If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Orchid Shots
On 5/11/2017 1:44 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2017-05-11 17:35:48 +0000, PeterN said: On 5/11/2017 1:02 PM, Savageduck wrote: On 2017-05-11 16:49:02 +0000, PeterN said: On 3/15/2017 8:27 PM, Savageduck wrote: This orchid has taken 2 years to bloom again and is emerging by the hour. The first two shots are LR processed RAW, and the third is a SOOC JPEG. X-E2 +18-55mm: https://www.dropbox.com/s/pb4uycmw1685tu4/DSF4329.jpg https://www.dropbox.com/s/wusbkmsxl320wbx/DSF4328.jpg https://www.dropbox.com/s/z6iiw7wvfhzbhy4/DSCF4331.jpg They are nice shots, bout there is something that bothers me about the SOOC JPEG. ...er, OK. Let us know when you can pin point just what it is that bothers you about that photo. The white areas in the background keep drawing my eye away from the flower. OK. However, with the background OoF that shouldnt be an issue. The empty branch contributes nothing to the image, and diminishes the importance of the subject. What empty branch? There is only the stem with the blossom and buds. Sorry Duck, it just doesn't look like a clean image that I would want to hang on my wall. That's OK. I was just documenting the emerging blossoms. It was never intended to be "wall worthy" fine art. shat is also a purpose of photography. -- PeterN |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Orchid Shots
On 2017-05-11 20:35:08 +0000, PeterN said:
On 5/11/2017 1:44 PM, Savageduck wrote: On 2017-05-11 17:35:48 +0000, PeterN said: On 5/11/2017 1:02 PM, Savageduck wrote: On 2017-05-11 16:49:02 +0000, PeterN said: On 3/15/2017 8:27 PM, Savageduck wrote: This orchid has taken 2 years to bloom again and is emerging by the hour. The first two shots are LR processed RAW, and the third is a SOOC JPEG. X-E2 +18-55mm: https://www.dropbox.com/s/pb4uycmw1685tu4/DSF4329.jpg https://www.dropbox.com/s/wusbkmsxl320wbx/DSF4328.jpg https://www.dropbox.com/s/z6iiw7wvfhzbhy4/DSCF4331.jpg They are nice shots, bout there is something that bothers me about the SOOC JPEG. ...er, OK. Let us know when you can pin point just what it is that bothers you about that photo. The white areas in the background keep drawing my eye away from the flower. OK. However, with the background OoF that shouldnt be an issue. The empty branch contributes nothing to the image, and diminishes the importance of the subject. What empty branch? There is only the stem with the blossom and buds. Sorry Duck, it just doesn't look like a clean image that I would want to hang on my wall. That's OK. I was just documenting the emerging blossoms. It was never intended to be "wall worthy" fine art. shat is also a purpose of photography. ??? -- Regards, Savageduck |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Orchid Shots
On 5/11/2017 5:00 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2017-05-11 20:35:08 +0000, PeterN said: On 5/11/2017 1:44 PM, Savageduck wrote: On 2017-05-11 17:35:48 +0000, PeterN said: On 5/11/2017 1:02 PM, Savageduck wrote: On 2017-05-11 16:49:02 +0000, PeterN said: On 3/15/2017 8:27 PM, Savageduck wrote: This orchid has taken 2 years to bloom again and is emerging by the hour. The first two shots are LR processed RAW, and the third is a SOOC JPEG. X-E2 +18-55mm: https://www.dropbox.com/s/pb4uycmw1685tu4/DSF4329.jpg https://www.dropbox.com/s/wusbkmsxl320wbx/DSF4328.jpg https://www.dropbox.com/s/z6iiw7wvfhzbhy4/DSCF4331.jpg They are nice shots, bout there is something that bothers me about the SOOC JPEG. ...er, OK. Let us know when you can pin point just what it is that bothers you about that photo. The white areas in the background keep drawing my eye away from the flower. OK. However, with the background OoF that shouldnt be an issue. The empty branch contributes nothing to the image, and diminishes the importance of the subject. What empty branch? There is only the stem with the blossom and buds. Sorry Duck, it just doesn't look like a clean image that I would want to hang on my wall. That's OK. I was just documenting the emerging blossoms. It was never intended to be "wall worthy" fine art. shat is also a purpose of photography. ??? Documentation of an event, or series of events is also a purpose of photography. Yeah! I had an obvious typo. -- PeterN |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Orchid Shots
In article ,
Whisky-dave wrote: Well perhaps he means shat photography aka **** photogrphy from the past. Here in the UK shat is the past tense of ****, so while I find it ammuing I doubt that's what was meant but I can work out what he meant because functionsing human brains can work it out, I think he meant to type "that" Not that I know anyfing about tpyos ;-) Don't be modest. You are obviously using a custom typo generator... -- teleportation kills |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Many Shots? | Better Info[_6_] | Digital Photography | 0 | June 30th 10 01:29 PM |
Canon A570IS, 200 shots on eneloop, 10 shots on Alkaline | SMS | Digital Photography | 26 | July 18th 08 04:37 AM |
A few shots with the FZ7 | J. Clarke | Digital ZLR Cameras | 0 | May 19th 06 11:58 AM |
White Orchid | Barry L. Wallis | Digital Photography | 24 | April 6th 06 02:57 PM |