A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Photo Equipment » Large Format Photography Equipment
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Recommendation Request



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 13th 11, 07:16 PM posted to rec.photo.equipment.large-format
Stefan Patric[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 19
Default Recommendation Request

On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 10:49:06 -0700, Cheesehead wrote:

If you were to pick a lens from 400 to 500mm, what would you choose?
8x10 coverage with modest movement is adequate. I prefer something in a
shutter & synced.


What are you going to use the lens for? General photography? Table top/
still life? Portraits? Flat art copy work? Etc. You want a new one or
will used do? How modest the movements? What's your budget?

Stef
  #2  
Old March 14th 11, 05:18 AM posted to rec.photo.equipment.large-format
Stefan Patric[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 19
Default Recommendation Request

On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 13:06:28 -0700, Cheesehead wrote:

On Mar 13, 3:16*pm, Stefan Patric wrote:
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 10:49:06 -0700, Cheesehead wrote:
If you were to pick a lens from 400 to 500mm, what would you choose?
8x10 coverage with modest movement is adequate. I prefer something in
a shutter & synced.


What are you going to use the lens for? *General photography? *Table
top/ still life? *Portraits? *Flat art copy work? *Etc. *You want a new
one or will used do? *How modest the movements? *What's your budget?

Stef


Well, I shoot portraits and landscapes. No closeup/macro type movement.
For movements, a little rise or all seems to be all I ever use. Budget
-- let's keep it under $800


Of the "modern" lenses, I can think of two that might work for you:

Fujinon 420mm f8 L-series, #3 Copal shutter, 60 degree coverage, IIRC,
which gave it a decent range of movements. It was a modern computer
design of the classic Tessar (4 elements in 3 groups). AFAIK, no longer
made. So, only available used. Not all that popular because of the 60
degree coverage when it was new 20 to 30 years ago. So, you should be
able to get one for well less than your budget.

Nikon made a 450mm Apo-Tessar (f11??) around the same time, but it was
optimized for a 1:5 reproduction ratio (not infinity like general purpose
lenses). It was best for table top, product and copy work, but was fine
at infinity if stopped down. VERY sharp, probably too sharp for
portraits without a softening filter of some sort.

Stef
  #3  
Old March 15th 11, 05:06 AM posted to rec.photo.equipment.large-format
Stefan Patric[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 19
Default Recommendation Request

On Mon, 14 Mar 2011 12:14:22 -0700, Cheesehead wrote:

On Mar 14, 1:18*am, Stefan Patric wrote:
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 13:06:28 -0700, Cheesehead wrote:
On Mar 13, 3:16*pm, Stefan Patric wrote:
On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 10:49:06 -0700, Cheesehead wrote:
If you were to pick a lens from 400 to 500mm, what would you
choose? 8x10 coverage with modest movement is adequate. I prefer
something in a shutter & synced.


What are you going to use the lens for? *General photography? *Table
top/ still life? *Portraits? *Flat art copy work? *Etc. *You want a
new one or will used do? *How modest the movements? *What's your
budget?


Stef


Well, I shoot portraits and landscapes. *No closeup/macro type
movement. For movements, a little rise or all seems to be all I ever
use. Budget -- let's keep it under $800


Of the "modern" lenses, I can think of two that might work for you:

Fujinon 420mm f8 L-series, #3 Copal shutter, 60 degree coverage, IIRC,
which gave it a decent range of movements. *It was a modern computer
design of the classic Tessar (4 elements in 3 groups). *AFAIK, no
longer made. *So, only available used. *Not all that popular because of
the 60 degree coverage when it was new 20 to 30 years ago. *So, you
should be able to get one for well less than your budget.

Nikon made a 450mm Apo-Tessar (f11??) around the same time, but it was
optimized for a 1:5 reproduction ratio (not infinity like general
purpose lenses). *It was best for table top, product and copy work, but
was fine at infinity if stopped down. *VERY sharp, probably too sharp
for portraits without a softening filter of some sort.

Stef


On the other hand, I recently picked up a big old Fujinon-W 300/5.6 in a
Copal 3.
So any lens cells that I can just plug into it will be a money saver.


Strange as it may sound, many times there is little cost differential
between just the cells, and cells with shutter. For my money, having a
couple extra shutters around just in case is a good thing.

Stef
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Recommendation Request: Good PnS Digital james Digital Photography 16 October 24th 09 11:22 PM
Recommendation Request: Good PnS Digital Michael[_6_] Other Photographic Equipment 0 October 20th 09 07:15 PM
Small Digital recommendation request Digital Photography 5 August 28th 06 09:34 PM
recommendation request chrisb Digital Photography 4 November 19th 04 09:35 PM
REQUEST: Recommendation for U/W dig camera/housing Jon C Digital Photography 8 July 28th 04 05:36 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2022 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.