If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
What Creates Noise/Grain At Higher ISO Speeds?
What is the actual reason why photos shot at higher ISO speeds create
noise/grain? In film, I can understand that to produce films which is more sensitive to light, the chemistry may be different, but why is this evident with digital? If you look here, noise is very evident in this digital shot, but I am puzzled why it occurs: http://www.pbase.com/jps_photo/image/36330285/original |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
In message ,
"Matt" wrote: What is the actual reason why photos shot at higher ISO speeds create noise/grain? In film, I can understand that to produce films which is more sensitive to light, the chemistry may be different, but why is this evident with digital? If you look here, noise is very evident in this digital shot, but I am puzzled why it occurs: http://www.pbase.com/jps_photo/image/36330285/original Do you realize what you are looking at there? (Most of) the image was highly sharpened with no noise-reduction, and this is at ISO 1600. You are looking at what would be a 40 inch by 27 inch full image, if your monitor were big enough to display it; that's over 3 feet wide. Also, the optics are at the limits of their resolution, so there is no high-contrast image detail to compete with the noise. The noise got sharpened more than the detail. Look at the left and bottom edges; there is no sharpening there. -- John P Sheehy |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The point of this example was not to say this was a poor photo, just to give
an example of noise. It was chose randomly only as an example of noise. If I knew this would upset people, I would not have included the link. I included the link purely as an example. I hope I have not offended anyone. wrote in message ... Do you realize what you are looking at there? (Most of) the image was highly sharpened with no noise-reduction, and this is at ISO 1600. You are looking at what would be a 40 inch by 27 inch full image, if your monitor were big enough to display it; that's over 3 feet wide. Also, the optics are at the limits of their resolution, so there is no high-contrast image detail to compete with the noise. The noise got sharpened more than the detail. Look at the left and bottom edges; there is no sharpening there. -- John P Sheehy |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Amplification of the signal, they also amplify the noise thats present , as
well as the low level signal at higher ISOs. "Matt" wrote in message ... What is the actual reason why photos shot at higher ISO speeds create noise/grain? In film, I can understand that to produce films which is more sensitive to light, the chemistry may be different, but why is this evident with digital? If you look here, noise is very evident in this digital shot, but I am puzzled why it occurs: http://www.pbase.com/jps_photo/image/36330285/original |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Amplification of the signal, they also amplify the noise thats present , as
well as the low level signal at higher ISOs. "Matt" wrote in message ... What is the actual reason why photos shot at higher ISO speeds create noise/grain? In film, I can understand that to produce films which is more sensitive to light, the chemistry may be different, but why is this evident with digital? If you look here, noise is very evident in this digital shot, but I am puzzled why it occurs: http://www.pbase.com/jps_photo/image/36330285/original |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Many of the explanations for noise in electronic sensors are based on the
technical limits of the early digital technology we are still using. As such they are misleading. One of the misconceptions is that smaller digital sensors can never yield the lower noise now seen in larger sensors. The fact is that noise levels will decrease in all digital sensors as more experience is gained in the design and manufacture of these devices. So will the dynamic range of light values the sensors are able to capture. Claims to this effect are already being made for the newest Canon and Fuji dSLRs. Manufacturer's claims, like those of politicians, occasionally coincide with reality. The most important limiting factor in reducing the size and performance (regardless of sensor size) of high resolution digital sensors has nothing to do with sensor technology but has to do with the inherent properties of light, reflection (above and within the sensor), diffaction and the inescapable problems of bringing all color light rays into focus at the same plane. The sort of optical noise that is caused by the intereacting properties of light, lenses and the flat plane of digital sensors (regardless of sensor size) is already underappreciated in evaluating the performances of current digital cameras. Because of these effects the designs of lenses for high end digital cameras are going in directions that film cameras did not require. Software may be part of the solution. Programs already exist for post-exposure tweaking of vignetting, barrel and pincusion distortion but they require manual tweaking. Who knows what the future will bring? Olympus has publicly stated it is moving toward building this sort of post-exposure processing into its dSLR line. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Matt wrote:
What is the actual reason why photos shot at higher ISO speeds create noise/grain? In film, I can understand that to produce films which is more sensitive to light, the chemistry may be different, but why is this evident with digital? If you look here, noise is very evident in this digital shot, but I am puzzled why it occurs: http://www.pbase.com/jps_photo/image/36330285/original Film suffers larger physical grain (dye clouds) in the plane of the film (call it x,y) as the ISO goes up. Faster speed = larger 'grain' or dye clouds. This results in the grain that you see. It's not really that cut and dry, but the end result is coarseness in the negative image that we call "grainy". In digital, the x,y is constant regardless of the sensitivity... the grain size will always be the same for a given sensor. However, the noise level will be different from pixel to pixel, and this difference is amplified by the increasing sensitivity... that is what gives the noisy 'grainy' look on high ISO digital shots. The 'grains' remain the same size, but there is a greater dynamic difference between them due to noise. This is more complex than that, as each pixel that you see from most SLR's is a composite of several pixels of different color. The noise response in, eg, red, green and blue channels is different for each color and this further makes pixel to pixel noise differences more apparent in the resulting end pixel. Hope that helps. -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI gallery]: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- [SI rulz]: http://www.aliasimages.com/si/rulz.html -- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Matt wrote:
What is the actual reason why photos shot at higher ISO speeds create noise/grain? In film, I can understand that to produce films which is more sensitive to light, the chemistry may be different, but why is this evident with digital? If you look here, noise is very evident in this digital shot, but I am puzzled why it occurs: http://www.pbase.com/jps_photo/image/36330285/original Film suffers larger physical grain (dye clouds) in the plane of the film (call it x,y) as the ISO goes up. Faster speed = larger 'grain' or dye clouds. This results in the grain that you see. It's not really that cut and dry, but the end result is coarseness in the negative image that we call "grainy". In digital, the x,y is constant regardless of the sensitivity... the grain size will always be the same for a given sensor. However, the noise level will be different from pixel to pixel, and this difference is amplified by the increasing sensitivity... that is what gives the noisy 'grainy' look on high ISO digital shots. The 'grains' remain the same size, but there is a greater dynamic difference between them due to noise. This is more complex than that, as each pixel that you see from most SLR's is a composite of several pixels of different color. The noise response in, eg, red, green and blue channels is different for each color and this further makes pixel to pixel noise differences more apparent in the resulting end pixel. Hope that helps. -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI gallery]: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- [SI rulz]: http://www.aliasimages.com/si/rulz.html -- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Matt wrote:
The point of this example was not to say this was a poor photo, just to give an example of noise. It was chose randomly only as an example of noise. See my other reply. If I knew this would upset people, I would not have included the link. I included the link purely as an example. And a good thing you did. I hope I have not offended anyone. Nah. Don't worry about assorted crankies. Cheers, Alan -- -- r.p.e.35mm user resource: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpe35mmur.htm -- r.p.d.slr-systems: http://www.aliasimages.com/rpdslrsysur.htm -- [SI gallery]: http://www.pbase.com/shootin -- [SI rulz]: http://www.aliasimages.com/si/rulz.html -- e-meil: there's no such thing as a FreeLunch. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What Creates Noise/Grain At Higher ISO Speeds? | Matt | Digital Photography | 114 | November 19th 04 01:24 AM |
Two Odd Films | Neil Purling | Large Format Photography Equipment | 16 | August 13th 04 08:06 PM |