If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Adox ADX?
Jan T wrote: well, as it was a direct reply to your reply, you of course, UC! "UC" schreef in bericht oups.com... To whom are you addressing this question? Jan T wrote: Do you see any resemblance with FX-50...? I don't have any idea... |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Adox ADX?
UC wrote:
Jan T wrote: well, as it was a direct reply to your reply, you of course, UC! "UC" schreef in bericht groups.com... To whom are you addressing this question? Jan T wrote: Do you see any resemblance with FX-50...? I don't have any idea... For what it's worth, I developed a few films at the weekend in this. The negs look pretty good although I haven't had a chance to properly scan them. I'm going by how they look through a loupe. Matt |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Adox ADX?
Scan? Loupe? Why not print them? I'm above all interested in how it prints
;-) | For what it's worth, I developed a few films at the weekend in this. | | The negs look pretty good although I haven't had a chance to properly | scan them. I'm going by how they look through a loupe. | | Matt |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Adox ADX?
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:07:38 +0100, "Jan T"
wrote: Scan? Loupe? Why not print them? I'm above all interested in how it prints ;-) I don't have space for an enlarger. It's simply not possible in my rented flat to a) make a room properly light tight and b) find somewhere to store the enlarger. Enlargers are cheaply and easily available these days so if I had the space I'd definitely have one, but I don't. So I compromise by shooting film and scanning. I pay for proper prints of particularly good negatives but otherwise make do with inkjet prints from film negs. The stored negs can be printed when I finally sort out an enlarger. I will, soon, have occasional access to a darkroom through work so I will be optically printing more often. If I get a chance I'll give some feedback on the ADX developer. Matt | For what it's worth, I developed a few films at the weekend in this. | | The negs look pretty good although I haven't had a chance to properly | scan them. I'm going by how they look through a loupe. | | Matt |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Adox ADX?
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006 08:28:37 +0000, Matt
wrote: I don't have space for an enlarger. It's simply not possible in my rented flat to a) make a room properly light tight and b) find somewhere to store the enlarger. Enlargers are cheaply and easily available these days so if I had the space I'd definitely have one, but I don't. So I compromise by shooting film and scanning. I pay for proper prints of particularly good negatives but otherwise make do with inkjet prints from film negs. The stored negs can be printed when I finally sort out an enlarger. I will, soon, have occasional access to a darkroom through work so I will be optically printing more often. If I get a chance I'll give some feedback on the ADX developer. Matt You don't even have room for a small enlarger such as a Durst M305 ? I mean the baseboard is only 14X16". Add a decent 50mm lens and a Nova slot system and you can make 8X10's in an area only about 18X36" with an area for a singly tray to catch the prints as you bring them out of the fixer. Now light problem, that can sure be a challenge ! JD |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pan F + soon te be history ??? | Robert Van Brustum | In The Darkroom | 104 | October 17th 04 12:15 AM |
Adox Bluefire? | Michael A. Covington | Film & Labs | 2 | September 23rd 04 03:40 PM |
Adox Bluefire | David Foy | Film & Labs | 6 | October 19th 03 12:29 AM |