If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Share beauties of Canadian Rockies
Sept 2- - Oct 4, 2003, I hiked in Canadian Rockies for two weeks.
Now the photo web for my hiking trip is up on-line. You are cordially invited to visit the new photo gallery. Hope you will enjoy the beauties of Canadian Rockies. http://128.111.124.127/ssr/CanadaRockies.htm Ronald |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Share beauties of Canadian Rockies
You have some nice images in there. I might make them smaller, and easier to
see. I would also recommend putting a some sort of visible watermark on your images otherwise they might end up in someone elsešs portfolio. -- PWW (Paul Wayne Wilson) Over 1,000 Photographs Online at, http://PhotoStockFile.com On 10/19/03 11:41 PM, in article , "Shu" wrote: Sept 2- - Oct 4, 2003, I hiked in Canadian Rockies for two weeks. Now the photo web for my hiking trip is up on-line. You are cordially invited to visit the new photo gallery. Hope you will enjoy the beauties of Canadian Rockies. http://128.111.124.127/ssr/CanadaRockies.htm Ronald |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Share beauties of Canadian Rockies
Shu wrote: Sept 2- - Oct 4, 2003, I hiked in Canadian Rockies for two weeks. Now the photo web for my hiking trip is up on-line. You are cordially invited to visit the new photo gallery. Hope you will enjoy the beauties of Canadian Rockies. http://128.111.124.127/ssr/CanadaRockies.htm Ronald Congrats. Maybe name your "kayaking" shots to "canoe" shots... (97-07) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Share beauties of Canadian Rockies
Question - is there any "value" to reduced sized web photos? Certainly a
print couldn't be made of any commercial value, IMHO. Also, with respect, I find your (PWW) copyright across the heart of the picture very distracting. Cheers, rma "PWW" wrote in message ... You have some nice images in there. I might make them smaller, and easier to see. I would also recommend putting a some sort of visible watermark on your images otherwise they might end up in someone elsešs portfolio. -- PWW (Paul Wayne Wilson) Over 1,000 Photographs Online at, http://PhotoStockFile.com On 10/19/03 11:41 PM, in article , "Shu" wrote: Sept 2- - Oct 4, 2003, I hiked in Canadian Rockies for two weeks. Now the photo web for my hiking trip is up on-line. You are cordially invited to visit the new photo gallery. Hope you will enjoy the beauties of Canadian Rockies. http://128.111.124.127/ssr/CanadaRockies.htm Ronald |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Share beauties of Canadian Rockies
Just wondering....I just added a photo section to my website. I put a
"no right click" javascript on all the photo pages with a friendly kind of message that says it you would like a copy to contact me Is that enough to stop people from stealing my photos? I know about Digimarc, but I'm not working at present, so $$ are rather tight. What does everyone else do to protect their work, but also get it out there for people to see? ralford wrote: Question - is there any "value" to reduced sized web photos? Certainly a print couldn't be made of any commercial value, IMHO. Also, with respect, I find your (PWW) copyright across the heart of the picture very distracting. Cheers, rma "PWW" wrote in message ... You have some nice images in there. I might make them smaller, and easier to see. I would also recommend putting a some sort of visible watermark on your images otherwise they might end up in someone elsešs portfolio. -- PWW (Paul Wayne Wilson) Over 1,000 Photographs Online at, http://PhotoStockFile.com On 10/19/03 11:41 PM, in article , "Shu" wrote: Sept 2- - Oct 4, 2003, I hiked in Canadian Rockies for two weeks. Now the photo web for my hiking trip is up on-line. You are cordially invited to visit the new photo gallery. Hope you will enjoy the beauties of Canadian Rockies. http://128.111.124.127/ssr/CanadaRockies.htm Ronald |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Share beauties of Canadian Rockies
All those special ways to stop copying just doesn't work very well. It seems
