Guth Venus is way more alive than Usenet

"John McWilliams" wrote in message

Could be the x=posting.

F-U set.

I have not a good idea as to whatever Usenet "x=posting" represents.
I'm fairly certain it has something MI/NSA by nature, and it's otherwise
not likely intended as a good thing.

If MI/NSA spooks and moles are using "x=posting" as a stealth method of
pestering whomever they like, and/or of infomercial-spamming humanity
for all it's worth, as such there's no way that our lord all-knowing
GOOGLE doesn't know exactly from where each and every one of those
x=posting packets emerge from, if not from within their own cloak and
dagger ranks.
-
Brad Guth




--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

Brad Guth wrote:
"John McWilliams" wrote in message

Could be the x=posting.

F-U set.

I have not a good idea as to whatever Usenet "x=posting" represents.
I'm fairly certain it has something MI/NSA by nature, and it's otherwise
not likely intended as a good thing.

If MI/NSA spooks and moles are using "x=posting" as a stealth method of
pestering whomever they like, and/or of infomercial-spamming humanity
for all it's worth, as such there's no way that our lord all-knowing
GOOGLE doesn't know exactly from where each and every one of those
x=posting packets emerge from, if not from within their own cloak and
dagger ranks.
-
Brad Guth




--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

Mr. Guth,
You are living proof that the Internet brings out all the fruits and
nuts.

Best wishes
Bill in Lake Charles, LA

Phil wrote:

Just out of interest, when was the last time you has sex?


"Brad Guth" wrote in message
news:9d26ff3a1b92bd3cdabc890a95c16bf8.49644@mygat e.mailgate.org...




Oh, I'll bet he has a _lot_ of sex.
Reading his postings, I don't think I ever ran into someone who was so
completely and thoroughly ****ed. :-)

Pat

"Bill K" wrote in message
ups.com

Mr. Guth,
You are living proof that the Internet brings out all the fruits and
nuts.

That's odd, because you're the living proof that I've been correct about
this anti-think-tank of a Usenet from hell that sucks and blows all
along.

It's Usenet rusemasters and/or Third Reich minions like yourself that
has us at war with damn near half the world, and there's obviously more
to come.
-
Brad Guth




--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

As you can tell, the Usenet MIB spooks and moles are out in force. Soon
it likely will become Usenet WW-III. Therefore I'll try an updated
effort at delivering this message once again.

You'd certainly never know by way of the usual anti-think-tank of this
Usenet of infomercial standards, but in spite of their obvious
ESA/(Venus Express) and "Guth Venus" banishment, there's all sorts of
new and improved science arriving about Venus, all of which further
supports the geothermal nature of our extremely nearby and rather toasty
Venus as being one seriously hot place for the likes of us wussy humans
to live. The facts of that thick and terribly buoyant soup of an
atmosphere being so extra toasty by day and otherwise cooling off rather
nicely by night (extracting roughly 15% more thermal energy than solar
contributed) does not significantly alter the geothermally heated
surface situation by day or night, as being from where most of that
environmental thermal energy has been derived from, that's still in the
newish planetology phase of having been radiating and otherwise
continually outgassing and thereby unavoidably heating the Venusian
atmosphere as primarily from the bottom up.

ESA's thermal imaging and other planetology science results from Venus
Express, with lots more to come.
http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/obj...objectid=39432

For starters, we have had fairly old science as to appreciating the
surface geothermal anomaly differentials of what that physically active
environment as having 225~240 K has to work with:

http://www.lpi.usra.edu/science/kief...oebe_fig2b.gif
Once the Venus EXPRESS PFS instrument is rebooted/activated and
contributing in depth of better thermal imaging resolution that should
penetrate down to the surface, whereas this is when we'll get another
good deal of updated science as pertaining towards mapping those
multiple hot spots or active volcanic zones of geothermal lava and/or of
various surface mud flows, possibly sufficient resolution as to
re-identify the active area associated with the 'Fluid Arch'.

Therefore, Venus is simply not offering the exact same surface
temperature upon each and every square meter of that newish planetary
environment, and there's certainly absolute loads of what's local and of
essentially unlimited/renewable energy that's available to work with.
There's also absolutely nothing technical that's entirely insurmountable
on behalf of other intelligent life having existed/coexisted, whereas
there's only the ongoing bigotry, greed and arrogance of Usenet
naysayism that's continually hard at work of their status quo
wagging-thy-dogs to death, of otherwise imposing as much collateral
damage and carnage of the innocent without a stitch of remorse to boot
is what we should expect.

The image of a Venusian township or community of those extremely large
and I think impressive structures, as having their perfectly rational
configuration of Venusian infrastructure, along with having their nearby
tarmac that's fairly complex, isn't a joke. But since most Usenet folks
and official rusemasters tend to refuse to believe my image processing
and banish all subsequent interpretations, or for that matter of
whatever anyone else happens to perceive as being potentially artificial
gets their official banishment or as much mainstream status quo flak
and/or torment as this Usenet from naysay hell can muster (yet they'll
believe each and every NASA/Apollo image w/o question and/or without a
stitch of physics or any other hard-science in support thereof) is why
I'm starting off by posting the raw NASA/Magellan image link, which so
happens to contain those terrific items of interest, that which I've
spoken of and having requested honest contributions from all that's
worth sharing for the past seven years.

