Digital manipulation is unacceptabe, at least in ...

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/24/science/24frau.html

I'd put that test against ANY image claiming to be not digital.
That would probably eliminate 80% of photo.net crap

ah2 spake thus:

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/24/science/24frau.html

I'd put that test against ANY image claiming to be not digital.
That would probably eliminate 80% of photo.net crap

Can you do us a flavor and repost the article here? I get the "you must
be a registered member of NYTimes.com" roadblock. (Yeah, like *that's*
gonna happen!)


--
The only reason corrupt Republicans rule the roost in Washington
is because the corrupt Democrats can't muster any viable opposition.

"David Nebenzahl" wrote in message
.com...

Can you do us a flavor and repost the article here? I get the "you must be
a registered member of NYTimes.com" roadblock. (Yeah, like *that's* gonna
happen!)

Can''t without violating copyright. Sorry.

But you can use bugmenot.com

Hit the URL: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/24/science/24frau.html

bugmenot.com says to try:
Username kissit
Password baby6

On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:32:41 -0600, "ah2" wrote:

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/24/science/24frau.html

I'd put that test against ANY image claiming to be not digital.
That would probably eliminate 80% of photo.net crap


I don't understand. Is there a prohibition against
digital captures being shown on photo.net?

Or are people falsely claiming "this photo is
not a digital capture" when it is?

And if the latter, how do you know?


rafe b
www.terrapinphoto.com

ah2 spake thus:

"David Nebenzahl" wrote in message
.com...

Can you do us a flavor and repost the article here? I get the "you
must be a registered member of NYTimes.com" roadblock. (Yeah, like
*that's* gonna happen!)

Can''t without violating copyright. Sorry.

But you can use bugmenot.com

Hit the URL: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/24/science/24frau.html

bugmenot.com says to try:
Username kissit
Password baby6

Kewl! You are forgiven many of your trespasses, and I take back any
number of bad things I may have said about you.


--
The only reason corrupt Republicans rule the roost in Washington
is because the corrupt Democrats can't muster any viable opposition.

"David Nebenzahl" wrote in message
.com...
ah2 spake thus:

Kewl! You are forgiven many of your trespasses, and I take back any number
of bad things I may have said about you.

Oh no you don't! I have a reputation to maintain.

In article ,
"ah2" wrote:

"David Nebenzahl" wrote in message
.com...
ah2 spake thus:

Kewl! You are forgiven many of your trespasses, and I take back any number
of bad things I may have said about you.

Oh no you don't! I have a reputation to maintain.
(Idiot)
--
"To announce that there must be no criticism of the President,
or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong,
is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable
to the American public."--Theodore Roosevelt, May 7, 1918

greg_____photo(dot)com

G- Blank spake thus:

In article ,
"ah2" wrote:

"David Nebenzahl" wrote in message
.com...

ah2 spake thus:

Kewl! You are forgiven many of your trespasses, and I take back
any number of bad things I may have said about you.

Oh no you don't! I have a reputation to maintain.

(Idiot)

No, no, no, Greggy, that's *your* part. We already went over this. Don't
you remember--we handed them out in class today. Stafford's the Snark,
UC's the Misanthrope (sharing the role with the Nebster), and you get to
play the Idiot.


--
The only reason corrupt Republicans rule the roost in Washington
is because the corrupt Democrats can't muster any viable opposition.

ah2 wrote:

"David Nebenzahl" wrote in message
.com...
ah2 spake thus:

Kewl! You are forgiven many of your trespasses, and I take back any number
of bad things I may have said about you.

Oh no you don't! I have a reputation to maintain.

You and Nebenzahl both...