If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
One more quickie- Personal Experiences of Fuji Neopan 1600 wanted.
I have read epinions, photographyreview, etc opinions of this film and
am wondering who's using it and *how* they're using it. I've been hearing a lot of people shoot this a stop down and i'm also interested in peoples *real* experiences with the latitude of the film. I've been shooting tmz3200 forever and i've been hearing that 3200 @ 1600 is hugely more responsive than the neopan 1600. But seeing that these are as far as I know the fast commercial bw films available I'd really interested in seeing any alternatives. Thanks much, sd |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
fotoobscura wrote:
I have read epinions, photographyreview, etc opinions of this film and am wondering who's using it and *how* they're using it. I've been hearing a lot of people shoot this a stop down and i'm also interested in peoples *real* experiences with the latitude of the film. I've been shooting tmz3200 forever and i've been hearing that 3200 @ 1600 is hugely more responsive than the neopan 1600. But seeing that these are as far as I know the fast commercial bw films available I'd really interested in seeing any alternatives. Thanks much, sd There is also Ilford Delta 3200. After trying the Kodak and Ilford fast B/W choices, I found I got better results with the Ilford film, but only using Ilford developer. To get to 1600 ISO, the best solution I have found so far is to use Kodak TMX 400, then shoot and develop as an ISO 1600 film. If you really want ISO 1600, you might give that a try as well, or try some of the Ilford. Ciao! Gordon Moat A G Studio http://www.allgstudio.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
fotoobscura wrote:
I have read epinions, photographyreview, etc opinions of this film and am wondering who's using it and *how* they're using it. I've been hearing a lot of people shoot this a stop down and i'm also interested in peoples *real* experiences with the latitude of the film. I've been shooting tmz3200 forever and i've been hearing that 3200 @ 1600 is hugely more responsive than the neopan 1600. But seeing that these are as far as I know the fast commercial bw films available I'd really interested in seeing any alternatives. Thanks much, sd There is also Ilford Delta 3200. After trying the Kodak and Ilford fast B/W choices, I found I got better results with the Ilford film, but only using Ilford developer. To get to 1600 ISO, the best solution I have found so far is to use Kodak TMX 400, then shoot and develop as an ISO 1600 film. If you really want ISO 1600, you might give that a try as well, or try some of the Ilford. Ciao! Gordon Moat A G Studio http://www.allgstudio.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
fotoobscura wrote: I have read epinions, photographyreview, etc opinions of this film and am wondering who's using it and *how* they're using it. I've been hearing a lot of people shoot this a stop down and i'm also interested in peoples *real* experiences with the latitude of the film. I've been shooting tmz3200 forever and i've been hearing that 3200 @ 1600 is hugely more responsive than the neopan 1600. But seeing that these are as far as I know the fast commercial bw films available I'd really interested in seeing any alternatives. Thanks much, sd I have tested all of the very fast films: Neopan 1600 (650-800), T-Max P3200 (800-1000), and Delta 3200 (800-1000). NONE is faster than 1000. NONE! The Ilford is by far the grainiest. The Kodak is in between, and the Fuji is the finest-grained of them all. I use the Neopan. It's by far the best. I shoot it at 650, and develop it in Acutol. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
fotoobscura wrote: I have read epinions, photographyreview, etc opinions of this film and am wondering who's using it and *how* they're using it. I've been hearing a lot of people shoot this a stop down and i'm also interested in peoples *real* experiences with the latitude of the film. I've been shooting tmz3200 forever and i've been hearing that 3200 @ 1600 is hugely more responsive than the neopan 1600. But seeing that these are as far as I know the fast commercial bw films available I'd really interested in seeing any alternatives. Thanks much, sd I have tested all of the very fast films: Neopan 1600 (650-800), T-Max P3200 (800-1000), and Delta 3200 (800-1000). NONE is faster than 1000. NONE! The Ilford is by far the grainiest. The Kodak is in between, and the Fuji is the finest-grained of them all. I use the Neopan. It's by far the best. I shoot it at 650, and develop it in Acutol. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Guess i'll go back to 3200 in rod 1:25...always yielded the best
results for me. Thanks for the info..and research.. Cheers, sd |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
fotoobscura wrote: Guess i'll go back to 3200 in rod 1:25...always yielded the best results for me. Thanks for the info..and research.. Cheers, sd HUH????? Rodinal is a speed-LOSING developer. You're not getting more than 800 with that film, TOPS! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
plonk, as usual for this guy.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
fotoobscura wrote: plonk, as usual for this guy. Ignorance rules the universe, as usual...... The speed of this film is 650, no more! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fuji S5100 or Fuji e550? | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 6 | March 6th 05 09:01 AM |
Sony DSC F150 vs Fuji finepix F810 | Gnekker | Digital Photography | 1 | December 17th 04 02:44 AM |
Canon EOS D10 vs. Fuji S2: Opinions? | David Sleeter | Digital Photography | 7 | July 23rd 04 12:25 AM |
Is Fuji Reala 100 a good choice for floral macros? | Matt Clara | 35mm Photo Equipment | 7 | July 22nd 04 04:51 PM |
FS- FUJI GX 680 with 4 lenses!!! | B. Nadezdic | Medium Format Equipment For Sale | 0 | December 5th 03 02:03 AM |