If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
"Dragon Spawn" wrote in message ... Ah, My camera can do 640x480, 1024x768, 1600x1200 and 2048x1536 But 2048x1536 is so big and the images are like 3Mb each! I tend to take 1600x1200 images Good quality and a reasonable size If size is an issue it is generally agreed that it is better to increase the JPEG compression rather than decrease the resolution. My 3 meg camera can output 2048x1536 at file sizes as low as a few hundred Kb if necessary. Dooey. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
"Dragon Spawn" wrote in message ... Ah, My camera can do 640x480, 1024x768, 1600x1200 and 2048x1536 But 2048x1536 is so big and the images are like 3Mb each! I tend to take 1600x1200 images Good quality and a reasonable size If size is an issue it is generally agreed that it is better to increase the JPEG compression rather than decrease the resolution. My 3 meg camera can output 2048x1536 at file sizes as low as a few hundred Kb if necessary. Dooey. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
I can reduce the quality I guess, would that be better?
dooey wrote: "Dragon Spawn" wrote in message ... Ah, My camera can do 640x480, 1024x768, 1600x1200 and 2048x1536 But 2048x1536 is so big and the images are like 3Mb each! I tend to take 1600x1200 images Good quality and a reasonable size If size is an issue it is generally agreed that it is better to increase the JPEG compression rather than decrease the resolution. My 3 meg camera can output 2048x1536 at file sizes as low as a few hundred Kb if necessary. Dooey. |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
I can reduce the quality I guess, would that be better?
dooey wrote: "Dragon Spawn" wrote in message ... Ah, My camera can do 640x480, 1024x768, 1600x1200 and 2048x1536 But 2048x1536 is so big and the images are like 3Mb each! I tend to take 1600x1200 images Good quality and a reasonable size If size is an issue it is generally agreed that it is better to increase the JPEG compression rather than decrease the resolution. My 3 meg camera can output 2048x1536 at file sizes as low as a few hundred Kb if necessary. Dooey. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Yes. My 3MP camera makes files well under 1 MB each. My new 6MP camera
makes 3MB jpegs. Dragon Spawn wrote: I can reduce the quality I guess, would that be better? dooey wrote: "Dragon Spawn" wrote in message ... Ah, My camera can do 640x480, 1024x768, 1600x1200 and 2048x1536 But 2048x1536 is so big and the images are like 3Mb each! I tend to take 1600x1200 images Good quality and a reasonable size If size is an issue it is generally agreed that it is better to increase the JPEG compression rather than decrease the resolution. My 3 meg camera can output 2048x1536 at file sizes as low as a few hundred Kb if necessary. Dooey. |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Yes. My 3MP camera makes files well under 1 MB each. My new 6MP camera
makes 3MB jpegs. Dragon Spawn wrote: I can reduce the quality I guess, would that be better? dooey wrote: "Dragon Spawn" wrote in message ... Ah, My camera can do 640x480, 1024x768, 1600x1200 and 2048x1536 But 2048x1536 is so big and the images are like 3Mb each! I tend to take 1600x1200 images Good quality and a reasonable size If size is an issue it is generally agreed that it is better to increase the JPEG compression rather than decrease the resolution. My 3 meg camera can output 2048x1536 at file sizes as low as a few hundred Kb if necessary. Dooey. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Yes. My 3MP camera makes files well under 1 MB each. My new 6MP camera
makes 3MB jpegs. Dragon Spawn wrote: I can reduce the quality I guess, would that be better? dooey wrote: "Dragon Spawn" wrote in message ... Ah, My camera can do 640x480, 1024x768, 1600x1200 and 2048x1536 But 2048x1536 is so big and the images are like 3Mb each! I tend to take 1600x1200 images Good quality and a reasonable size If size is an issue it is generally agreed that it is better to increase the JPEG compression rather than decrease the resolution. My 3 meg camera can output 2048x1536 at file sizes as low as a few hundred Kb if necessary. Dooey. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
"Dragon Spawn" wrote in message ... I can reduce the quality I guess, would that be better? Yes. You can then always drop the resolution later for normal web/email use but keep it high for photos and exhibition via the web. -- Dooey |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
"Dragon Spawn" wrote in message ... I can reduce the quality I guess, would that be better? Yes. You can then always drop the resolution later for normal web/email use but keep it high for photos and exhibition via the web. -- Dooey |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
"Dragon Spawn" wrote in message ... I can reduce the quality I guess, would that be better? Yes. You can then always drop the resolution later for normal web/email use but keep it high for photos and exhibition via the web. -- Dooey |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|