One area film has it over digital

(Ray Fischer) wrote in news:4f6e9896$0$11956
:


The Canon image happened to be 3200 ISO,

And looks very nice for ISO 3200. Certainly much better than any
color film.

but it doesn't matter too much
when it comes to dark backgrounds.

Idiot troll.


Well, tell you what, you take the image, raise the levels yourself and see
what you see.

(Ray Fischer) wrote in news:4f6e98d9$0$11956
:


High ISO film frankly sucked! The high ISO samples of the 5D mk.III and
the Nikon D800 out performs any film I have ever worked with (goes back
to 1969 for me)

Could you even get an ISO 3200 color film? From what I remember the
fastest color films went up to 1600.


Do you ever get tired of being wrong? I've shot it.

http://www.flickr.com/groups/1726784...7603999256915/

"Rich" wrote in message
...
(Ray Fischer) wrote in news:4f6e98d9$0$11956
:
High ISO film frankly sucked! The high ISO samples of the 5D mk.III and
the Nikon D800 out performs any film I have ever worked with (goes back
to 1969 for me)

Could you even get an ISO 3200 color film? From what I remember the
fastest color films went up to 1600.


Do you ever get tired of being wrong? I've shot it.

http://www.flickr.com/groups/1726784...7603999256915/


Right, the Konica 3200 (and push processing 800 films) was proof that modern
digital SLR's are far better at that speed! :-)

Trevor.