A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

To FF or not to FF...



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old July 11th 17, 06:18 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
nospam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24,165
Default To FF or not to FF...

In article , PeterN
wrote:

I donâ??t think he was using the GWB/Who delivery.


Why is the second word in your reply so screwed up?

because you're using a ****ty newsreader.

It wasn't screwed up for me. There is obviously some confusion over
fonts.

it's not fonts. it's unicode support.

Yep, that's what I really meant. But see
https://www.webmasterworld.com/forum21/5037.htm


that's 15 years old, no longer relevant and nothing more than a bunch
of uninformed idiots.


You must be equally uninformed. Otherwise, being the nice helpful person
you really are, you would have posted something positive.


i don't see anything positive from you.
  #52  
Old July 11th 17, 07:35 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
PeterN[_6_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,254
Default To FF or not to FF...

On 7/11/2017 1:18 PM, nospam wrote:
In article , PeterN
wrote:

I donâ??t think he was using the GWB/Who delivery.


Why is the second word in your reply so screwed up?

because you're using a ****ty newsreader.

It wasn't screwed up for me. There is obviously some confusion over
fonts.

it's not fonts. it's unicode support.

Yep, that's what I really meant. But see
https://www.webmasterworld.com/forum21/5037.htm

that's 15 years old, no longer relevant and nothing more than a bunch
of uninformed idiots.


You must be equally uninformed. Otherwise, being the nice helpful person
you really are, you would have posted something positive.


i don't see anything positive from you.


What I do, or don't do is irrelevant. The topic is your lack of
constructive contributions.


--
PeterN
  #53  
Old July 11th 17, 07:39 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
nospam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24,165
Default To FF or not to FF...

In article , PeterN
wrote:



You must be equally uninformed. Otherwise, being the nice helpful person
you really are, you would have posted something positive.


i don't see anything positive from you.


What I do, or don't do is irrelevant.


it's exactly relevant.

The topic is your lack of
constructive contributions.


set an example.

put another way, i'm more helpful that you are.
  #54  
Old July 11th 17, 07:52 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
PeterN[_6_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,254
Default To FF or not to FF...

On 7/11/2017 2:39 PM, nospam wrote:
In article , PeterN
wrote:



You must be equally uninformed. Otherwise, being the nice helpful person
you really are, you would have posted something positive.

i don't see anything positive from you.


What I do, or don't do is irrelevant.


it's exactly relevant.

The topic is your lack of
constructive contributions.


set an example.

put another way, i'm more helpful that you are.


I'm sure your mother would say that. Now back to the topic. You wiggle
more than our President.


--
PeterN
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.