If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Is photography art?
NJH wrote in message ... "William Graham" wrote in message news:FRNcb.586236$uu5.95963@sccrnsc04... NJH wrote in message ... There are a lot of people who think good art can be obtained through originality.....Unfortunately, it takes more than originality to be good....I would rather look at something beautiful that I've seen many times before, than look at something that is ugly, simply because I haven't seen it before. This weird, "taste" of mine manifests itself in the modern music.....I think most of it is gastly....I would much rather hear a symphony or opera that I've heard many times before than to sit through some of the catcalls that pass as modern music...... Hear, hear! And that's even without getting into so-called "rap music" (now there's an oxymoron if I ever heard one). Neil Yes, but I am fond of annoying my musical friends by saying that music includes 4 things......Beat, Words, Harmony, and Melody...And rap has three of them: Beat, words and melody, But modern jazz only has two: Beat, and harmony....So which is more like music? (I am obviously not a lover of modern jazz....) Heh. That's pretty interesting. I only occasionally like jazz (and not for very long at that), and rap I can't stand at all. I'm not sure I know what you mean by "modern jazz"--I don't really know anything about music in a technical sense, and don't know whether whatever jazz I occasionally get while roaming the FM dial is modern or not. But I have to quarrel with your "4 things" rule--most of the music I listen to is classical and contains no words. Surely that's music anyway? :-) Neil Yes....That's true....There is opera....But the words in opera are definitely not a part of the musical experience....If anything, they detract, which is why we love operas in another language.......Words are, however, an important part of popular music, and some popular songs are very beautiful. (to me, at least) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Is photography art?
NJH wrote in message ... "William Graham" wrote in message news:rmPcb.586749$uu5.96374@sccrnsc04... Gregory W. Blank wrote in message ... In article q8Ocb.582844$o%2.265711@sccrnsc02, "William Graham" wrote: How about the talented artist that abandons his talent and produces junk just to make lots of money.....(Picasso is a good example) Is everything that he/she produces art? Does a capable artist produce art always? Again, is the process important, or just the end result? Survival I believe is an important concept. I would state that a balanced "Artist" can have both worlds, if that is what they choose. That is fullfillment and the ability to produce saleable if less than fullfilling work. Yes, but....If Pacasso picks up a dirty envelope from the gutter and signs his name to it, it becomes immediately worth several thousand dollars....But is it art? If the process is important, then the dirty envelope has no process, so it isn't art....So why does it have value? That's a metaphysical question. It has "value" because people will pay money for it. It has no more intrinsic value than any other dirty envelope, obviously. Why was a length of clothesline tacked to a wall "worth" $7,000.00? Because some "artist" well received in artsy circles tacked it there. Neil Well.....Not to MY wall, he doesn't....I require some proof of skill before I'll pay for any work of art.....Sometimes just the skill is enough....I can spend 30 minutes just staring at that piece of broken bread, or the wineglass half full of wine in Dali's, "Last Supper". His incredible ability to use a paintbrush just astounds me......... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Is photography art?
NJH wrote in message ... "William Graham" wrote in message news:b4Ocb.580196$Ho3.109288@sccrnsc03... NJH wrote in message ... "William Graham" wrote in message et... John Stafford wrote in message ... William Graham wrote: I spent my working life operating a very complicated high energy physics research machine. I was part of a crew of 15 or 20 people who did this around the clock for a living. No two of us operated the machine the same way, with the same finesse and ultimate results. It was a complex, and primarily decision making process. There is no question in my mind as to its being an art. Oh fer Gawd's sake... It's not up to you whether it was Art. So it was complex! Big deal! Is everything that is complex and done in a unique, demanding way Art? I think not! Get over it. Anything that two people do differently, and it can be said that one does it better than the other, is art. [ . . . ] What utter gibberish. If you keep pounding the word "art" into some sort of shapeless mush such that it no longer has any meaning, what word will you invent to mean what "art" used to mean? Or are you so insensible to the concept of real art that you just don't think it's important to have a word for it? Neil Answer the question I posed above about the end product being the lone consideration in the definition, or is the process important....... The process is important. Also the question about the four or five common disciplines....(Painting, sculpture, music, dance, and literature) Does art have to be restricted to these five? No. Neil Ah....Then where do you draw the line? - Operating a high-energy physics machine can't be art, in your opinion, but art can stray from the above mentioned five disciplines......So what makes any particular activity art, in your opinion? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Is photography art?
