If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Contax G1 and focus
I also used a G2 for more than six months. The most annoying problem,
besides the focusing which is totally non-traditional, is that like all AF cameras it has unacceptable shutter lag. I tried it so many times. Even using the so called manual focus of G2 dial, everytime your thumb left the shutter release button after focusing or shooting, the lens retract to "resting" stage, and another shot won't happen untill the lens refocus to the pre-determined position after push the shutter again. That's just plain stupid and unacceptable. I don't object calling G2 a manual focus camera, but the way the lens works just eliminate it from contention as a fast street shooting camera, which is what a rangefinder camera is supposed to offer. Leica M, Bressa R/2, or Konica RF have none of this problem. Regards, Tris In article , joe wrote: Mike, Yes and no. I've shot some with a Leica M (but do not have experience with the new lenses). I actually prefer the accuracy on the G2 autofocus against a manual focus (using my old eyes), but thats a personal preference. The Leica viewfinder is superior in terms of use. But, with respect to quality of lens (and the resultant image) I can detect no big differences between the two. They are BOTH superior to any SLR I've ever used. I give the advantage to the Contax line for the preformance vs price. (On Ebay you can find a used G lens 45mm for $150..not bad for one of the best lenses that you can buy.) Again, just a user giving an opinion. I don't like comparing the two cameras...ones an exotic point and shoot (and in my opinion better than most SLRS on the planet), the M is a tank..classic manual rangefinder (and again better than most SLRs on the planet). I still love the G2. Joe |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Contax G1 and focus
Tris:
Good point but the problem that you described is easily solved. There are two ways around the issue (probably more). First, you can put the G2 into full manual mode, focus, and shoot away. (Although I never do it but you can easily bracket when you are shooting....you can also click off 4 frames a second.) The second way, and I use this feature a lot, is to hold the focus button (MF/CF/SF) on the rear of the camera and keep it depressed. This holds the focus for as long as you wish as you are shooting. There are a ton of very subtle features on this camera that are available. Contax did a poor job of making it intuitive (but compared to some of the new digitals, its a lot better) but they do exist. Hope this helps. As I mentioned earlier, the quality of the lens systems and the resultant images are well worth the learning curve in my opinion. Joe |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Contax G1 and focus
Yes Joe, I also rely on the focus button on the back. While I agree it's a solution to the lag, I still feel it's an extra movement I have to take and an easily forgetable step. Imagine my situation: operating two or three cameras in my daughter's Bronx Zoo event. Whenever I pick up the Leica M4-P, being hypofocused and metered earlier, it's a truly grab and shoot situation. When I change to the G2, also focused and metered before, I have to remember: push 1, then push 2. Guess it's a habit I never get used to. But I agree with you that the lens a truly amazing. Tris In article , joe wrote: Tris: Good point but the problem that you described is easily solved. There are two ways around the issue (probably more). First, you can put the G2 into full manual mode, focus, and shoot away. (Although I never do it but you can easily bracket when you are shooting....you can also click off 4 frames a second.) The second way, and I use this feature a lot, is to hold the focus button (MF/CF/SF) on the rear of the camera and keep it depressed. This holds the focus for as long as you wish as you are shooting. There are a ton of very subtle features on this camera that are available. Contax did a poor job of making it intuitive (but compared to some of the new digitals, its a lot better) but they do exist. Hope this helps. As I mentioned earlier, the quality of the lens systems and the resultant images are well worth the learning curve in my opinion. Joe |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Depth of Field is Enough to Negate Parallel Issues?????? | Dr. Slick | Large Format Photography Equipment | 10 | March 1st 04 08:40 PM |
auto focus mf camera | Don | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 17 | February 20th 04 02:45 AM |
Yashica / Contax lens questions | Harley Baldwin | Other Photographic Equipment | 0 | January 27th 04 08:26 PM |
Photo critque | Mark Vander Pol | Photographing Nature | 29 | December 20th 03 09:13 AM |
Rollei 6x6 projector focus | [email protected] | Other Photographic Equipment | 0 | December 1st 03 11:27 PM |