PING: PeterN

On 7/9/2016 10:54 AM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2016-07-09 14:44:41 +0000, PeterN said:

On 7/8/2016 4:12 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2016-07-08 20:06:16 +0000, Savageduck
said:

I thought you might like to see what is possible with the new X-T2.

xt2+sample-33.jpg
xt2+sample-38.jpg
xt2+sample-43.jpg

Let's try again.

Third try never fails
To my eye, as a group they are ordinary portraits of birds. For
reasons stated below, I don't see some of them as well done as others.
I have also seen much better work from you.

http://tinyurl.com/z7re3sz

Nice image, as far as IQ goes the best of the bunch.

I thought so.

http://tinyurl.com/hcued9k

the gray neck feathers are not as sharp as I would like them.

Yup! You would have oversharpened to the point of damaging the images,
but that is the way you like them.


And on & on as if there is no such thing as a satisfied physic, a happy
medium.


http://tinyurl.com/zkety6r
Looks like taken at noon, see the small shadow directly under the
bird. White feathers look washed out, and the black feathers are
blocked. I won't even comment about the camera angle, as that is
artists choice.

I didn't think that was a particularly good shot just one where there
was decent IQ.


We can't really tell about the DR from that image.

To me it doesn't matter if a world renown bird expert took these. My
comments would be the same.




--
PeterN