If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Will Sony Focus on FF hurt the supply...
....of half frame sensors for the likes of Fuji and Nikon? Can they
coop with the high density sensors on the side of the mainstream? We ain't talking phones here! Via Conon Rumors: http://tinyurl.com/pfecbw4 -- Bats can't tell us apart! ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Will Sony Focus on FF hurt the supply...
On 24/08/2015 17:23, android wrote:
...of half frame sensors for the likes of Fuji and Nikon? Can they coop with the high density sensors on the side of the mainstream? We ain't talking phones here! Via Conon Rumors: http://tinyurl.com/pfecbw4 Who wants to sell half-frame if you can sell full-frame? Doubtless the cameras and lenses for full-frame will bring in more profit. And the designs mostly already exist. For me, though, the micro-four-thirds cameras are adequate for my personal picture taking, and thankfully the days of dragging around bulky and heavy lenses are now past. The best MFT lenses are still quite expensive, though! -- Cheers, David Web: http://www.satsignal.eu |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Will Sony Focus on FF hurt the supply...
In article , David Taylor
wrote: Who wants to sell half-frame if you can sell full-frame? lots of companies, because the cameras can be manufactured for less and sold for less. Doubtless the cameras and lenses for full-frame will bring in more profit. not necessarily. And the designs mostly already exist. not really. the old designs are outdated. newer designs are *much* better, the nikon 14-24mm being a good example. For me, though, the micro-four-thirds cameras are adequate for my personal picture taking, and thankfully the days of dragging around bulky and heavy lenses are now past. The best MFT lenses are still quite expensive, though! you're demonstrating why companies sell aps and mft and why cellphone cameras are killing p&s cameras. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Will Sony Focus on FF hurt the supply...
On 25/08/2015 05:17, nospam wrote:
In article , David Taylor wrote: Who wants to sell half-frame if you can sell full-frame? lots of companies, because the cameras can be manufactured for less and sold for less. Sony don't sell many full-frame cameras compared to Nikon and Canon, while market share of FF vs APS-c and u4/3 must have increased dramatically, Sony have poured billions in to their sensor division. It would be interesting to see a breakdown, I'd guess that interchangeable lens camera sensors aren't what's driving production capacity increases, but phones, go-pro type devices, security cams, and just about any other device that's going to be part of the "internet of things" where some imaging function could be useful. There's plenty of other makers for APS-c and smaller imaging sensors. Nikon isn't tied to Sony, Canon and Samsung can make their own. Doubtless the cameras and lenses for full-frame will bring in more profit. not necessarily. And the designs mostly already exist. not really. the old designs are outdated. newer designs are *much* better, the nikon 14-24mm being a good example. For lower-price FF wide angle zooms, even a "budget" made in China Nikkor 18-35 AF-s performs much better (resolution etc) than any approximately equivalent field of view zoom on smaller APS-c or u4/3 formats. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Will Sony Focus on FF hurt the supply...
In article , Me
wrote: Sony don't sell many full-frame cameras compared to Nikon and Canon, sony don't sell many aps cameras either compared to nikon or canon. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Will Sony Focus on FF hurt the supply...
On 25/08/2015 12:34, nospam wrote:
In article , Me wrote: Sony don't sell many full-frame cameras compared to Nikon and Canon, sony don't sell many aps cameras either compared to nikon or canon. I have to wonder why any company would bother to invest serious $$$ to try to break in to a tech device market which hasn't had major shifts in market share since the '80s. From all accounts I've read, that new Samsung mirrorless is a bit of a tech marvel. I'd never buy one. I feel a bit the same about Sony. Either could close down their camera divisions on a whim. Look what Sony did with Vaio PCs - "too hard - we give up". |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Will Sony Focus on FF hurt the supply...
On 25/08/2015 15:50, RichA wrote:
On Monday, 24 August 2015 17:14:36 UTC-4, Me wrote: On 25/08/2015 05:17, nospam wrote: In article , David Taylor wrote: Who wants to sell half-frame if you can sell full-frame? lots of companies, because the cameras can be manufactured for less and sold for less. Sony don't sell many full-frame cameras compared to Nikon and Canon, while market share of FF vs APS-c and u4/3 must have increased dramatically, Sony have poured billions in to their sensor division. It would be interesting to see a breakdown, I'd guess that interchangeable lens camera sensors aren't what's driving production capacity increases, but phones, go-pro type devices, security cams, and just about any other device that's going to be part of the "internet of things" where some imaging function could be useful. There's plenty of other makers for APS-c and smaller imaging sensors. Nikon isn't tied to Sony, Canon and Samsung can make their own. Doubtless the cameras and lenses for full-frame will bring in more profit. not necessarily. And the designs mostly already exist. not really. the old designs are outdated. newer designs are *much* better, the nikon 14-24mm being a good example. For lower-price FF wide angle zooms, even a "budget" made in China Nikkor 18-35 AF-s performs much better (resolution etc) than any approximately equivalent field of view zoom on smaller APS-c or u4/3 formats. No, Olympus lenses (especially when it comes to edge correction) walk all over the lower-end Nikon stuff. Olympus's 12-40mm f/2.8 is sharp to the edge, wide open. But, overall resolution goes of course to the 24-42mp sensors, FF or otherwise. But there is a difference between resolution and sharpness. An Olympus 12-40 f2.8 isn't as wide (FOV equivalence 24-80mm vs 18-35) as the example I gave, it's slower (f5.6 "equivalence" vs F3-4.5) and I expect it would be thoroughly trounced in edge to edge and overall "perceptual megapixels" resolution and "sharpness" on a 24/36mp Nikon body. IIRC, DXO figure for that lens on a D800E/D810 body is about 28"P" MP - nothing on 4/3 comes even close. It probably only costs half as much too. Of course the "system" matters, which is why u4/3 is so hobbled when it comes to wide angle shooting for landscape, presuming that large detailed prints are the intended output. Who cares what the Olympus lens "might" be able to achieve when there's no way to achieve it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sony - Alpha A-100 and Manual Focus Lens???????? | infiniteMPG | Digital SLR Cameras | 5 | November 16th 07 09:38 PM |
Now Sony DSLR has focus issues?!? Maybe not. | RichA | Digital SLR Cameras | 3 | November 10th 07 05:56 PM |
Sony DSc-H2 Auto Focus problem | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 2 | July 31st 07 12:41 AM |
Sony DSC R1 sample photos at infinity focus | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 0 | July 4th 06 05:51 PM |
Sony DSC-W1 - Movie clips out of focus ?? | Rasmus | Digital Photography | 1 | September 29th 04 01:57 PM |