If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
8x10 Dupe Film Question
I recently bought some slightly outdated C-41 film in 8x10 (Portra) and
11x14 (VeriColor)formats but included in the sale were 6 boxes of AGFA CRD 8x10 Dupe film (E-6). Considering the cost of 8x10 E-6 films--is this film good/usable for general use? Any ideas of ISO if it is usable----I've got about $6 per box of 50 sheets of 8x10 in this stuff. Open to suggestions! J Burke |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Jos. Burke" wrote in
: I recently bought some slightly outdated C-41 film in 8x10 (Portra) and 11x14 (VeriColor)formats but included in the sale were 6 boxes of AGFA CRD 8x10 Dupe film (E-6). Considering the cost of 8x10 E-6 films--is this film good/usable for general use? Any ideas of ISO if it is usable----I've got about $6 per box of 50 sheets of 8x10 in this stuff. Open to suggestions! J Burke If it's the same as roll-film E-6 duplicating films, it's quite slow (EI 6 or 12, IIRC), relatively low in contrast, but should be very sharp and fine grained. At that film price, it's the cost of processing that makes it questionable for experimentation; if you don't mind paying to process a few sheets, or can process your own E-6 at reasonable cost, you might try shooting a ring-around test at EI 12 and see what you get. You might find you like it; if not, you're only out the cost of processing the tests and can put the unused film on eBay or otherwise pass it along to someone for whom it's a better match -- or save it for actually duplicating 8x10 chromes by contact printing... -- The challenge to the photographer is to command the medium, to use whatever current equipment and technology furthers his creative objectives, without sacrificing the ability to make his own decisions. -- Ansel Adams Donald Qualls, aka The Silent Observer http://silent1.home.netcom.com Opinions expressed are my own -- take them for what they're worth and don't expect them to be perfect. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Jos. Burke" wrote in
: I recently bought some slightly outdated C-41 film in 8x10 (Portra) and 11x14 (VeriColor)formats but included in the sale were 6 boxes of AGFA CRD 8x10 Dupe film (E-6). Considering the cost of 8x10 E-6 films--is this film good/usable for general use? Any ideas of ISO if it is usable----I've got about $6 per box of 50 sheets of 8x10 in this stuff. Open to suggestions! J Burke If it's the same as roll-film E-6 duplicating films, it's quite slow (EI 6 or 12, IIRC), relatively low in contrast, but should be very sharp and fine grained. At that film price, it's the cost of processing that makes it questionable for experimentation; if you don't mind paying to process a few sheets, or can process your own E-6 at reasonable cost, you might try shooting a ring-around test at EI 12 and see what you get. You might find you like it; if not, you're only out the cost of processing the tests and can put the unused film on eBay or otherwise pass it along to someone for whom it's a better match -- or save it for actually duplicating 8x10 chromes by contact printing... -- The challenge to the photographer is to command the medium, to use whatever current equipment and technology furthers his creative objectives, without sacrificing the ability to make his own decisions. -- Ansel Adams Donald Qualls, aka The Silent Observer http://silent1.home.netcom.com Opinions expressed are my own -- take them for what they're worth and don't expect them to be perfect. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
It will almost certainly also require quite a bit of filtration for camera use
to use as color balance is not an issue with transparency duplicating films. When I used to use the stuff, each new batch required testing for exposure and filtration. You can also use it to duplicate 4x5 (or even 35mm) transparencies to 8x10 for presentation. Hank Donald Qualls wrote: "Jos. Burke" wrote in : I recently bought some slightly outdated C-41 film in 8x10 (Portra) and 11x14 (VeriColor)formats but included in the sale were 6 boxes of AGFA CRD 8x10 Dupe film (E-6). Considering the cost of 8x10 E-6 films--is this film good/usable for general use? Any ideas of ISO if it is usable----I've got about $6 per box of 50 sheets of 8x10 in this stuff. Open to suggestions! J Burke If it's the same as roll-film E-6 duplicating films, it's quite slow (EI 6 or 12, IIRC), relatively low in contrast, but should be very sharp and fine grained. At that film price, it's the cost of processing that makes it questionable for experimentation; if you don't mind paying to process a few sheets, or can process your own E-6 at reasonable cost, you might try shooting a ring-around test at EI 12 and see what you get. You might find you like it; if not, you're only out the cost of processing the tests and can put the unused film on eBay or otherwise pass it along to someone for whom it's a better match -- or save it for actually duplicating 8x10 chromes by contact printing... -- The challenge to the photographer is to command the medium, to use whatever current equipment and technology furthers his creative objectives, without sacrificing the ability to make his own decisions. -- Ansel Adams Donald Qualls, aka The Silent Observer http://silent1.home.netcom.com Opinions expressed are my own -- take them for what they're worth and don't expect them to be perfect. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
It will almost certainly also require quite a bit of filtration for camera use
to use as color balance is not an issue with transparency duplicating films. When I used to use the stuff, each new batch required testing for exposure and filtration. You can also use it to duplicate 4x5 (or even 35mm) transparencies to 8x10 for presentation. Hank Donald Qualls wrote: "Jos. Burke" wrote in : I recently bought some slightly outdated C-41 film in 8x10 (Portra) and 11x14 (VeriColor)formats but included in the sale were 6 boxes of AGFA CRD 8x10 Dupe film (E-6). Considering the cost of 8x10 E-6 films--is this film good/usable for general use? Any ideas of ISO if it is usable----I've got about $6 per box of 50 sheets of 8x10 in this stuff. Open to suggestions! J Burke If it's the same as roll-film E-6 duplicating films, it's quite slow (EI 6 or 12, IIRC), relatively low in contrast, but should be very sharp and fine grained. At that film price, it's the cost of processing that makes it questionable for experimentation; if you don't mind paying to process a few sheets, or can process your own E-6 at reasonable cost, you might try shooting a ring-around test at EI 12 and see what you get. You might find you like it; if not, you're only out the cost of processing the tests and can put the unused film on eBay or otherwise pass it along to someone for whom it's a better match -- or save it for actually duplicating 8x10 chromes by contact printing... -- The challenge to the photographer is to command the medium, to use whatever current equipment and technology furthers his creative objectives, without sacrificing the ability to make his own decisions. -- Ansel Adams Donald Qualls, aka The Silent Observer http://silent1.home.netcom.com Opinions expressed are my own -- take them for what they're worth and don't expect them to be perfect. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Who's left in the E6 biz? | [email protected] | In The Darkroom | 49 | September 22nd 04 07:23 AM |
Airport X-ray film question | Christopher Bogart | 35mm Photo Equipment | 15 | September 19th 04 08:09 PM |
Another MF scanner question!! Nikon 8000 vs. 9000 and B&W film | Q.G. de Bakker | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 9 | July 3rd 04 05:58 PM |
Jobo Film loaders with base for 120 film question! | Nick Zentena | In The Darkroom | 2 | January 24th 04 10:05 PM |
A question about Efke film | JRF | Film & Labs | 4 | December 28th 03 02:42 AM |