A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

First P&S that may "may" not be a piece of crap?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 23rd 08, 05:39 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
2SQUID
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 108
Default First P&S that may "may" not be a piece of crap?

Rich wrote:
Sick of the idiocy of the ultrazoom, itty-bitty sensored junk that
they sell as P&S's today? Maybe this one will be different. An f2
lens! Shades of 2001 and the Olympus C-3040!! A conservative zoom
range and a larger sensor.

http://www.dpreview.com/news/0807/08...clx3.asp#specs


Panasonic don't have the sensor technology to make a decent 4/3 sensor.
How are they going to get it right with a FF one?
  #2  
Old July 23rd 08, 07:11 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
Blinky the Shark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 827
Default First P&S that may "may" not be a piece of crap?

2SQUID wrote:

Rich wrote:
Sick of the idiocy of the ultrazoom, itty-bitty sensored junk that
they sell as P&S's today? Maybe this one will be different. An f2
lens! Shades of 2001 and the Olympus C-3040!! A conservative zoom
range and a larger sensor.

http://www.dpreview.com/news/0807/08...clx3.asp#specs


Panasonic don't have the sensor technology to make a decent 4/3 sensor.
How are they going to get it right with a FF one?


What am I missin'? That looks like 1/1.63".


--
Blinky
Killing all posts from Google Groups
The Usenet Improvement Project: http://improve-usenet.org
Need a new news feed? http://blinkynet.net/comp/newfeed.html

  #3  
Old July 23rd 08, 12:46 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Jufi[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 95
Default First P&S that may "may" not be a piece of crap?


"2SQUID" wrote in message
...
Rich wrote:
Sick of the idiocy of the ultrazoom, itty-bitty sensored junk that
they sell as P&S's today? Maybe this one will be different. An f2
lens! Shades of 2001 and the Olympus C-3040!! A conservative zoom
range and a larger sensor.

http://www.dpreview.com/news/0807/08...clx3.asp#specs


Panasonic don't have the sensor technology to make a decent 4/3 sensor.
How are they going to get it right with a FF one?


A 1/1.63" sensor is now considered FF? Huh?

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
First P&S that may "may" not be a piece of crap? Russell D. Digital Photography 8 July 24th 08 12:54 PM
First P&S that may "may" not be a piece of crap? /dev/null/ Digital Photography 1 July 23rd 08 12:56 PM
Finally a P&S that isn't a piece of crap? Rich Digital Photography 34 March 16th 08 09:02 PM
How to insert the "modified time" attribute in "date taken" attrib in batch mode ashjas Digital Photography 4 November 8th 06 09:00 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2022 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.