If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Newbie question re. sharpness
Not sure if I missed it in the other posts, but a tripod is a must for
such a test! - Take photos at smallest F stop and F8 (at least) - At min, max and middle of the zoom range Shoot a brick wall/ facade or the like and review the results at 100% in photoshop. yes, I also always loved the "Watch out for bad copies."";-)) However, there are as many results as testers. Someone had a kit lens that was sharper than his new 24-105 F4L IS if I remember the post correctly. I would be pi#%d off ;-)) T http://tr-photo-blog.blogspot.com/ gwperil wrote: Rudy Benner wrote: "gwperil" wrote in message ups.com... Hi, I have what is hopefully a pretty basic question. I have a Canon 350D with the two kit lenses: * EF-S 18-55mm 1:3.5-5.6 II * EF 75-300mm 1:4-5.6 III USM As a test, I tried taking the "same" photo with each lens; that is, I framed a still object as closely as possible with each lens and used the same settings: Manual mode, 1/100s, f/5.6, ISO-100, Flash (Speedlite 430EX pointed ahead), tripod. Obviously I had to move the camera back to get the same shot with the 75-300. The only other difference was of course the focal lengths: 45mm vs 75mm. The picture taken with the 75-300 came out much sharper than with the 18-55. What accounts for that? I ask because, in general, I'm able to get better looking pictures out of the 75-300. Thanks in advance! Can you repeat the experiment without using the flash, use ambient light in an open area? Thanks for everyone's comments on this. I will take the advise of dropping the flash and going outside on a cloudy day. Then I will find a place to post the photos. Part of the reason for these tests is that I do not (yet) have the experience to differentiate between bad technique and inferior equipment... so as I consider a new lens, I want to measure the quality of the two kit lenses as a reference point. There are a lot of strong opinions out there with respect to lens quality. For example, I'm interested in the EF 28-135mm F/3.5-5.6 IS USM lens. Research is all over the map: "Perfect walk-around lens." "Way too soft." "IS is a life-saver." "IS is not worth the money." And my personal favorite: "Watch out for bad copies." Bad copies? There goes some more hair... I guess there's no substitute for just plunking down the $$$ and trying it out. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Newbie question re. sharpness
"t_rust" wrote in message Shoot a brick
wall/ facade or the like and review the results at 100% in photoshop. yes, I also always loved the "Watch out for bad copies."";-)) However, there are as many results as testers. Someone had a kit lens that was sharper than his new 24-105 F4L IS if I remember the post correctly. I would be pi#%d off ;-)) Canon DSLRs have a low pass filter in front of the sensor that limits the resolving power anyway by blurring the image. Any hard black to white transition seems to take about 3 pixels to occur fully and this is often the limiting factor in determining lens sharpness. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Newbie question re. sharpness
gwperil wrote:
As a test, I tried taking the "same" photo with each lens; that is, I framed a still object A flat object or a 3d object? Are you comparing the center, the edges or even the corners? Manual mode, 1/100s, f/5.6, ISO-100, Flash, tripod. 45mm vs 75mm. Note that f/5.6 is wide open for the 18-55@45mm while it's one stop down for the 75-300. In general, most lenses perform better one or two stops down than wide open. The picture taken with the 75-300 came out much sharper than with the 18-55. What accounts for that? There are a lot of possible reasons: * the focus was more accurate with the 75-300 (e.g. try manual focusing and/or shots at different distances as well.) * your 18-55mm is not performing to spec due to a manufacturing defect or damage * the 75-300@75mm f/5.6 is just sharper than the 18-55@45mm f/5.6 From Canon's published MTF curves, you might expect the 18-55@45 to be better in the center and the 75-300 better at the edges; but these are theoretical numbers and in the real world lenses vary. http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/co...ode lid=10512 http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/co...mode lid=7444 To understand more about these charts: http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tu...ding-mtf.shtml http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tu...contrast.shtml I ask because, in general, I'm able to get better looking pictures out of the 75-300. That would be my experience as well. The 75-300 Canon lenses I've used have been pretty good under 150mm. -- Erik |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Newbie question re. sharpness
gwperil wrote:
Part of the reason for these tests is that I do not (yet) have the experience to differentiate between bad technique and inferior equipment... At least you realize the difference. That's 90% of the problem solved! I want to measure the quality of the two kit lenses as a reference point. If you really want to "measure" there are charts and tools that can help: http://www.imatest.com/ http://www.normankoren.com/Tutorials/MTF5.html http://www.graphics.cornell.edu/~wes...res-chart.html The main problem with these is that they are not used under the same lighting/distance as most real-world photographs. For example, I'm interested in the EF 28-135mm F/3.5-5.6 IS USM lens. Note that these focal lengths are a bit long on an EF-S 1.6x crop camera. The 17-85mm is the EF-S equivalent. Research is all over the map: "Perfect walk-around lens." "Way too soft." "IS is a life-saver." "IS is not worth the money." And guess, what? All of these opinions may be true! A lot depends on how you use a lens and what you expect (and even what camera you use it with!). Bad copies? There goes some more hair... There are two solutions for this: 1) buy where you can return if not satisfied 2) be able/willing to send in the lens for calibration repair (ideally under warranty). I guess there's no substitute for just plunking down the $$$ and trying it out. You can also often rent lenses you cannot afford to buy - even via the internet in the U.S. http://www.rentglass.com/ -- Erik |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Newbie question re. sharpness
On 2006-12-12, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
wrote: You can also often rent lenses you cannot afford to buy - even via the internet in the U.S. http://www.rentglass.com/ Pretty cool site. The only problem I see: "In stock: No" on most of the items ... at least, for Nikon. Then sign up for email notification. I'd suspect that the depth of the notification queue is one factor that might be used to judge whether buying more copies will be profitable. At least it will tell you how long you might have to wait for a particular item. There is also a new competitor: http://www.ziplens.com A review: http://photodoto.com/index.php/2006/...ental-service/ (Note: I have not personally used either of these services, but have read mostly positive experiences from those who have.) -- Erik |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Newbie question re. sharpness
Hmm, there are more of these than I knew:
http://www.rentglass.com http://www.ziplens.com http://www.lensprotogo.com http://www.photolensrental.com http://www.rentcameragear.com And Adorama also does on-line rentals. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Newbie question re. sharpness
gwperil wrote: Hi, I have what is hopefully a pretty basic question. I have a Canon 350D with the two kit lenses: * EF-S 18-55mm 1:3.5-5.6 II * EF 75-300mm 1:4-5.6 III USM As a test, I tried taking the "same" photo with each lens; that is, I framed a still object as closely as possible with each lens and used the same settings: Manual mode, 1/100s, f/5.6, ISO-100, Flash (Speedlite 430EX pointed ahead), tripod. Obviously I had to move the camera back to get the same shot with the 75-300. The only other difference was of course the focal lengths: 45mm vs 75mm. The picture taken with the 75-300 came out much sharper than with the 18-55. What accounts for that? I ask because, in general, I'm able to get better looking pictures out of the 75-300. Thanks in advance! I've seen the 75-300 compared against a pro lens in the same focal range and the cheaper less produced pretty mediocre results. If the 18-55 is even worse, I'd start saving for a better lens for the 350 since it does have a good sensor with decent pixel count. In other words, your current lens set cannot meet what the sensor can offer. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Newbie question re. sharpness
wrote:
Hmm, there are more of these than I knew: http://www.rentglass.com http://www.ziplens.com http://www.lensprotogo.com http://www.photolensrental.com http://www.rentcameragear.com And Adorama also does on-line rentals. And Calumet if there's one in your town. I've used them, good for 1 day. Hmmm none of them have a Nikon 28mm f/1.4 AF |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Newbie question re. sharpness
In article , Paul
Furman wrote: wrote: Hmm, there are more of these than I knew: http://www.rentglass.com http://www.ziplens.com http://www.lensprotogo.com http://www.photolensrental.com http://www.rentcameragear.com And Adorama also does on-line rentals. And Calumet if there's one in your town. I've used them, good for 1 day. Hmmm none of them have a Nikon 28mm f/1.4 AF Pro Photo Supply (I use them), Citizen Photo, and several others, in Portland, OR. Just goes to show that you can probably find an outfit to rent to you in any major town you might be in or close to. Develop a relationship with them, and they will often even waive the deposit fees and such. Non-mail order rental is often a better choice, as you can sometimes do a spur of the moment rental and still get your equipment (I've called the afternoon before and still been able to rent the lens I needed/wanted for then next day. Helps if you need it during the week instead of weekends, because more people want to be out shooting on the weekends, and the sports photogs rent a lot of equipment on weekends as well), plus you can inspect it when you pick it up, and make sure that it is delivered back properly, on time, in person. -- You need only reflect that one of the best ways to get yourself a reputation as a dangerous citizen these days is to go about repeating the very phrases which our founding fathers used in the struggle for independence. -- Charles A. Beard |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
newbie RAW question for XP or FC1 | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 1 | April 24th 06 07:26 PM |
newbie question | [email protected] | Digital SLR Cameras | 28 | April 24th 06 04:47 AM |
Canon 5D Sharpness Question | Edward Holt | Digital SLR Cameras | 11 | February 26th 06 03:53 PM |
Newbie Question...? | [email protected] | Digital Photography | 7 | January 1st 05 12:03 AM |
Possible Newbie Question | MATT WILLIAMS | Large Format Photography Equipment | 5 | July 12th 04 01:27 PM |