My grandmothers lasagna was an art. But her veal scallopini was a religion.
"William Graham" wrote in message news:Kb5db.437471$cF.139775@rwcrnsc53... NJH wrote in message ... "William Graham" wrote in message news:b4Ocb.580196$Ho3.109288@sccrnsc03... NJH wrote in message ... "William Graham" wrote in message et... John Stafford wrote in message ... William Graham wrote: I spent my working life operating a very complicated high energy physics research machine. I was part of a crew of 15 or 20 people who did this around the clock for a living. No two of us operated the machine the same way, with the same finesse and ultimate results. It was a complex, and primarily decision making process. There is no question in my mind as to its being an art. Oh fer Gawd's sake... It's not up to you whether it was Art. So it was complex! Big deal! Is everything that is complex and done in a unique, demanding way Art? I think not! Get over it. Anything that two people do differently, and it can be said that one does it better than the other, is art. [ . . . ] What utter gibberish. If you keep pounding the word "art" into some sort of shapeless mush such that it no longer has any meaning, what word will you invent to mean what "art" used to mean? Or are you so insensible to the concept of real art that you just don't think it's important to have a word for it? Neil Answer the question I posed above about the end product being the lone consideration in the definition, or is the process important....... The process is important. Also the question about the four or five common disciplines....(Painting, sculpture, music, dance, and literature) Does art have to be restricted to these five? No. Neil Ah....Then where do you draw the line? - Operating a high-energy physics machine can't be art, in your opinion, but art can stray from the above mentioned five disciplines......So what makes any particular activity art, in your opinion? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Is photography art?
"BuGz" wrote in
newse8db.437342$Oz4.245948@rwcrnsc54: My grandmothers lasagna was an art. But her veal scallopini was a religion. I'm coming over for dinner. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Is photography art?
"William Graham" wrote in message . net... NJH wrote in message ... "William Graham" wrote in message news:FRNcb.586236$uu5.95963@sccrnsc04... NJH wrote in message ... There are a lot of people who think good art can be obtained through originality.....Unfortunately, it takes more than originality to be good....I would rather look at something beautiful that I've seen many times before, than look at something that is ugly, simply because I haven't seen it before. This weird, "taste" of mine manifests itself in the modern music.....I think most of it is gastly....I would much rather hear a symphony or opera that I've heard many times before than to sit through some of the catcalls that pass as modern music...... Hear, hear! And that's even without getting into so-called "rap music" (now there's an oxymoron if I ever heard one). Neil Yes, but I am fond of annoying my musical friends by saying that music includes 4 things......Beat, Words, Harmony, and Melody...And rap has three of them: Beat, words and melody, But modern jazz only has two: Beat, and harmony....So which is more like music? (I am obviously not a lover of modern jazz....) Heh. That's pretty interesting. I only occasionally like jazz (and not for very long at that), and rap I can't stand at all. I'm not sure I know what you mean by "modern jazz"--I don't really know anything about music in a technical sense, and don't know whether whatever jazz I occasionally get while roaming the FM dial is modern or not. But I have to quarrel with your "4 things" rule--most of the music I listen to is classical and contains no words. Surely that's music anyway? :-) Neil Yes....That's true....There is opera....But the words in opera are definitely not a part of the musical experience....If anything, they detract, which is why we love operas in another language....... I was really thinking of music which has no words at all. Chopin, Beethoven, Rimsky-Korsakov, those sorts of things. Words are, however, an important part of popular music, and some popular songs are very beautiful. (to me, at least) Sure, I agree. Though I am inclined to prefer songs which I suppose would be called "once popular" rather than popular, especially songs of the 1930s and thereabouts. Neil |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Is photography art?
