A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital ZLR Cameras
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Noise in digital picture



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 12th 06, 10:36 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.zlr
Bill Again
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 27
Default Noise in digital picture

There has been some ongoing discussion about noise in digital pics and the
general assumption is that it is a "bad thing". Camera manufacturers work
hard to eliminate it, as discussed in the recent posts over the FZ30.
However, I came across a blog today which cites an academic paper suggesting
that noise can also be your friend. I have pasted the blog below, followed
by a link to the paper.

The comment about the possibility that Canon "build in about the right
amount of noise" is something that Panasonic might take on board.

Bill

PS The blogger is an architectural photographer based in the UK.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
quote

This [see URL below] is an academic paper on the perception of sharpness in
digital photographs. I find this fascinating because it confirms a belief
that I have developed about why images scanned from film can still look
better than a digital image of apparently the same number of megapixels.

To my eye, digital images look unnaturally smooth as they lack the grain
which is exhibited by film. This paper suggests (among other things) that
adding a small amount of fake grain to a digital image can enhance its
perceived sharpness.

This is apparently quite an astounding discovery, because adding "noise"
using a tool like Photoshop, will in a strict sense reduce the amount of
correct information in the image. This is astounding to all but
psychologists of perception who know only too well that human perception is
a construct that overlays our preconceptions over the data we receive from
the outside world.

In this case, the human perceptual system appears to be fooled into thinking
that the extra random information which results from adding noise or
artificial grain to an image, is actually real information.

The amount of noise which needs to be added is actually rather subtle and
unfortunately this paper lacks enough detail about what kind or intensity of
noise was actually added. As a result, I can't see how it would be possible
to replicate their experiment accurately to confirm their results. I assume
that if this paper is eventually peer reviewed and published, that this
shortcoming will be addressed.

I've found that its possible to use Photoshop to add noise to achieve an
apparent improvement with a variety of digital file sizes from 6-39
Megapixels, and I have a theory that Canon engineers build in about the
right amount of noise (or rather let about the right amount through their
noise reduction algorithms) in the case of the 1DsII flagship camera.

Unfortunately the built in filters provided by Photoshop don't have the most
agreeable effect to my eye, I prefer proprietary third part software which
allows for more subtle and film grain like effects.

unquote

http://www.cis.rit.edu/people/facult...PDFs/PRO12.pdf



  #2  
Old September 13th 06, 12:29 AM posted to rec.photo.digital.zlr
Paul Heslop
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,243
Default Noise in digital picture

Bill Again wrote:

There has been some ongoing discussion about noise in digital pics and the
general assumption is that it is a "bad thing". Camera manufacturers work
hard to eliminate it, as discussed in the recent posts over the FZ30.
However, I came across a blog today which cites an academic paper suggesting
that noise can also be your friend. I have pasted the blog below, followed
by a link to the paper.

The comment about the possibility that Canon "build in about the right
amount of noise" is something that Panasonic might take on board.

Bill

But noise can also be ugly, jagged, nasty blotchy and totally unlike
film grain.


--
Paul (This sky, too, is folding under you)
------------------------------------------------------
Stop and Look
http://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/
  #3  
Old September 13th 06, 12:50 AM posted to rec.photo.digital.zlr
Bill Again
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 27
Default Noise in digital picture


"Paul Heslop" wrote in message
...
Bill Again wrote:

There has been some ongoing discussion about noise in digital pics and
the
general assumption is that it is a "bad thing". Camera manufacturers work
hard to eliminate it, as discussed in the recent posts over the FZ30.
However, I came across a blog today which cites an academic paper
suggesting
that noise can also be your friend. I have pasted the blog below,
followed
by a link to the paper.

The comment about the possibility that Canon "build in about the right
amount of noise" is something that Panasonic might take on board.

Bill

But noise can also be ugly, jagged, nasty blotchy and totally unlike
film grain.


--
Paul (This sky, too, is folding under you)


Exactly true. But this paper is suggesting that in other circumstances it
can actually add something to the picture. It is important in this respect
that we do not perceive it as "noise" but that, psychologically seen, we
subconsciously perceive it as enhancing the picture in some way. *That* is
what I found interesting, not the blotches.

Bill


  #4  
Old September 13th 06, 10:53 AM posted to rec.photo.digital.zlr
Paul Heslop
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,243
Default Noise in digital picture

Bill Again wrote:

"Paul Heslop" wrote in message
...
Bill Again wrote:

There has been some ongoing discussion about noise in digital pics and
the
general assumption is that it is a "bad thing". Camera manufacturers work
hard to eliminate it, as discussed in the recent posts over the FZ30.
However, I came across a blog today which cites an academic paper
suggesting
that noise can also be your friend. I have pasted the blog below,
followed
by a link to the paper.

The comment about the possibility that Canon "build in about the right
amount of noise" is something that Panasonic might take on board.

Bill

But noise can also be ugly, jagged, nasty blotchy and totally unlike
film grain.


--
Paul (This sky, too, is folding under you)


Exactly true. But this paper is suggesting that in other circumstances it
can actually add something to the picture. It is important in this respect
that we do not perceive it as "noise" but that, psychologically seen, we
subconsciously perceive it as enhancing the picture in some way. *That* is
what I found interesting, not the blotches.

Bill


I've had a couple that looked okay with the 'noise' level and I agree
about the grain thing, but noise can be awful and sometimes adjusting,
say, a darkening sky in an image can show immediately just how bad
that noise is. This is I would say with film grain it doesn't affect
the detail, where noise can degrade the image around the edges of
lines etc.


--
Paul (This sky, too, is folding under you)
------------------------------------------------------
Stop and Look
http://www.geocities.com/dreamst8me/
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ISO 200000 ? Gene F. Rhodes Digital Photography 113 February 4th 06 05:58 PM
Digital Stock /Footage & Clips CDs, updated 24/Jan/2006 [email protected] Digital Photography 8 February 3rd 06 04:00 AM
[LONG] Theoretical estimates for film-equivalent digital sens Ilya Zakharevich Digital Photography 52 April 9th 05 09:06 AM
How to Buy a Digital Camera [email protected] Digital Photography 6 January 18th 05 11:01 PM
Digital Imaging vs. (Digital and Film) Photography Bob Monaghan Medium Format Photography Equipment 9 June 19th 04 05:48 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.