A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

SLRs banned at Olympics



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 9th 08, 04:13 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
SMS
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,312
Default SLRs banned at Olympics

"http://www.geeksugar.com/1842850"

I guess there's finally an advantage to a P&S!
  #2  
Old August 9th 08, 07:42 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
Paul Bartram
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 259
Default SLRs banned at Olympics


"SMS" wrote

"http://www.geeksugar.com/1842850"


I guess there's finally an advantage to a P&S!


What an authoritative website *that* is! If you go to the British Journal of
Photography site http://www.bjphoto.co.uk/public/show...ml?page=808276
it makes it a little clearer - the Chinese are talking about visitors
(spectators) rather than accredited photographers in the media areas. I
guess that makes sense - who, having paid megabucks for a ticket, wants some
dweeb in the row behind poking a 400mm lens over your shoulder and going
calunk calunk calunk all through the event, especially if it's something
quiet like bowls or archery. Guess people will have to settle for firing
their little built-in flashes at a stadium an industrial strobe wouldn't
have any effect on!

See also http://www.sportsjournalists.co.uk/blog/?p=1363 wherein President
Bush gets the hard word on filming. HM the Queen is well known for packing a
Leica, wonder who the lucky minion is that has to say "Sorry madam, no
allowed your camera here..." (Off with his head!)

Paul



  #3  
Old August 9th 08, 08:12 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
Blinky the Shark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 827
Default SLRs banned at Olympics

Paul Bartram wrote:


"SMS" wrote

"http://www.geeksugar.com/1842850"


I guess there's finally an advantage to a P&S!


What an authoritative website *that* is! If you go to the British Journal of
Photography site http://www.bjphoto.co.uk/public/show...ml?page=808276
it makes it a little clearer - the Chinese are talking about visitors
(spectators) rather than accredited photographers in the media areas. I
guess that makes sense - who, having paid megabucks for a ticket, wants some
dweeb in the row behind poking a 400mm lens over your shoulder and going
calunk calunk calunk all through the event, especially if it's something
quiet like bowls or archery. Guess people will have to settle for firing
their little built-in flashes at a stadium an industrial strobe wouldn't
have any effect on!


My first thought was that they didn't want to offer the spectators the
chance to make pro-sports-shooter-quality images at their venues. Then,
above my head, appeared a bright light bulb, and the light bulb spake,
and what it said was, "Yeah, the Chinese worrying about copyrights. El oh
el."


--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org
Need a new news feed? http://blinkynet.net/comp/newfeed.html

  #4  
Old August 9th 08, 10:07 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
Chris H
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,283
Default SLRs banned at Olympics

In message , Paul
Bartram writes

"SMS" wrote

"http://www.geeksugar.com/1842850"


I guess there's finally an advantage to a P&S!


What an authoritative website *that* is! If you go to the British Journal of
Photography site http://www.bjphoto.co.uk/public/show...ml?page=808276
it makes it a little clearer - the Chinese are talking about visitors
(spectators) rather than accredited photographers in the media areas.


Just like ANY music concert. (Usually NO photos at all) and many other
events.

I expect that this is probably something the pro photographers
welcome... Event photography, like prostitution, can be ruined by
amateurs getting into he market :-)

--
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/



  #5  
Old August 9th 08, 12:01 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Cynicor[_6_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 191
Default SLRs banned at Olympics

Chris H wrote:
Paul Bartram writes
"SMS" wrote

"http://www.geeksugar.com/1842850"


I guess there's finally an advantage to a P&S!


What an authoritative website *that* is! If you go to the British
Journal of Photography site
http://www.bjphoto.co.uk/public/show...ml?page=808276
it makes it a little clearer - the Chinese are talking about visitors
(spectators) rather than accredited photographers in the media areas.


Just like ANY music concert. (Usually NO photos at all) and many other
events.


Not at all. I've been welcomed into many a concert with SLR in tow. I
shot four bands just this past Thursday. http://trupin.smugmug.com/music

They're usually stricter at seated concert venues than at clubs.

I expect that this is probably something the pro photographers
welcome... Event photography, like prostitution, can be ruined by
amateurs getting into he market :-)


  #6  
Old August 9th 08, 12:31 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Roy G[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 208
Default SLRs banned at Olympics


"Paul Bartram" p.bartram AT OR NEAR mysoul.com.au wrote in message
...