that there are ways around all of them. That is why I recommend putting a visible watermark on each and every image I put on the web. And use a lower resolution image of not to big of size. I just figure that I have to get my images out in front of clients and and accept a few thefts from my lower rez, smaller watermarked images might make them think twice about taking my images without my permission. I will still go after every single copyright infringement that I can. -- PWW (Paul Wayne Wilson) Over 1,000 Photographs Online at, http://PhotoStockFile.com On 10/20/03 2:51 PM, in article , "Carole" wrote: Just wondering....I just added a photo section to my website. I put a "no right click" javascript on all the photo pages with a friendly kind of message that says it you would like a copy to contact me Is that enough to stop people from stealing my photos? I know about Digimarc, but I'm not working at present, so $$ are rather tight. What does everyone else do to protect their work, but also get it out there for people to see? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Share beauties of Canadian Rockies
"PWW" wrote: snip That is why I recommend putting a visible watermark on each and every image I put on the web. And use a lower snip I think you have a very nice site, and if someone wants to buy the image, the watermark is not that distracting. Have fun, Dave |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Share beauties of Canadian Rockies
Did you look at his web-site? He had huge files on his site. I do believe
somebody could have used them for other reasons. Even if somebody wanted to get a hold of the photographer of a photograph they "took off his site" just to review and evaluate it, they might have a problem finding where they got it because he did not have a watermark on the photograph. Even if the photographs are copied and then only used on web-sites, the web-site business still should pay the photographer for that use. That makes it a "commercial value." It would be so easy for web-sites to use many unmarked photographs and some photographs would allow even printed materials being made from them. Yes, I agree my original Watermark is somewhat distracting. I am a little gun-shy or overprotective myself. I have changed it, but I have not changed all the photos on my main site yet. Gee whiz, over 900 photos is a lot to do, AGAIN... I will do it, but I have been rather busy lately. It would seem that your images would benefit from a watermark also. I took a look at your photos (pretty nice) an you are selling 4x6 prints, to people of your horse photos. With an web image size of 8.8x6.6 @ 72PPI, that is plenty large enough for some people to print nice 4x6, 5x7 and with a little work larger photographs. IMHO. -- PWW (Paul Wayne Wilson) Over 1,000 Photographs Online at, http://PhotoStockFile.com On 10/20/03 1:45 PM, in article xbVkb.4513$B_2.781@okepread02, "ralford" wrote: Question - is there any "value" to reduced sized web photos? Certainly a print couldn't be made of any commercial value, IMHO. Also, with respect, I find your (PWW) copyright across the heart of the picture very distracting. Cheers, rma "PWW" wrote in message ... You have some nice images in there. I might make them smaller, and easier to see. I would also recommend putting a some sort of visible watermark on your images otherwise they might end up in someone elsešs portfolio. -- PWW (Paul Wayne Wilson) Over 1,000 Photographs Online at, http://PhotoStockFile.com On 10/19/03 11:41 PM, in article , "Shu" wrote: Sept 2- - Oct 4, 2003, I hiked in Canadian Rockies for two weeks. Now the photo web for my hiking trip is up on-line. You are cordially invited to visit the new photo gallery. Hope you will enjoy the beauties of Canadian Rockies. http://128.111.124.127/ssr/CanadaRockies.htm Ronald |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Share beauties of Canadian Rockies
Thanks Dave,
-- PWW (Paul Wayne Wilson) Over 1,000 Photographs Online at, http://PhotoStockFile.com On 10/21/03 8:10 PM, in article . net, "DaveS" wrote: "PWW" wrote: snip That is why I recommend putting a visible watermark on each and every image I put on the web. And use a lower snip I think you have a very nice site, and if someone wants to buy the image, the watermark is not that distracting. Have fun, Dave |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Share beauties of Canadian Rockies
I'll have to look into watermarking. I've never done it, but I'm sure
there has to be some place on the web where you can learn how to do this? PWW wrote: All those special ways to stop copying just doesn't work very well. It seems that there are ways around all of them. That is why I recommend putting a visible watermark on each and every image I put on the web. And use a lower resolution image of not to big of size. I just figure that I have to get my images out in front of clients and and accept a few thefts from my lower rez, smaller watermarked images might make them think twice about taking my images without my permission. I will still go after every single copyright infringement that I can. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|