If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Capture NX is Painfully Slow
The Nikon Capture NX is software I received with my
D3 is painfully slow. (I suspect that this is, in part, because it is based on .net .) Can anyone suggest an alternative with at least comparable capability to deal with .nef files? Might Nikon provide a better software product? Mike. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Capture NX is Painfully Slow
"Mike -- Email Ignored" wrote in message news:0_nnk.506$EL2.29@trnddc01... The Nikon Capture NX is software I received with my D3 is painfully slow. (I suspect that this is, in part, because it is based on .net .) Can anyone suggest an alternative with at least comparable capability to deal with .nef files? Might Nikon provide a better software product? Mike. I was watching some beginner photography videos online today, and as it happens they mentioned this free software http://www.rawtherapee.com/ I just downloaded it today so haven't used it myself yet. I haven't used NX either so don't know how comparable they are -- Rob |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Capture NX is Painfully Slow
"Mike -- Email Ignored" wrote in message
news:0_nnk.506$EL2.29@trnddc01... The Nikon Capture NX is software I received with my D3 is painfully slow. (I suspect that this is, in part, because it is based on .net .) Can anyone suggest an alternative with at least comparable capability to deal with .nef files? Might Nikon provide a better software product? Mike. Capture One Pro. Fast as can be, slick as snot, and highly effective. My only complaint is I can't choose my color profile--it's Adobe RGB or the highway. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Capture NX is Painfully Slow
On Sat, 09 Aug 2008 19:26:55 -0400, bino wrote:
"Mike -- Email Ignored" wrote in message news:0_nnk.506$EL2.29@trnddc01... The Nikon Capture NX is software I received with my D3 is painfully slow. (I suspect that this is, in part, because it is based on .net .) Can anyone suggest an alternative with at least comparable capability to deal with .nef files? Might Nikon provide a better software product? Mike. Capture One Pro. Fast as can be, slick as snot, and highly effective. My only complaint is I can't choose my color profile--it's Adobe RGB or the highway. I took a quick look at the web site. I see that the Pro version is for a high volume operation, and cost 600 USD. They have a cheaper version, about 130 USD, for low volume. I am an advanced amateur with low volume. I like processing flexibility, but I don't like to wait long times for a data manipulations that should take at most, a few seconds. Do you think the cheaper version would be good? Mike. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Capture NX is Painfully Slow
On Sat, 09 Aug 2008 20:40:08 -0400, Rita Berkowitz wrote:
Mike -- Email Ignored wrote: The Nikon Capture NX is software I received with my D3 is painfully slow. (I suspect that this is, in part, because it is based on .net .) Can anyone suggest an alternative with at least comparable capability to deal with .nef files? Might Nikon provide a better software product? Download NX2 and it should be flying for ya. If you are using a dual proc system it will be amazingly fast. Rita I see that NX2 requires WinXP (as does Capture One Pro). Does this mean that I am finally going to be forced to abandon Win2K? Mike. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Capture NX is Painfully Slow
NX will run fine on an XP/Vista system that is of reasonably modern vintage
with 2 gbs ram. If you are using Win XP I suspect you have an older machine and it may be underpowered. If it cannot run NX it will not run any other modern image processing program at reasonable speed. If you can afford a D3 I suspect you can invest the $500 or so it would take to get a box with XP or Vista that will run NX and other image processing products fine. However if you want to future proof you need to invest a bit more and may want to try the 64 bit version of Vista as Adobe is rumored to be working on a 64 bit, presumably multi-threaded, version of Photoshop: the 64bit OS would theoretically allow access to much more ram for those giant raw files the D3 can produce. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Capture NX is Painfully Slow
"Mike -- Email Ignored" wrote in message
news:Shrnk.633$7N1.440@trnddc06... On Sat, 09 Aug 2008 20:40:08 -0400, Rita Berkowitz wrote: Mike -- Email Ignored wrote: The Nikon Capture NX is software I received with my D3 is painfully slow. (I suspect that this is, in part, because it is based on .net .) Can anyone suggest an alternative with at least comparable capability to deal with .nef files? Might Nikon provide a better software product? Download NX2 and it should be flying for ya. If you are using a dual proc system it will be amazingly fast. Rita I see that NX2 requires WinXP (as does Capture One Pro). Does this mean that I am finally going to be forced to abandon Win2K? Mike. Do you really expect the latest software to work perfectly on an old operating system? Next thing you'll want automatic transmission and power steering in your Model-T Ford. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Capture NX is Painfully Slow
On Sat, 09 Aug 2008 18:41:01 -0700, trouble wrote:
NX will run fine on an XP/Vista system that is of reasonably modern vintage with 2 gbs ram. If you are using Win XP I suspect you have an older machine and it may be underpowered. If it cannot run NX it will not run any other modern image processing program at reasonable speed. [...] I have 1G ram with a 1.299 GHZ AMD processor. Not enough, huh? Mike. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Capture NX is Painfully Slow
"Mike -- Email Ignored" wrote in message
news:vgsnk.519$EL2.341@trnddc01... On Sat, 09 Aug 2008 18:41:01 -0700, trouble wrote: NX will run fine on an XP/Vista system that is of reasonably modern vintage with 2 gbs ram. If you are using Win XP I suspect you have an older machine and it may be underpowered. If it cannot run NX it will not run any other modern image processing program at reasonable speed. [...] I have 1G ram with a 1.299 GHZ AMD processor. Not enough, huh? Mike. Using NX 1.3.4 on Vist 32 with 4GB RAM Open program Working set 97MB Open one NEF from D80 with no prior NX changes Working set 490MB Open another similar file without closing first file Working set 693MB Make a few standard adjustments to one of the files Working set 942MB |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Capture NX is Painfully Slow
Mike -- Email Ignored wrote:
[] I see that NX2 requires WinXP (as does Capture One Pro). Does this mean that I am finally going to be forced to abandon Win2K? Mike. You could, perhaps, run a VMware virtual machine under Windows 2000 and install XP on it. David |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Canon S3 IS - too slow? | gA | Digital Photography | 17 | September 3rd 07 11:34 AM |
Lightroom slow | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 28 | June 3rd 07 04:07 AM |
Why are the new DX lenses so slow? | Steve | Digital SLR Cameras | 90 | November 19th 06 09:33 PM |
ProShow Gold slow video import - slow can anyone help? | Derek | Digital Photography | 0 | January 8th 06 09:52 AM |
Slow? | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 1 | March 13th 05 03:08 PM |