HM the Queen is well known for packing a
Leica, wonder who the lucky minion is that has to say "Sorry madam, no
allowed your camera here..." (Off with his head!)

Paul


No Problem for Lizzie, she uses a Leica "M" not an SLR, and that is classed
as a Compact.

Roy G


  #7  
Old August 9th 08, 02:16 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Chris H
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,283
Default SLRs banned at Olympics

In message , Roy G
writes

"Paul Bartram" p.bartram AT OR NEAR mysoul.com.au wrote in message
...

HM the Queen is well known for packing a
Leica, wonder who the lucky minion is that has to say "Sorry madam, no
allowed your camera here..." (Off with his head!)

Paul


No Problem for Lizzie, she uses a Leica "M" not an SLR, and that is classed
as a Compact.


Besides she usually has several dozen pro's in tow along with a couple
of TV crews... I suspects here people will request any pictures or video
they want
--
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
\/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/
\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/



  #8  
Old August 9th 08, 02:34 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Ron Hunter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,064
Default SLRs banned at Olympics

Chris H wrote:
In message , Paul
Bartram writes

"SMS" wrote

"http://www.geeksugar.com/1842850"


I guess there's finally an advantage to a P&S!


What an authoritative website *that* is! If you go to the British
Journal of
Photography site
http://www.bjphoto.co.uk/public/show...ml?page=808276
it makes it a little clearer - the Chinese are talking about visitors
(spectators) rather than accredited photographers in the media areas.


Just like ANY music concert. (Usually NO photos at all) and many other
events.

I expect that this is probably something the pro photographers
welcome... Event photography, like prostitution, can be ruined by
amateurs getting into he market :-)

You mean their profit can be eroded. That's true, and rightly so.
  #9  
Old August 9th 08, 02:35 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Ron Hunter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,064
Default SLRs banned at Olympics

Cynicor wrote:
Chris H wrote:
Paul Bartram writes
"SMS" wrote

"http://www.geeksugar.com/1842850"

I guess there's finally an advantage to a P&S!

What an authoritative website *that* is! If you go to the British
Journal of Photography site
http://www.bjphoto.co.uk/public/show...ml?page=808276
it makes it a little clearer - the Chinese are talking about visitors
(spectators) rather than accredited photographers in the media areas.


Just like ANY music concert. (Usually NO photos at all) and many
other events.


Not at all. I've been welcomed into many a concert with SLR in tow. I
shot four bands just this past Thursday. http://trupin.smugmug.com/music

They're usually stricter at seated concert venues than at clubs.

I expect that this is probably something the pro photographers
welcome... Event photography, like prostitution, can be ruined by
amateurs getting into he market :-)


Pity you didn't HIT any of them.
Oh, you mean with a camera? Never mind.

GRIN.
  #10  
Old August 9th 08, 04:34 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
irwell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 694
Default SLRs banned at Olympics

On Sat, 9 Aug 2008 14:16:43 +0100, Chris H wrote:

In message , Roy G
writes

"Paul Bartram" p.bartram AT OR NEAR mysoul.com.au wrote in message
...

HM the Queen is well known for packing a
Leica, wonder who the lucky minion is that has to say "Sorry madam, no
allowed your camera here..." (Off with his head!)

Paul


No Problem for Lizzie, she uses a Leica "M" not an SLR, and that is classed
as a Compact.


Besides she usually has several dozen pro's in tow along with a couple
of TV crews... I suspects here people will request any pictures or video
they want


Philip used to have a Hasselblad amongst his other toys like
the Bluebottle racing yatch, his team of shire horses, his Ferrari etc.
Tough life.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Olympics National Park (WA) [email protected] Photographing Nature 1 June 19th 07 02:17 AM
Make Millions with PPC Profits so good they should be BANNED for being so EVIL.... Seo Optimizing Software Digital Photography 0 April 22nd 07 07:51 PM
Cameras banned from Carlsbad Caverns during bat flights y_p_w Digital Photography 47 April 18th 06 12:36 AM
Cameras banned from Carlsbad Caverns Colyn 35mm Photo Equipment 4 April 14th 06 12:56 AM
People who top post should be banned from Usenet [email protected] Film & Labs 58 April 10th 04 08:36 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.