If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
SPEAKING OF OLD PHOTOS ....
Here's one I just scanned that was taken by a friend of mine..... over
58 years ago. http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/73247465/original Hard to believe that the little girl in the pic is now an old lady. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
SPEAKING OF OLD PHOTOS ....
Annika1980 wrote: Here's one I just scanned that was taken by a friend of mine..... over 58 years ago. http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/73247465/original Hard to believe that the little girl in the pic is now an old lady. Kodachrome rocks! I noticed one pic in that series on your Pbase. Holy smokes!! You had your photo taken with the Tiger?! That's a definite keeper! Helen |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
SPEAKING OF OLD PHOTOS ....
Annika1980 wrote:
Here's one I just scanned that was taken by a friend of mine..... over 58 years ago. http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/73247465/original Hard to believe that the little girl in the pic is now an old lady. I guess that was a kodachrome slide, no? I dunno about the 'old' lady bit though, that kid looks about 3, which makes her now about 61. Wouldn't mind being 61 again (sigh). Colin D. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
SPEAKING OF OLD PHOTOS ....
The biggest sigh is that the attractive young parents are now likely
dead... denny - momma don't take my kodachromes away Colin_D wrote: Annika1980 wrote: Here's one I just scanned that was taken by a friend of mine..... over 58 years ago. http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/73247465/original Hard to believe that the little girl in the pic is now an old lady. I guess that was a kodachrome slide, no? I dunno about the 'old' lady bit though, that kid looks about 3, which makes her now about 61. Wouldn't mind being 61 again (sigh). Colin D. -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
SPEAKING OF OLD PHOTOS ....
"Annika1980" wrote in message oups.com... Here's one I just scanned that was taken by a friend of mine..... over 58 years ago. http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/73247465/original Hard to believe that the little girl in the pic is now an old lady. ************************************************** *********************** I like the other ones that I saw by just clicking on the picture. The Easter 1963 is something else with the gal with the flowery hat. Those gals on the sides must now be about my age (55) as they look like young teenagers then. Is that you with Tiger Woods? Just think how these are going to look in another 50 years. Ric in Wisconsin. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
SPEAKING OF OLD PHOTOS ....
Ric Trexell wrote: http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/73247465/original Hard to believe that the little girl in the pic is now an old lady. ************************************************** *********************** I like the other ones that I saw by just clicking on the picture. The Easter 1963 is something else with the gal with the flowery hat. Those gals on the sides must now be about my age (55) as they look like young teenagers then. You got it. Those are my sisters, now 56 and 54. Is that you with Tiger Woods? Yeah. Tiger was much thinner then. Of course, he was only 16. Oddly, I haven't changed much at all except that I lost the glasses. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
SPEAKING OF OLD PHOTOS ....
Annika1980 wrote:
Ric Trexell wrote: http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/73247465/original Hard to believe that the little girl in the pic is now an old lady. ************************************************** *********************** I like the other ones that I saw by just clicking on the picture. The Easter 1963 is something else with the gal with the flowery hat. Those gals on the sides must now be about my age (55) as they look like young teenagers then. You got it. Those are my sisters, now 56 and 54. Is that you with Tiger Woods? Yeah. Tiger was much thinner then. Of course, he was only 16. Oddly, I haven't changed much at all except that I lost the glasses. Losing those glasses was a good thing... -- Images (Plus Snaps & Grabs) by MarkČ at: www.pbase.com/markuson |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
SPEAKING OF OLD PHOTOS ....
"Annika1980" wrote in message
oups.com... Here's one I just scanned that was taken by a friend of mine..... over 58 years ago. http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/73247465/original Hard to believe that the little girl in the pic is now an old lady. And amazing how Point Park hasn't changed a wink. -- Mark Mostly photography... http://www.marklauter.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
SPEAKING OF OLD PHOTOS ....
Chatanooga - I remember it well.
Murray Bisbane australia. Annika1980 wrote: Here's one I just scanned that was taken by a friend of mine..... over 58 years ago. http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/73247465/original Hard to believe that the little girl in the pic is now an old lady. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
speaking of bokeh | [email protected] | 35mm Photo Equipment | 53 | December 16th 06 02:59 PM |
Speaking of Joel Meyerowitz... | John Emmons | Large Format Photography Equipment | 22 | October 29th 06 01:57 AM |
Speaking of the Xpan | 2 | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 4 | March 23rd 06 05:59 PM |
SPEAKING OF PANORAMICS .... | Annika1980 | Digital Photography | 5 | November 22nd 04 08:49 AM |
Speaking of thermometers | jjs | In The Darkroom | 16 | September 8th 04 03:12 AM |