"William Graham" wrote in message . net... NJH wrote in message ... "William Graham" wrote in message news:rmPcb.586749$uu5.96374@sccrnsc04... Gregory W. Blank wrote in message ... In article q8Ocb.582844$o%2.265711@sccrnsc02, "William Graham" wrote: How about the talented artist that abandons his talent and produces junk just to make lots of money.....(Picasso is a good example) Is everything that he/she produces art? Does a capable artist produce art always? Again, is the process important, or just the end result? Survival I believe is an important concept. I would state that a balanced "Artist" can have both worlds, if that is what they choose. That is fullfillment and the ability to produce saleable if less than fullfilling work. Yes, but....If Pacasso picks up a dirty envelope from the gutter and signs his name to it, it becomes immediately worth several thousand dollars....But is it art? If the process is important, then the dirty envelope has no process, so it isn't art....So why does it have value? That's a metaphysical question. It has "value" because people will pay money for it. It has no more intrinsic value than any other dirty envelope, obviously. Why was a length of clothesline tacked to a wall "worth" $7,000.00? Because some "artist" well received in artsy circles tacked it there. Neil Well.....Not to MY wall, he doesn't....I require some proof of skill before I'll pay for any work of art.....Sometimes just the skill is enough....I can spend 30 minutes just staring at that piece of broken bread, or the wineglass half full of wine in Dali's, "Last Supper". His incredible ability to use a paintbrush just astounds me......... Agreed! . . . It's the difference between real art and junk art. Junk art is interesting too, but only as a kind of fad phenomenon or psychosocial curiosity, not as art. Neil |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Is photography art?
"William Graham" wrote in message news:Kb5db.437471$cF.139775@rwcrnsc53... NJH wrote in message ... "William Graham" wrote in message news:b4Ocb.580196$Ho3.109288@sccrnsc03... NJH wrote in message ... "William Graham" wrote in message et... John Stafford wrote in message ... William Graham wrote: I spent my working life operating a very complicated high energy physics research machine. I was part of a crew of 15 or 20 people who did this around the clock for a living. No two of us operated the machine the same way, with the same finesse and ultimate results. It was a complex, and primarily decision making process. There is no question in my mind as to its being an art. Oh fer Gawd's sake... It's not up to you whether it was Art. So it was complex! Big deal! Is everything that is complex and done in a unique, demanding way Art? I think not! Get over it. Anything that two people do differently, and it can be said that one does it better than the other, is art. [ . . . ] What utter gibberish. If you keep pounding the word "art" into some sort of shapeless mush such that it no longer has any meaning, what word will you invent to mean what "art" used to mean? Or are you so insensible to the concept of real art that you just don't think it's important to have a word for it? Neil Answer the question I posed above about the end product being the lone consideration in the definition, or is the process important....... The process is important. Also the question about the four or five common disciplines....(Painting, sculpture, music, dance, and literature) Does art have to be restricted to these five? No. Neil Ah....Then where do you draw the line? - I don't draw any line. Operating a high-energy physics machine can't be art, in your opinion, I've said this repeatedly: ANY activity requiring a modicum of skill may be an art in some sense, but not in the sense of fine art. but art can stray from the above mentioned five disciplines......So what makes any particular activity art, in your opinion? Art in any sense at all, or fine art? Neil |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Is photography art?
