![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have always wondered if lenses for the Mamiya TLRs were exactly the
same or the viewing lens was the result of QC testing and found to be of poorer quality and therefore used as a viewing lens. Would you be able to contact Mamiya's Japanese office and ask them? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "RolandRB" wrote in message om... I have always wondered if lenses for the Mamiya TLRs were exactly the same or the viewing lens was the result of QC testing and found to be of poorer quality and therefore used as a viewing lens. Would you be able to contact Mamiya's Japanese office and ask them? That's not the sort of question one is likely to get a straight answer to. Watch this space. (It's 10:00 pn here now.) David J. Littleboy Tokyo, Japan |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Hi David! ;-) quoting from http://medfmt.8k.com/mf/mamiyatlrlens.html Roland wrote I've taken apart both viewing and taking lenses for cleaning and both the taking and viewing lenses look identical to each other and are constructed the same. This includes taking out individual lens elements for cleaning. I've swapped them round and noticed no difference at all. They would seem to be identical twins. So next time you see one for sale on ebay with a slightly spoiled taking lens then help yourself to a bargain. endquote these posters suggest they are the same for these mamiya tlr lenses... In many other TLRs, of course, the viewing lens is faster so as to provide narrowed DOF and sharper focusing, or less complex as it is not being used to make the photo, just an image to focus (fewer elements etc.). if you do swap lenses, be sure to recollimate the new setup, as shims will likely need to be set to make them match up again... hope this helps bobm -- ************************************************** ********************* * Robert Monaghan POB 752182 Southern Methodist Univ. Dallas Tx 75275 * ********************Standard Disclaimers Apply************************* |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob Monaghan" wrote: Hi David! ;-) quoting from http://medfmt.8k.com/mf/mamiyatlrlens.html Roland wrote I've taken apart both viewing and taking lenses for cleaning and both the taking and viewing lenses look identical to each other and are constructed the same. This includes taking out individual lens elements for cleaning. I've swapped them round and noticed no difference at all. They would seem to be identical twins. So next time you see one for sale on ebay with a slightly spoiled taking lens then help yourself to a bargain. endquote these posters suggest they are the same for these mamiya tlr lenses... In many other TLRs, of course, the viewing lens is faster so as to provide narrowed DOF and sharper focusing, or less complex as it is not being used to make the photo, just an image to focus (fewer elements etc.). if you do swap lenses, be sure to recollimate the new setup, as shims will likely need to be set to make them match up again... FWIW, Mamiya's comment is that the lenses are matched closely for focal length, and that there really isn't a large difference between them. But the taking lens will, in most cases, exhibit higher resolution than the viewing lens. No surprisesg. Also, FWIW, they were quite friendly and happy to discuss it. The receptionist who answered the phone immediately got me to someone who sounded quite sensible. David J. Littleboy Tokyo, Japan |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob Monaghan" wrote: Hi David! ;-) quoting from http://medfmt.8k.com/mf/mamiyatlrlens.html Roland wrote I've taken apart both viewing and taking lenses for cleaning and both the taking and viewing lenses look identical to each other and are constructed the same. This includes taking out individual lens elements for cleaning. I've swapped them round and noticed no difference at all. They would seem to be identical twins. So next time you see one for sale on ebay with a slightly spoiled taking lens then help yourself to a bargain. endquote these posters suggest they are the same for these mamiya tlr lenses... In many other TLRs, of course, the viewing lens is faster so as to provide narrowed DOF and sharper focusing, or less complex as it is not being used to make the photo, just an image to focus (fewer elements etc.). if you do swap lenses, be sure to recollimate the new setup, as shims will likely need to be set to make them match up again... FWIW, Mamiya's comment is that the lenses are matched closely for focal length, and that there really isn't a large difference between them. But the taking lens will, in most cases, exhibit higher resolution than the viewing lens. No surprisesg. Also, FWIW, they were quite friendly and happy to discuss it. The receptionist who answered the phone immediately got me to someone who sounded quite sensible. David J. Littleboy Tokyo, Japan |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"David J. Littleboy" wrote in message ...
"Bob Monaghan" wrote: Hi David! ;-) quoting from http://medfmt.8k.com/mf/mamiyatlrlens.html Roland wrote I've taken apart both viewing and taking lenses for cleaning and both the taking and viewing lenses look identical to each other and are constructed the same. This includes taking out individual lens elements for cleaning. I've swapped them round and noticed no difference at all. They would seem to be identical twins. So next time you see one for sale on ebay with a slightly spoiled taking lens then help yourself to a bargain. endquote these posters suggest they are the same for these mamiya tlr lenses... In many other TLRs, of course, the viewing lens is faster so as to provide narrowed DOF and sharper focusing, or less complex as it is not being used to make the photo, just an image to focus (fewer elements etc.). if you do swap lenses, be sure to recollimate the new setup, as shims will likely need to be set to make them match up again... FWIW, Mamiya's comment is that the lenses are matched closely for focal length, and that there really isn't a large difference between them. But the taking lens will, in most cases, exhibit higher resolution than the viewing lens. No surprisesg. Also, FWIW, they were quite friendly and happy to discuss it. The receptionist who answered the phone immediately got me to someone who sounded quite sensible. David J. Littleboy Tokyo, Japan At last. Thankyou. I'm guessing the higher resolutions for the taking lens will show up more at wider apertures when the resolution is not diffraction limited. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"David J. Littleboy" wrote in message ...
"Bob Monaghan" wrote: Hi David! ;-) quoting from http://medfmt.8k.com/mf/mamiyatlrlens.html Roland wrote I've taken apart both viewing and taking lenses for cleaning and both the taking and viewing lenses look identical to each other and are constructed the same. This includes taking out individual lens elements for cleaning. I've swapped them round and noticed no difference at all. They would seem to be identical twins. So next time you see one for sale on ebay with a slightly spoiled taking lens then help yourself to a bargain. endquote these posters suggest they are the same for these mamiya tlr lenses... In many other TLRs, of course, the viewing lens is faster so as to provide narrowed DOF and sharper focusing, or less complex as it is not being used to make the photo, just an image to focus (fewer elements etc.). if you do swap lenses, be sure to recollimate the new setup, as shims will likely need to be set to make them match up again... FWIW, Mamiya's comment is that the lenses are matched closely for focal length, and that there really isn't a large difference between them. But the taking lens will, in most cases, exhibit higher resolution than the viewing lens. No surprisesg. Also, FWIW, they were quite friendly and happy to discuss it. The receptionist who answered the phone immediately got me to someone who sounded quite sensible. David J. Littleboy Tokyo, Japan At last. Thankyou. I'm guessing the higher resolutions for the taking lens will show up more at wider apertures when the resolution is not diffraction limited. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
REQUEST: Recommendation for U/W dig camera/housing | Quiet Voice | Digital Photography | 4 | August 6th 04 10:43 PM |
[SI] Small request, some notes. | Al Denelsbeck | 35mm Photo Equipment | 1 | August 6th 04 02:18 AM |
Photography Link Request | macforce | Fine Art, Framing and Display | 2 | April 24th 04 10:14 PM |
photography Link Request | macforce | Photographing People | 0 | April 20th 04 08:51 PM |
a request to Steve Young | [email protected] | Film & Labs | 0 | February 2nd 04 10:44 PM |