I saw the author was Erie. I know Erie, and was trying to be accommodating to his top-post. Why? You know what he did was wrong. You normally bottom-post yourself: why bend over to accommodate someone breaking protocol? OK, I messed up. Let's not let this thread become unpleasant. Today is our first warm day, snow is melting and I'm going to shoot some 8x10. Life is good. j |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Schneider 121mm Super Angulon | John | Large Format Photography Equipment | 18 | November 12th 04 05:08 AM |
FA: Beautiful Schneider Super Angulon 90/8 for 4x5 | Douglas Tourtelot | Large Format Equipment For Sale | 0 | January 14th 04 03:54 PM |
FS: Schneider 8/90 Super Angulon | Douglas Tourtelot | Large Format Equipment For Sale | 1 | January 10th 04 02:09 AM |
FS: 90mm 6.8 Schneider Angulon | DKFletcher | Large Format Equipment For Sale | 0 | July 12th 03 02:49 AM |
FS: 90mm 6.8 Schneider Angulon | DKFletcher | General Equipment For Sale | 0 | July 12th 03 02:48 AM |