NJH wrote in message m... "William Graham" wrote in message . net... NJH wrote in message ... "William Graham" wrote in message news:FRNcb.586236$uu5.95963@sccrnsc04... NJH wrote in message ... There are a lot of people who think good art can be obtained through originality.....Unfortunately, it takes more than originality to be good....I would rather look at something beautiful that I've seen many times before, than look at something that is ugly, simply because I haven't seen it before. This weird, "taste" of mine manifests itself in the modern music.....I think most of it is gastly....I would much rather hear a symphony or opera that I've heard many times before than to sit through some of the catcalls that pass as modern music...... Hear, hear! And that's even without getting into so-called "rap music" (now there's an oxymoron if I ever heard one). Neil Yes, but I am fond of annoying my musical friends by saying that music includes 4 things......Beat, Words, Harmony, and Melody...And rap has three of them: Beat, words and melody, But modern jazz only has two: Beat, and harmony....So which is more like music? (I am obviously not a lover of modern jazz....) Heh. That's pretty interesting. I only occasionally like jazz (and not for very long at that), and rap I can't stand at all. I'm not sure I know what you mean by "modern jazz"--I don't really know anything about music in a technical sense, and don't know whether whatever jazz I occasionally get while roaming the FM dial is modern or not. But I have to quarrel with your "4 things" rule--most of the music I listen to is classical and contains no words. Surely that's music anyway? :-) Neil Yes....That's true....There is opera....But the words in opera are definitely not a part of the musical experience....If anything, they detract, which is why we love operas in another language....... I was really thinking of music which has no words at all. Chopin, Beethoven, Rimsky-Korsakov, those sorts of things. Words are, however, an important part of popular music, and some popular songs are very beautiful. (to me, at least) Sure, I agree. Though I am inclined to prefer songs which I suppose would be called "once popular" rather than popular, especially songs of the 1930s and thereabouts. Neil Yes, but the music that really depends on words for its popularity is the folk music of the 60's....Pieces like, "Cat's in the Cradle..." |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Is photography art?
NJH wrote in message m... "William Graham" wrote in message . net... NJH wrote in message ... "William Graham" wrote in message news:rmPcb.586749$uu5.96374@sccrnsc04... Gregory W. Blank wrote in message ... In article q8Ocb.582844$o%2.265711@sccrnsc02, "William Graham" wrote: How about the talented artist that abandons his talent and produces junk just to make lots of money.....(Picasso is a good example) Is everything that he/she produces art? Does a capable artist produce art always? Again, is the process important, or just the end result? Survival I believe is an important concept. I would state that a balanced "Artist" can have both worlds, if that is what they choose. That is fullfillment and the ability to produce saleable if less than fullfilling work. Yes, but....If Pacasso picks up a dirty envelope from the gutter and signs his name to it, it becomes immediately worth several thousand dollars....But is it art? If the process is important, then the dirty envelope has no process, so it isn't art....So why does it have value? That's a metaphysical question. It has "value" because people will pay money for it. It has no more intrinsic value than any other dirty envelope, obviously. Why was a length of clothesline tacked to a wall "worth" $7,000.00? Because some "artist" well received in artsy circles tacked it there. Neil Well.....Not to MY wall, he doesn't....I require some proof of skill before I'll pay for any work of art.....Sometimes just the skill is enough....I can spend 30 minutes just staring at that piece of broken bread, or the wineglass half full of wine in Dali's, "Last Supper". His incredible ability to use a paintbrush just astounds me......... Agreed! . . . It's the difference between real art and junk art. Junk art is interesting too, but only as a kind of fad phenomenon or psychosocial curiosity, not as art. Neil Yes...But everyone sees it differently....My brother in law saw the whole painting, not just the bread and wineglass (and folded, ironed, and spread out tablecloth, which is also amazing) and he said, "It looks like a giant spider to me." - And I stood back and looked at the whole thing, and in a way, he was right, it did look like a giant spider.....So I was impressed with the technique, and the fantastic brush control, while he looked at the whole painting as a giant design, and saw its resemblance to a big spider...... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Photography books | BlueDoze | Digital Photography | 2 | June 29th 04 06:06 PM |
New Digital Photography Community Forum Announcement | George | Digital Photography | 1 | June 24th 04 06:14 PM |
Fuji S2 and Metz 44 Mz-2 Flash | elchief | In The Darkroom | 3 | April 7th 04 10:20 AM |
Photo paper for pinhole photography. | Jevin Sweval | In The Darkroom | 2 | February 20th 04 05:50 PM |
Night Photography | Tom Phillips | In The Darkroom | 17 | February 6th 04 12:47 AM |