If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Image Stabilization
Can someone tell me, or give me a link to a discussion of, which type
of image stabilization is better; optical or digital? I'm trying to get up to speed on all the changes in the technology in the 4 years since i bought my last camera. thanks |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Image Stabilization
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 20:14:27 -0400, Raoul wrote:
Can someone tell me, or give me a link to a discussion of, which type of image stabilization is better; optical or digital? I'm trying to get up to speed on all the changes in the technology in the 4 years since i bought my last camera. Subscribe to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems if you haven't already done so and start retrieving messages from the following date. While the message ID is compatible with your version of Agent, I've found that the messages from googlegroups don't always download. Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems Subject: Image stabilization - which works better, sensor or lens shift? Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 06:04:16 -0700 Message-ID: .com BTW, did you really mean "digital" image stabilization? I think that that's generally used for video cameras, whereas digital still cameras normally use the two types mentioned in the Subject line. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Image Stabilization
"Raoul" wrote in message
... Can someone tell me, or give me a link to a discussion of, which type of image stabilization is better; optical or digital? I'm trying to get up to speed on all the changes in the technology in the 4 years since i bought my last camera. thanks Don't need a link. Optical is better. Digital simply ups the ISO on the camera. It fakes it, just like Digital Zoom fakes optical zoom. Do not decided on a camera because it has Digital Image Stabilization. If it isn't in the lens or on the sensor it is **** plain and simple. Somebody! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Image Stabilization
"Somebody" wrote in message ... "Raoul" wrote in message ... Can someone tell me, or give me a link to a discussion of, which type of image stabilization is better; optical or digital? I'm trying to get up to speed on all the changes in the technology in the 4 years since i bought my last camera. thanks Don't need a link. Optical is better. Digital simply ups the ISO on the camera. It fakes it, just like Digital Zoom fakes optical zoom. Do not decided on a camera because it has Digital Image Stabilization. If it isn't in the lens or on the sensor it is **** plain and simple. Somebody! Got some links to some testing on this? Thanks |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Image Stabilization
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Image Stabilization
Raoul wrote:
Can someone tell me, or give me a link to a discussion of, which type of image stabilization is better; optical or digital? This one is a no brainer. Digital stabilization takes a series of blurry images and tries to recover something from them, or even worse just increases the ASA and shutter speed and introduces digital noise. It is common on movie cameras. In still cameras it is mainly advertising hype. Optical stabilization prevents blurry images in the first place. It is by far the best and found on your better cameras. It comes in two forms, in-the-lens and at-the-sensor. I have at-the-sensor and it is great because it will work with any lens. I have a 35 mm to 420 mm (equiv) zoom and it works flawlessly. I used it on safari in Africa while shooting animal photos and didn't have one blurry photo. Purists like in-the-lens stabilization since in each lens the stabilization is optimized. The down sides are that it makes you older lenses obsolete, makes lenses heavier, and is very expensive. If you are using a zoom lens, then it really doesn't matter since the stabilization in-the-lens has the same compromises that the stabilization at-the-sensor has. The difference being that at-the-sensor is less expensive and more reliable. Typically either optical system will give you about 3 stops more range. -- Pardon my spam deterrent; send email to Cheers, Steve Henning in Reading, PA USA http://rhodyman.net |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Image Stabilization
On Aug 12, 5:55 pm, ASAAR wrote:
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 20:14:27 -0400, Raoul wrote: Can someone tell me, or give me a link to a discussion of, which type of image stabilization is better; optical or digital? I'm trying to get up to speed on all the changes in the technology in the 4 years since i bought my last camera. Subscribe to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems if you haven't already done so and start retrieving messages from the following date. While the message ID is compatible with your version of Agent, I've found that the messages from googlegroups don't always download. Newsgroups: rec.photo.digital.slr-systems Subject: Image stabilization - which works better, sensor or lens shift? Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2007 06:04:16 -0700 Message-ID: .com BTW, did you really mean "digital" image stabilization? I think that that's generally used for video cameras, whereas digital still cameras normally use the two types mentioned in the Subject line. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Image Stabilization
"Pete D" wrote in message
... "Somebody" wrote in message ... "Raoul" wrote in message ... Can someone tell me, or give me a link to a discussion of, which type of image stabilization is better; optical or digital? I'm trying to get up to speed on all the changes in the technology in the 4 years since i bought my last camera. thanks Don't need a link. Optical is better. Digital simply ups the ISO on the camera. It fakes it, just like Digital Zoom fakes optical zoom. Do not decided on a camera because it has Digital Image Stabilization. If it isn't in the lens or on the sensor it is **** plain and simple. Somebody! Got some links to some testing on this? Thanks Don't need testing on this. digital is faked. Only a moron would think that faked IS is anywhere close to being real optical IS. Somebody! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Image Stabilization
On Aug 13, 3:04 pm, "Somebody" wrote:
Don't need testing on this. digital is faked. Only a moron would think that faked IS is anywhere close to being real optical IS. I know that in camcorders the alternative digital is *not* faked. But in a camcorder the objective is different (cutting down of jiggling rather than cutting down of blur). I don't think the video cam electronic method would work for stills. But this may be the reason one might think it would work properly -- rather than because one is a moron. They may be camcorder users where the electronic version DOES really work, even if not as well as optical. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
image stabilization | jojoandsha | Digital Photography | 8 | December 17th 05 10:51 AM |
image stabilization | mo | Digital SLR Cameras | 2 | June 17th 05 02:26 PM |
image stabilization | cqdx | Digital Photography | 10 | January 11th 05 05:37 PM |
image stabilization | al-Farrob | Digital Photography | 15 | January 6th 05 05:15 PM |
Image Stabilization Lenses | rob | Photographing People | 8 | November 12th 04 04:05 AM |