Here's the original composite of an official Magellan image at roughly
225 m and 36 image confirming looks/pixel:
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hi...c115s095_1.gif

If I'm not asking too much, please take another unbiased/(open mindset)
1:1 look-see, and tell us whatever it is that you honestly think, and
please do share as to the observationology and/or planetology basis of
whatever's encharge of your best SWAG or investigative mindset. If you
can't manage or otherwise refuse to accomplish the digital PhotoShop
enlargements, in which case I'll provide my best efforts as to sharing
the step by step of whatever photographic enlargement/(zoom-in) process
has to offer, and then I'll share the enlargement results of what I've
managed to accomplish, which unfortunately isn't going to be 10% as good
as what our nondisclosure NIMA team has to offer, and it shouldn't even
be nearly as good as whatever yourself and your software of whatever
PhotoShop can deliver.
-
Brad Guth


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

Brad Guth wrote:

OK, who read past here?

In article
lgate.org,
"Brad Guth" wrote:

You'd certainly never know by way of Usenet infomercial standards, but
there's all sorts of new and improved science arriving about Venus, all
of which further supports the geothermal nature of our extremely nearby
and rather toasty Venus as being one seriously hot place for the likes
of us wussy humans to live. The facts of that thick and terribly
buoyant soup of an atmosphere being so extra toasty by day and otherwise
cooling off rather nicely by night (extracting roughly 15% more thermal
energy than solar contributed) does not significantly alter the
geothermally heated surface situation by day or night, as being from
where most of that environmental thermal energy has been derived from,
that's still in the newish planetology phase of having been radiating
and otherwise continually outgassing and thereby unavoidably heating the
Venusian atmosphere as primarily from the bottom up.

Thermal imaging and other planetology science results from Venus Express
http://sci.esa.int/science-e/www/obj...objectid=39432

For starters, we have had fairly old science as to appreciating the
surface geothermal anomaly differentials of what that physical
environment as having 225~240 K has to work with:

http://www.lpi.usra.edu/science/kief...oebe_fig2b.gif
Once the Venus EXPRESS PFS instrument is rebooted/activated and
contributing in depth of better thermal imaging resolution that should
penetrate down to the surface, whereas this is when we'll get another
good deal of updated science as pertaining to those multiple hot spots
or active volcanic zones of geothermal lava and/or of various surface
mud flows, possibly sufficient resolution as to re-identify the active
area associated with the 'Fluid Arch'.

Therefore, Venus is simply not offering the exact same surface
temperature upon each and every square meter of that newish environment,
and there's certainly absolute loads of what's local and of essentially
unlimited/renewable energy available to work with. There's also
absolutely nothing technical that's entirely insurmountable on behalf of
other intelligent life having existed/coexisted, whereas there's only
the ongoing bigotry, greed and arrogance of Usenet naysayism that's
continually hard at work of their wagging-thy-dogs to death.

The image of a Venusian township or community of those extremely large
structures, as having their perfectly rational configuration of
infrastructure, along with having their nearby tarmac that's fairly
complex, isn't a joke. But since most Usenet folks and official
rusemasters tend to refuse to believe my image processing and banish all
subsequent interpretations, or for that matter of whatever anyone else
happens to perceive as being potentially artificial gets their official
banishment or as much mainstream status quo flak and/or torment as this
Usenet from naysay hell can muster (yet they'll believe each and every
NASA/Apollo image w/o question and/or without a stitch of physics or any
other hard-science in support thereof) is why I'm starting off by
posting the raw NASA/Magellan image link, which so happens to contain
those terrific items of interest, that which I've spoken of and having
requested honest contributions from all that's worth sharing for the
past seven years.

Here's the original composite and official Magellan image at roughly 225
m and 36 looks/pixel:
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hi...c115s095_1.gif

If I'm not asking too much, please take another unbiased/(open mindset)
1:1 look-see, and tell us whatever you honestly think, and please do
share as to the observationology and/or planetology basis of whatever's
encharge of your best SWAG or investigative mindset. If you can't
manage or otherwise refuse to accomplish the digital PhotoShop
enlargements, in which case I'll offer my best efforts as to sharing the
step by step of whatever photographic enlargement/(zoom-in) process, and
then I'll share the results of what I've managed to accomplish, which
unfortunately isn't going to be 10% as good as what our nondisclosure
NIMA team has to offer.
-
Brad Guth

yeah but I prefer shooting sunsets and the cloudcover seems to rule that
out so, no I'm not going to move there.

i feel your pain i would also like a 1d mark II but can't afford one

For starters, we have had fairly old science as to appreciating the
surface geothermal anomaly differentials of what that physical
environment as having 225~240 K has to work with:

"Stewy" wrote in message


yeah but I prefer shooting sunsets and the cloudcover seems to rule that
out so, no I'm not going to move there.

There's still sunsets on Venus, and I'd bet quite colorful getting
through those complex cloud formations of such multiple layers of
interesting acidic elements. Especially if having the extended spectrum
of a good CCD (deposited on diamond of course) at your disposal.

There's 2650 w/m2 to start off with, and that clouded environment is
actually relatively transparent to the 425 nm (+/- 25 nm) spectrum, and
there might even be a touch of 375 nm getting through.

The only problem is the Venusian day is more like that of an extended
season of day or night, which is also a good thing because, each sunrise
or sunset is good for hosting such events for several of our days at a
time. It's also good to know that via a rigid airship you can basically
get yourself the hell out of town before that sunshine makes the local
environment that much worse off.
-
Brad Guth


--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG

"picture taker" wrote in message
oups.com

i feel your pain i would also like a 1d mark II but can't afford one

I think a Venusian certified "1d mark II" might run either of us a cool
$million, if not more.
-
Brad Guth




--
Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG