PING: PeterN

I thought you might like to see what is possible with the new X-T2.

xt2+sample-33.jpg
xt2+sample-38.jpg
xt2+sample-43.jpg

--
Regards,

Savageduck

On 2016-07-08 20:06:16 +0000, Savageduck said:

I thought you might like to see what is possible with the new X-T2.

xt2+sample-33.jpg
xt2+sample-38.jpg
xt2+sample-43.jpg

Let's try again.
http://tinyurl.com/z7re3sz
http://tinyurl.com/hcued9k
http://tinyurl.com/zkety6r
--
Regards,

Savageduck

In article 2016070813061615557-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

I thought you might like to see what is possible with the new X-T2.

xt2+sample-33.jpg
xt2+sample-38.jpg
xt2+sample-43.jpg

you're missing a key part of the urls.

On 2016-07-08 20:12:14 +0000, nospam said:

In article 2016070813061615557-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

I thought you might like to see what is possible with the new X-T2.

xt2+sample-33.jpg
xt2+sample-38.jpg
xt2+sample-43.jpg

you're missing a key part of the urls.

fixed

--
Regards,

Savageduck

On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 13:12:09 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

On 2016-07-08 20:06:16 +0000, Savageduck said:

I thought you might like to see what is possible with the new X-T2.

xt2+sample-33.jpg
xt2+sample-38.jpg
xt2+sample-43.jpg

Let's try again.
http://tinyurl.com/z7re3sz
http://tinyurl.com/hcued9k

Is that a glass eye I see before me?

http://tinyurl.com/zkety6r
--

Regards,

Eric Stevens

On 2016-07-08 22:45:07 +0000, Eric Stevens said:

On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 13:12:09 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

On 2016-07-08 20:06:16 +0000, Savageduck said:

I thought you might like to see what is possible with the new X-T2.

xt2+sample-33.jpg
xt2+sample-38.jpg
xt2+sample-43.jpg

Let's try again.
http://tinyurl.com/z7re3sz
http://tinyurl.com/hcued9k

Is that a glass eye I see before me?

Nope. Just a good sharp image.

http://tinyurl.com/zkety6r


--
Regards,

Savageduck

On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 15:56:28 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

On 2016-07-08 22:45:07 +0000, Eric Stevens said:

On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 13:12:09 -0700, Savageduck
wrote:

On 2016-07-08 20:06:16 +0000, Savageduck said:

I thought you might like to see what is possible with the new X-T2.

xt2+sample-33.jpg
xt2+sample-38.jpg
xt2+sample-43.jpg

Let's try again.
http://tinyurl.com/z7re3sz
http://tinyurl.com/hcued9k

Is that a glass eye I see before me?

Nope. Just a good sharp image.

And a sharp reflection of the scenery on the surface of the eye. I
could make out palm trees but Firefox would not enlarge the image
sufficiently to enable me to see the photographer. How is that for a
tight crop?

http://tinyurl.com/zkety6r
--

Regards,

Eric Stevens

On 7/8/2016 4:12 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2016-07-08 20:06:16 +0000, Savageduck
said:

I thought you might like to see what is possible with the new X-T2.

xt2+sample-33.jpg
xt2+sample-38.jpg
xt2+sample-43.jpg

Let's try again.

Third try never fails
To my eye, as a group they are ordinary portraits of birds. For reasons
stated below, I don't see some of them as well done as others. I have
also seen much better work from you.

http://tinyurl.com/z7re3sz


Nice image, as far as IQ goes the best of the bunch.

http://tinyurl.com/hcued9k

the gray neck feathers are not as sharp as I would like them.

http://tinyurl.com/zkety6r
Looks like taken at noon, see the small shadow directly under the bird.
White feathers look washed out, and the black feathers are blocked. I
won't even comment about the camera angle, as that is artists choice.

To me it doesn't matter if a world renown bird expert took these. My
comments would be the same.



--
PeterN

On 2016-07-09 14:44:41 +0000, PeterN said:

On 7/8/2016 4:12 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2016-07-08 20:06:16 +0000, Savageduck
said:

I thought you might like to see what is possible with the new X-T2.

xt2+sample-33.jpg
xt2+sample-38.jpg
xt2+sample-43.jpg

Let's try again.

Third try never fails
To my eye, as a group they are ordinary portraits of birds. For reasons
stated below, I don't see some of them as well done as others. I have
also seen much better work from you.

http://tinyurl.com/z7re3sz

Nice image, as far as IQ goes the best of the bunch.

I thought so.

http://tinyurl.com/hcued9k

the gray neck feathers are not as sharp as I would like them.

Yup! You would have oversharpened to the point of damaging the images,
but that is the way you like them.

http://tinyurl.com/zkety6r
Looks like taken at noon, see the small shadow directly under the bird.
White feathers look washed out, and the black feathers are blocked. I
won't even comment about the camera angle, as that is artists choice.

I didn't think that was a particularly good shot just one where there
was decent IQ.

To me it doesn't matter if a world renown bird expert took these. My
comments would be the same.


--
Regards,

Savageduck

On 08/07/2016 21:06, Savageduck wrote:
I thought you might like to see what is possible with the new X-T2.

xt2+sample-33.jpg
xt2+sample-38.jpg
xt2+sample-43.jpg

So you bought one?

--
Cheers,
David
Web: http://www.satsignal.eu